- 895
- RF_Stonemonkey
By "equipement" I was meaning Hans-Helmet/Belt-airbag... this was out of car consideration.
Each car has a different response to crash due to their conception, and like i said before 63km/h is a standard decided by crash-test association all around the world. It means it's the maximal speed at which a crash test is meaningful to set the car security towards crash, above this speed the result of crash is too hazardous and becomes (equals) lethal.
Sorry for the misunderstanding
EDIT: for Kubica's crash, they are considering as a miracle the fact that he end up the crash without really be injured cause of the violence of the crash when the car was litterally "flying" into the wall at 200+km/h. Massa did not had the same chance, and spent few weeks in the hospital (even if the most severe injure has been made by the spring hitting his helmet before the crash).
I do agree it was quite something that Kubica came out of that relatively unharmed, it's just I don't agree that the 63Km/h thing which I think applies more to drivers with 3 point seatbelts and no helmet/HANS and have much bigger chance of head/neck/spine/internal injuries in a crash than an F1 driver, even with higher speeds in F1.
You might find this interesting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4tuvOer_GI
EDIT:Anyway, this has all gone a bit off topic.
Last edited: