Formula 1 2009: The Launch Season
- Thread starter Metar
- 601 comments
- 40,935 views
- Status
- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
KSaiyu
(Banned)
- 2,822
Also, McLaren have been experimenting with a cut floor too, another area where teams can change a bit, as the rules state something along the lines of "engine parts cannot be visible from underneath the car", which allows some cars to cut parts of their floor out for additional air flow. Not all teams can do this without massively changing their sidepods though.
The Brawn car can do it though I think.
I was hoping this would be posted here.
The technical analysis by autosport mentions the downforce generated by the diffuser is from the "kick-line between the diffuser/floor" and leading edge, and by using this cut floor it would move the leading edge backwards hence the downforce more rearwards.
Pardon my ignorance, but I've only heard of the leading edge of a diffuser, which I've assumed to be the part where the curve begins. What is this kick-line ahead of the leading edge and can anyone explain how this cut floor would be able to move the downforce further back?
- 1,134
- NapoleonMikey
I was hoping this would be posted here.
The technical analysis by autosport mentions the downforce generated by the diffuser is from the "kick-line between the diffuser/floor" and leading edge, and by using this cut floor it would move the leading edge backwards hence the downforce more rearwards.
Pardon my ignorance, but I've only heard of the leading edge of a diffuser, which I've assumed to be the part where the curve begins. What is this kick-line ahead of the leading edge and can anyone explain how this cut floor would be able to move the downforce further back?
not sure what a kick-line is but it looks to not really move the downforce further back in the sence that your removing downforce from the front and moving it rearwards. instead just adding more down force to the back by adding another small wing/flap to the back of the car. or at least thats what im getting out of it.
but looking at the 2 pictures of the area it looks like the way its desinged would cause lift to me. also it looks like it would be pushing air under the rear tire which i think would cause a loss of traction. then that would also explain why the "wind" keeps causing hamilton to crash.
- 1,058
- Perth, WA
I was hoping this would be posted here.
The technical analysis by autosport mentions the downforce generated by the diffuser is from the "kick-line between the diffuser/floor" and leading edge, and by using this cut floor it would move the leading edge backwards hence the downforce more rearwards.
Pardon my ignorance, but I've only heard of the leading edge of a diffuser, which I've assumed to be the part where the curve begins. What is this kick-line ahead of the leading edge and can anyone explain how this cut floor would be able to move the downforce further back?
Not Ignorant at all. I cannot vouch for complete veracity in this answer to your question (I'm only experienced at aerodynamics when applied to lift, downforce, while also working on the same formula, is confusing in an F1 car with so much aero), but I will try.
I believe that McLaren have created the leading edge (which is the term for the front edge of any aerofoil section) to create a flow into the diffuser or over the rear wing, clean up airflow over rear tyres, or create a minimal amount of induced drag and skien friction. I believe it is the last one
If air must follow a curve for a long time it will often develop a turbulent flow, whereas McLaren, by keeping this flow on small aerofoil sections, have kept a more laminar flow, allowing the airflow to move cleanly along the car, minimising induced drag.
Can people please correct (my knowledge is limited to pilot training, I'm no aerodynamicist) any mistakes in this explanation. This is my hypothesis, but I would like to know the actual reason... And please don't bash, I'm just trying to help...
- 7,719
Craig Scarborough, RCE reporter, confirmed the same, and it makes sense - by now, cars need to be as finalized as possible, since they don't want nasty surprises of parts not bringing a benefit on a Friday.
I don't quite understand the complete details on this part, but a lot of it has to do with the interactions between the floor and the rotating wheel, creating small amounts of downforce - but truly negligible drag considering the drag created by the wheel.
KSaiyu
(Banned)
- 2,822
Interesting, the minimal drag penalty you all note is also mentioned by autosport. This scan is of the F2007 in Giorgio Piola's Technical Analysis book and I'm trying to see if this might shed any light on where this "kick-line" is as mentioned in the article and how the re-designed floor would move the downforce rearwards - something I suspect McLaren need in their car more than most.
By the way,This is the autosport article
Have to remember that the diffuser starts at the rear wheel centreline this year so it would be further back than the pic and the designs will obviously be different.
By the way,This is the autosport article
Have to remember that the diffuser starts at the rear wheel centreline this year so it would be further back than the pic and the designs will obviously be different.
- 8,196
- Drayton Bassett, North Warwickshire
- Duffers999
- Clark Duffy
- 127
They shouldn't have let Adrian Newey go...
- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
Actually, I'dsay they'd be in about the same position if Newey were still with them as he traditionally takes a whle to get his hea around the new regulations.
- 10,373
- Manchester
- Ardius_
You mean like 1998?
I thought the awesome-ness about Newey was that he's best in large regulation changes rather than small ones...hence why the Red Bull looks great.
Blake
Premium
- 10,976
- NSW, Australia
- haswell00
His reputation is almost the opposite. Hes a genius and you can count on him to come up with ideas no one else has. As long as you have someone to keep him on a leash and make it all nice and workable (Geoff Willis), it should be a pretty good car.
I think McLarens strength is in its depth though, so losing someone like Newey probably isnt a problem for them at all. That said, if their performance is rubbish this year then that could be very debatable, because this would be the first car that isn't building on the principles of Neweys MP4/20 (at least not so much).
- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
- 1,264
- coming soon
- Tezuka18
Being a member in the Order of the British Empire is supposed to be a serious honor, right?
Last edited:
- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
- 1,058
- Perth, WA
Because you dont.
Well Argued! I was not intending to defame Hamilton: an MBE is still quite an acheivement. But it is like buying a 1.8 TT, and loving to tell people about it, until one day you are talking about your TT to someone and they say "Oh yes, I've got the 3.2. Lovely car eh? Which one do you have?" For the sake of Hamilton's ego, I hope that he doesn't have this happen...
ExigeEvan
Premium
- 17,192
Because if you're nice, and keep getting your Boxter serviced at the Dealership, one day they might give you a huge discount on a Carrera GT?
And lets be fair, who doesn't want to have a few extra letters behind their name? Hell when I eventually get chartered I'm going to put CEng down everywhere, and damn what anyone says.
- 84,445
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
- 10,373
- Manchester
- Ardius_
- 15,481
- UK
So they should have had their MBE's taken back?
They had won the Ashes for the first time in 20 years, it was a fantastic achievement (scrape? Probably, but you don't thrash sides as good as that). Can't say I care in the slightest about these types of medals, but you can't berate someone for wanting to highlight their success.
- Status
