I'd be surprised if that was actually the case.
I would'nt be surprised.
I'd be surprised if that was actually the case.
Polishing has nothing to do with content. It is a measure of how solid, how finished and well thought-out a product comes across at the user end.
They scrapped GT HD, totally new everything from there on out. Physics and everything.Btw PD was the first dev to get devolpment kits for PS3!
The exact same cars and tracks look worse in GT5 than Prologue!
GTHD 1920 x 1080
GT5p 1440 x 1080
GT5 1280 x 1080!!!
What a convincing argument.I would'nt be surprised.
What does this even mean?WOOOOOOOOW. Such linear thinking. Learn to broaden it up a bit.
They scrapped GT:HD and transferred everything they had completed over to GT5.They scrapped GT HD, totally new everything from there on out. Physics and everything.
If they did, it's not like they borrowed it from somebody. It's theirs.
Feb. 08 was around the last time people cared about that thread. Have you seen the new polls?Please take a look at the figures this poll created: https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=173677
Note that this is on a GT5 fan forum. Less than 40% of voters are fully satisfied with the game. More than 60% have either stopped playing, only play it once in a while or are beginning to feel bored with it. And this was roughly three months after release, when the game was still fresh.
That's what I don't understand. GT HD isn't anything anymore. They clicked delete.I think he is saying that GT5 should be better since alot of it came from GTHD.
What a convincing argument.
They scrapped GT:HD and transferred everything they had completed over to GT5.
Do you understand how stupid it would be to do that? Develop a large amount of content, then throw it all out, then recreate it again (since everything that was in GT:HD was in Prologue and GT5)?That's what I don't understand. GT HD isn't anything anymore. They clicked delete.
Oh boy, you sure showed me.It's the idea that's ur just using words for the sake of words no argument there either.
Do you understand how stupid it would be to do that? Develop a large amount of content, then throw it all out, then recreate it again (since everything that was in GT:HD was in Prologue and GT5)?
Oh boy, you sure showed me.
Granted, I took the time to explain my point and you basically responded with "nuh uh," but damn, I guess I can't argue with that kind of hard-hitting logic.
Do you understand how stupid it would be to do that? Develop a large amount of content, then throw it all out, then recreate it again (since everything that was in GT:HD was in Prologue and GT5)?
Oh no! Opinions? On the internet! What was I thinking.There you go again. Nothing but opinion.
What is this supposed to mean?Who ever said that they kept it? Learn to read into things.
It's been getting closer to 7 months since the release of GT5, and most people aren't even close to being done with GT5. It's a SIM. That's all people should care about, most of us think. How can people not understand that though?I know this is totally not comparable, but bfbc2 has that awe, and you just can't stop playing it completely, i still play it at least once a week and i have had it for all most a year.
You also said yourself that you downloaded the demo for GTHD and the leaderboards are still there. How could that be if they hit the delete key?That's what I don't understand. GT HD isn't anything anymore. They clicked delete.
What is this supposed to mean?
That is not the case. If it were where did Eiger come from then? I don't think they would model the track and then hit delete and make a new one for GT5P.
What exactly was left out that the other full versions of GT had?It's really plain and simple. The majority of the people feel like the game is missing quite a few features. For those who are use to the previous titles it seems stuff got left out. It's there in black and white.
PRAISE HIIIIM! Kaz has said it before, he can't envision what the end product will be at the start of development. It's impossible. Programming isn't drawing in a blank paged book.BTW I wasn't trying to argue anything, but the Fact that the Majority do not know the process of creating a game... so just be understandable to the idea of what GT5 is, and to appreciate it. And if not that's fine by you, but don't try and belittle this guys creation that no other match up to.
Oh no! Opinions? On the internet! What was I thinking.
Go troll somewhere else. At least another_jakhole is attempting to discuss the topic matter.
What is this supposed to mean?
Can you explain a reason why PD would make all of the stuff that they made for GT:HD, then throw it all out when the game got canceled, then remake it all again from scratch for Prologue?Where did you hear PD kept GT HD's work? They're not the same project.
Considering the way you've responded to everyone's attempt to discuss things with you, it seems perfectly appropriate.Now you are using the word the troll... really.
Now you are using the word the troll... really.
Can you explain a reason why PD would make all of the stuff that they made for GT:HD, then throw it all out when the game got canceled, then remake it all again for Prologue?
Considering the way you've responded to everyone's attempt to discuss things with you, it seems perfectly appropriate.
Can you explain a reason why PD would make all of the stuff that they made for GT:HD, then throw it all out when the game got canceled, then remake it all again from scratch for Prologue?
Programming wise they scrapped it. I just played GT HD's Eiger a few hours ago. The detail is sorry compared to GT5 and everything isn't the same. The thing it does better, is the 3D modeled spectators that look like they can jump in front of the cars.
What exactly was left out that the other full versions of GT had?
PRAISE HIIIIM! Kaz has said it before, he can't envision what the end product will be at the start of development. It's impossible. Programming isn't drawing in a blank paged book.