Ferrari SF90 Stradale (F173)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProjectWHaT
  • 106 comments
  • 22,882 views
scratches head It's... Ummmm... Yeah. I dont know what to make of it to be honest. In truth i never really understood where the SF90 fitted in with the rest of their range. Calling it a Testarossa doesn't help, just ads to the confusion. I know the 80's Testarossa had little to do with it's namesake the 250 TR, but you'd think it they's at least of tied it in with some styling cues. I suppose it has that straight-edged crease from behind the front wheel extending up over the rear wheel to the tail in a similar way to the 80's Testarossa, but without the intake strakes it's a bit lost. It owes more to the 512 M than anything else.
 
Last edited:
Ferrari reveals the 849 Testarossa. Although Ferrari isn't calling it a facelift, it basically is just a refresh of the SF90




View attachment 1478211


View attachment 1478212

View attachment 1478213

View attachment 1478214

View attachment 1478215

View attachment 1478216

View attachment 1478217


Butt is nicer than the face. A car designed for chase cam.
 
I think a lot of comments for the 849 Testarossa are saying something I’ve been thinking for a while: Ferrari designs just haven’t been the same since they split with Pininfarina.
 
I think most people were expecting something like this:

1757509550599.webp

1757509606639.webp

This render looks far more like a testarossa. I'm not so much of a fan of the front end, but the rear end looks great.
 
I think most people were expecting something like this:

View attachment 1478272
View attachment 1478274
This render looks far more like a testarossa. I'm not so much of a fan of the front end, but the rear end looks great.
This looks more like a 348 than a Testarossa.

But its closer in concept than the flat12 flagship model it was supposed to remind us of with its naming.
 
I scratched my head with the black bar on the 12Cilindri, but at least on that car it kinda made sense for me...eventually. Scratched my head again at the same thing with the F80, I concluded that I'll just accept for what it is cause the car doesn't look bad....but this time around.....that 849 Testarossa is just down right ugly. I have no other reaction to it and that black bar again is most definitely not helping it!! No matter which angle I look at, it's just so ugly IMO 🤦‍♂️
 
If you told me in 1995 that 30 years from then, Ferrari would relaunch the Testarossa name and somehow make that car look even worse than the F512M, I wouldn't have believed you. And yet here we are.
 
I recall reading in the official statement from Ferrari that said the design was inspired by their sports prototypes from the 70s, like the 512. Don't get me wrong, something like the 512 looks great, but if that's where they're coming from design-wise, why call it the Testarossa? That is, unless it's a cash-grab based on the name alone. Maybe Ferrari has less integrity than I thought. I agree with what someone else said - the Lamborghini Countach LPI 800-4 from 2022 was a vastly superior execution when it came to remaking an 80s icon. I'd say something similar of the new 2023 Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale when it comes to Italian remakes. Literally every other recent design remake looks better, like the new Renault 5 Turbo 3E - I really could go on. Seriously, I know that they dropped Pininfarina around the mid-2010s, but I didn't know it'd get this bad. The only "testarossa" here is my face turning red with embarrassment and disappointment. Honestly, the 849 makes the SF90 look like the 458.

EDIT: That said, I do think the best-looking Ferrari from the post-Pininfarina period has been either the LaFerrari, the 296, the SF90, and maybe the Roma and Purosangue as well. Otherwise, I honestly feel like nothing else has come even remotely close to those, with the F80 being pretty egregious. And the Amalfi is a joke. They took what I thought was an amazing front fascia and made it look like the new Honda Prelude, which in itself does look great, but not something I'd expect from a Ferrari. Plus the other differences between the Amalfi and the Roma seem a bit too subtle.

EDIT2: Alright, I've cooled off a bit. I suppose the more iconic Testarossa from the 80s doesn't really look that much like the 250 Testarossa that preceded it, so I suppose there is a precedent for using the Testarossa name for seemingly unrelated cars for heritage's sake. I also admit that I do see the resemblance to 1970s sports prototypes, so perhaps I overreacted. I'm still disgusted with the Amalfi, though.
 
Last edited:
Yay looks like I get to have the unpopular opinion here.

It’s not a bad looking car, and I actually think it looks pretty good. The classic sports prototype proportions they’ve been going with in their recent models like the 296 GTB, SP3 Daytona and SF90 are very nice.

Giallo fits the 849, despite its full name, like a glove.

IMG_3394.webp
 
Last edited:
Yay looks like I get to have the unpopular opinion here.

It’s not a bad looking car, and I actually think it looks pretty good. The classic sports prototype proportions they’ve been going with in their recent models like the 296 GTB, SP3 Daytona and SF90 are very nice.

Giallo fits the 849, despite its full name, like a glove.

View attachment 1478604
I think I really quite like it honestly, was almost afraid to share my opinion. :lol:

For me it feels like we've spent the last decade or two complaining that Ferrari's are boring and safe, and now they're doing something different and everyone like “I wish it was boring and safe”. I feel like Ferraris most successful designs of history were their most outlandish, and the ones that were almost ridiculed when first released (F40 very much comes to mind)

I just think it looks interesting! Unique! A feature missing from so many modern supercars. Perhaps time will tell me I’m wrong but I feel like these new Ferraris will age well.
 
Yay looks like I get to have the unpopular opinion here.

It’s not a bad looking car, and I actually think it looks pretty good. The classic sports prototype proportions they’ve been going with in their recent models like the 296 GTB, SP3 Daytona and SF90 are very nice.

Giallo fits the 849, despite its full name, like a glove.

View attachment 1478604
Reminds me of a modernized version of the 288 GTO. The overall shape looks very similar, especially the front end.
 
Yay looks like I get to have the unpopular opinion here.

It’s not a bad looking car, and I actually think it looks pretty good. The classic sports prototype proportions they’ve been going with in their recent models like the 296 GTB, SP3 Daytona and SF90 are very nice.

Giallo fits the 849, despite its full name, like a glove.

View attachment 1478604
It’s like the car is pulling up its skirt.

I’ll get me coat…
 
scratches head It's... Ummmm... Yeah. I dont know what to make of it to be honest. In truth i never really understood where the SF90 fitted in with the rest of their range. Calling it a Testarossa doesn't help, just ads to the confusion. I know the 80's Testarossa had little to do with it's namesake the 250 TR, but you'd think it they's at least of tied it in with some styling cues. I suppose it has that straight-edged crease from behind the front wheel extending up over the rear wheel to the tail in a similar way to the 80's Testarossa, but without the intake strakes it's a bit lost. It owes more to the 512 M than anything else.
Did anybody care in the 80s when the 80s GTO and Testarossa showed up with zero styling cues from the 250 GTO & 250 TR?

I agree that the design is very reminiscent of the 512 M, those rear haunches especially. It's not a great design, bit awkward in it's proportions, but I don't find it as objectionable as many seem to.
 
Did anybody care in the 80s when the 80s GTO and Testarossa showed up with zero styling cues from the 250 GTO & 250 TR?
Most of us weren't alive then lol. And I certainly don't know anybody who can offer their thoughts on it at the time.

I can imagine some people being shocked, however it would be more like the shock of the Corvette between C7 and C8 because the 1980s GTO and Testarossa were fundamentally completely different cars than the classics. The entire point was Ferrari was transitioning to this mid-engined supersports layout to increase performance. But now that all these cars have been the same layout for so long, it's much easier to compare this Testarossa to the 80s version because the basic layout as a mid-engined supercar is the same.

And what I can say is that this one is more lame than the old one. It's turbocharged, doesn't have 12 cylinders, and graphical is god-awful ugly.

Edit: I would just like to note that this lineage of car is so lame that the SF90XX debuted over two years ago in this thread, nobody cared, and the next post is literally "The SF90 is dead".
 
Back