Possibly development time considering they seem to be intent on adding cars every month, otherwise one could argue why donn't they just delay the game to add the cars from November or December as well. Has to be a cut-off point so the game can actually ship.
I'll take everything in that line up except the tarted-up Tahoe on the end.I had to do a double take, I thought that was a real picture.
That's what I thought lol
When I first saw the photo on my xb1 I thought the same.
I had to do a double take, I thought that was a real picture.
Whooaaa steady on there, we don't know whether or not we pay cr for them yet!So many free cars, remember the good old times when we started off with a crappy Chevy Spark? Yeah.
Well evo (or car?) magazine mentioned their Clio Williams being modelled ages ago, so not sure this is the case
Thought it was based on a GMC Yukon.
Take into account licensing isn't always a simple & straight-forward thing to accomplish, though.
It, the Tahoe, & the Cadillac are all built on the K2XX platform amongst others.
What does that have to do with anything? Licensing doesn't work the same for every car....Tut tut
Anyways Maybe it is down to licensing, but then there's the f100, the escalade, the GNX, the 595 and the mustang. These have all Been in forza before
Licensing is a possible issue for the Clio. The other 5 aren't simply ported & may need to be re-worked for the game by T10/PG, going back to what I said earlier; development time. Licensing is also very much a possible issue. You don't get a free pass from game-to-game.
It's almost certain you have agenda, then. Looks like we're done.
He listed quiet a few other things that could be the problem.
No, it surely can't be licensing or development, or anything reasonable. It's just a case of "LOL, Microsoft".
Last 5? So what about any car that happens to come in later as DLC that was part of the other games? Judging by the last two games DLC-strategy its more then likely. Either way, your just picking the worse possible reason, with no actual evidence, only making it seem like what @McLaren said, "LOL, Microsoft."
That's what I thought lol
Whooaaa steady on there, we don't know whether or not we pay cr for them yet!
One more thing before I give the dlc handling thing up.
I'm really not dismissing the reasons for what's what, but I'm honestly not happy with how Microsoft has made you pay for cars from previous series'. Remodelled or not, you shouldn't pay for something that's the same (meaning the vehicle) again. You cannot justify. For example, the transit superman being a dlc three times. Once is enough for any car.
So when I see a launch dlc thingy like this, you can surely forgive me for suspecting the worst. And, @ImaRobot if they do, like you said, add cars from older games and charge, I will be upset with the decision.
Will I still buy the dlc? Microsoft damn well knows I will
I've responded to statements like this before, and so far I've never received a valid response:
This is irrelevant because Other games manage to not charge players a second time for content. Forza, being bankrolled by Microsoft, has the least excuse to do this of them all, and yet it's the one racer that does it. At this point it becomes an obsession for cash over simply getting by.
Every game has their problems and mishaps, just like GT charging for paint chips. The problem is not isolated to Microsoft, but the game industry in a whole.
You are totally correct, I'm just pointing out Forzas little Achilles heel.
Not when "I don't care" is your primary response. You're past reasoning with.
