fast and the furious or 2f2f which is better?

[nk4e]

then why did u watch the movie

 

[Timmotheus]

Originally posted by nightkids4ever
then why did u watch the movie

He never said he watched the movie. Reread his post.

 

[eddieturner2002]

Fast and Furious films were total crap the stories were crap......the cars were just.......well.......just plain crap....if they'd actually stuck something under the bonnet rather than a hamster in it's wheel then the film mighta been good

 

[gS_*L()5t*]

dude...do u even know what ur talking about?

 

[RX72005]

they were both two hours of 🤬 . and 2 reasons why......

1. TFATF: VERY VERY talentless acting.
2. 2F2F: who puts neons on a Skyline??

 

[KosmikFool]

Originally posted by gS_*L()5t*
dang homie i know that aint u in that ride...but if it is u, what u got under those hoods?

Thats obviously a Photoshopped image you're looking at. I mean, why else would there be smear marks all around each car.

Anyways, all those cars were weighed down with stereos, neons, and the wrong type of bodykits. Wouldn't you rather see a car with a solid paint job, nice, quaint sideskirts, good bodykit that isn't overly huge, and maybe a wing on the back that doesn't weigh more than the car itself? Or would you rather see this...

I mean, you take perfectly fine cars, and mutilate them! And drifting used to be cool until Initial D caught on and every ricer and his mother think they can "drift." Go watch Bullitt - a real car movie.

 

[eddieturner2002]

gS_*L()5t*
dude...do u even know what ur talking about?

Yeh i do and kosmik fool knows wat im talking bout 2. As soon as them movies came out a loada fools who know jack s**t bout cars suddenly tought oh yeh lets go get girls by destroying our cars with crap. When the movies came out the number of stylish cars went way down due to losers sticking massive bodykits and HUGE spoilers on. When i get a car im gunna (as people say) rice out the stuff under the hood. I dont car what a car looks like really as long as it goes fast. And anyway im a senior member....Respect your elders

 

[KosmikFool]

Thank you Eddie. I mean, look at those JGTC cars in Eddie's avatar. Those are race cars. And don't tell me "Well, they have stickers and crap on them!" Its because they are race cars. Not rice cars.

 

[Race Idiot]

I saw the first one, but i'd just been told that it was a 'good car movie' and I hadn't seen any trailers or anything, boy was I dissapointed. Just looking at a billboard of 2f2****ing crappious put me off.

If I want to see rice, i'll move to Essex.

 

[King_Of_SR]

MAn, the both was wack no body hit 200mph and the cars were all gangster looking but they were fake no damn good in well a viper can beat a lancer with 160 on the dash,plus Suki didn't show no ass

 

[King_Of_SR]

Yea,boi.I like skylines but I'll marry a viper.SKylines is not as fast as you think supra can beat skylines like that and viper kill supras like oj killed nicole.why the hell they put slow cars in the movie.Theyput vipers and skylines and supras in the movie but they all be slow.What the hell is that?!Jumping Bridges in **** was fire but is not worth ****ing a car over.

 

[King_Of_SR]

yea skylines this what they should be like

 

[King_Of_SR]

like this

 

[extreme car]

like this

WHOA is that your skyline???? it look so COOL!!!!! 👍 👍 👍

 

[98cobra]

Yea,boi.I like skylines but I'll marry a viper.SKylines is not as fast as you think supra can beat skylines like that and viper kill supras like oj killed nicole.why the hell they put slow cars in the movie.Theyput vipers and skylines and supras in the movie but they all be slow.What the hell is that?!Jumping Bridges in **** was fire but is not worth ****ing a car over.

I couldn't get why the Viper was in last place on that freeway race scene. It has 500hp.

 

[nk4e]

I couldn't get why the Viper was in last place on that freeway race scene. It has 500hp.

i say its the driver not the car

 

[98cobra]

i say its the driver not the car

Yeah now that you mention it, those guys in the American cars(and BMW) were crappy drivers. They kept running into crap on the freeway.

 

[98cobra]

WHOA is that your skyline???? it look so COOL!!!!! 👍 👍 👍

And it's not ricey. It has a clean body kit; nothing too crazy.

 

[demon of speed]

I found the first one to be the better of the two. But I still liked the second one, thought the gang leader was quite lame though. Although the motorway scene was quite cool with all those nice cars powering through, I found Conner's stunt was stupid and very unrealistic.

 

[Cosmic]

Both.

 

[TwinTurboJay]

Well, if you take these movies as entertainment only, and car movies....they are ok..I have both on DVD, watch them both every once in a while, mostly for the cars....the bridge jumping scene is a little lame...( ok alot lame ) beside that....oh wait, and the highway scene in part two where the evo and the eclipse are blowing away the viper and the vette, and the modified m3 and the challenger and the yenko 427....ummm, that really insults the ol'car intelligence

 

[Famine]

I'm sorry. I've just read this thread in its entirety and my brain seems to have melted.

Car chase? Go watch Bullitt.
Car movie? Go watch Vanishing Point.
Trepanning addict? Go watch 2F2F.

 

[98cobra]

oh wait, and the highway scene in part two where the evo and the eclipse are blowing away the viper and the vette, and the modified m3 and the challenger and the yenko 427....ummm, that really insults the ol'car intelligence

Yes and when the Evo and Eclipse raced the Yenko and Challenger, they would have gotten smoked if it wasn't for the NAWWWWWWWWWZZZZZZ. That's why the freeway scence is inaccurate.

 

[CAMAROBOY69]

2F2F if I had to pic.

 

[TwinTurboJay]

Yes and when the Evo and Eclipse raced the Yenko and Challenger, they would have gotten smoked if it wasn't for the NAWWWWWWWWWZZZZZZ. That's why the freeway scence is inaccurate.

That was the whole point of that scene dude, they were expecting to get smoked, thats why they had to pull out "tricks" like driving into the oncoming lane....

 

[kikkoman]

fast and furious in both forms were successful movies because they fleeced everybody; car enthusiests, hardcore fanatics and small time posers. everybody may have had a different oppinion but when it came down to it everybody paid their hard earned cash to see it.
which is better? neither, they are both equally as lame.
"r u guyz import haterz" ? i think that import fans took more offence to that movie than the import haters. i am a 'ghetto-style-abreviated-shorthand' hater
NK4E, r and u are letters, used in combination with other letters they form "words" please try to understand that.