CDailey 13,818 Alabama Feb 1, 2006 #5 Must have been something big on the road he was trying to avoid.
skip0110 5,178 Worcester, MA skip0110 Feb 1, 2006 #7 Looks like the bus has better rollover resistance than an Explorer
Revheadnz 2,321 Feb 1, 2006 #8 Hehe, that was awesome. The driver would have needed some new pants after that methinks.
Carl. 2,767 Feb 1, 2006 #9 I thought he'd be able to take control back at some point... Well, could have been much worse, though I wouldn't want to be sitting in the back when that happened, even more given the absence of seatbelts.
I thought he'd be able to take control back at some point... Well, could have been much worse, though I wouldn't want to be sitting in the back when that happened, even more given the absence of seatbelts.
dropzone 273 Feb 3, 2006 #10 That was and and at the same time. I can't recall seeing any buses like that around where I stay, or in the US. I guess it's a European thing .
That was and and at the same time. I can't recall seeing any buses like that around where I stay, or in the US. I guess it's a European thing .
WTF!?
I thought he'd be able to take control back at some point... Well, could have been much worse, though I wouldn't want to be sitting in the back when that happened, even more given the absence of seatbelts. 
at the same time. I can't recall seeing any buses like that around where I stay, or in the US. I guess it's a European thing 
.
