So what you're saying is that they're both look like they're from 2006?Here is the difference between in game model of Forza and GTS, same tod and lighting. Just to show the difference in LOD for people that think its better in GTS and don't forget to look at the dynamic shadows vs static shadows.
People here need to relax and think before they post, all you guys do is go off topic and start unnecessary discussion.
With dynamic NightANDOR rain at that. "But but but, we have SS Route X, and it doesn't look 2006" Gotta love try hards.
Here is the difference between in game model of Forza and GTS, same tod and lighting. Just to show the difference in LOD for people that think its better in GTS and don't forget to look at the dynamic shadows vs static shadows.
People here need to relax and think before they post, all you guys do is go off topic and start unnecessary discussion.
Differences in Anti-aliasing, Different with interior textures and shaders and even missing parts all together in the interior, more precise shadows. What's hard to tell is if it's actually the Anti-aliasing, or if we're seeing a difference in LOD, since the AA seems so bad in game.Not at all lol,stop saying falsities.
Regarding forza screnshots post a comparision yourself so we can see the truth...
Which used to be labeled as a bad thing for Forza, in the past. Funny how that seemed to have switched.
What are you trying to demonstrade with this?Difference between a game that runs on a more powerfull hardware ond the other that runs on a weaker one? i thoughtWe were discussing about differences between photomode and ingameHere is the difference between in game model of Forza and GTS, same tod and lighting. Just to show the difference in LOD for people that think its better in GTS and don't forget to look at the dynamic shadows vs static shadows.
People here need to relax and think before they post, all you guys do is go off topic and start unnecessary discussion.
Im just showing lod difference nothing more, and there is no game in 2006 that look like these 2.
Lol you played yourself,look at the interior and the bumper thats a different lod.Not at all lol,stop saying falsities.
Regarding forza screnshots post a comparision yourself so we can see the truth...
You started that with GTS didn't have much difference in photomode compared to gameplay. And here is the diffrence in game vs photomode in Forza
Well that's because you asked for in-game shots instead because you didn't like the photomode picture of Forza to be compared to the photomode picture of GT, so you got them. You literally asked for these, what's confusing about this?
Im just showing lod difference nothing more, and there is no game in 2006 that look like these 2.
Lol you played yourself,look at the interior and the bumper thats a different lod.
GTS gameplay
GTS photomode
look at the water reflection, car lod, interior, resolution, roads and track side details, they all improved. And you are the one saying falsities not me, i proved all my points unlike you.
Yeah on reflexes two kilometers away that hardly improve the image where in forza that runs on a more powerful hardware the reflexes are added also on the car wagon...Im just showing lod difference nothing more, and there is no game in 2006 that look like these 2.
Lol you played yourself,look at the interior and the bumper thats a different lod.
GTS gameplay
GTS photomode
look at the water reflection, car lod, interior, resolution, roads and track side details, they all improved. And you are the one saying falsities not me,.
Why would we compare it at it's worse? So it's ok to use the PS4 Pro but not the Xbox One X? You're moving the goalposts so much it's ridiculous. Why don't we just use the best console for each comparison?
No, what you've shown is that it actually had less differences. That' was then backed up by the photomode and gameplay shot of the Mclaren literally right above your post. You said GTS doesn't do any of those things, which was proven wrong as well.
Well that's a convenient point to note, isn't it?
Can you show me an environement where the car body can reflect an object, like near a tree or a gallery, and possibly do a screenshot before entering the photomode menuYou started that with GTS didn't have much difference in photomode compared to gameplay. And here is the diffrence in game vs photomode in Forza
What's a lie about that?
Again fake low setting image, i dont own the F&F car pack but you can even see in a youtube footage that the detail is there and that your image is not from the game on ultra.Yeah on reflexes two kilometers away that hardly improve the image where in forza that runs on a more powerful hardware the reflexes are added also on the car wagon...
here is forza on a weaker hardware:
No you were saying that on forza the difference is minimal, but my screenshots tells different story, now post yours im waiting
I am a GT fan too, i grew with GT, i play them all and like them all equally but last 2 months some of them are really just trolling in Forza threads. You should look at there post history you will understand, they keep posting random stuff in Forza threads the whole time to start unnecessary discussion.
Its not fake lol, it is footage taken from the xbox one and that proves that photomode in forza on lower hardwares is like another game...as for the fanboy thing,here i see it has no consequnces to insult other peoples as far as they saying something bad to forza...intersting
Yeah but make up your mind, geez. You first wanted in game shots so you got them, but as soon as you did you shoot them down asking why they were posted? Then you posted on “PC ULTRA” making that comparison, but as soon as you were shown that you were wrong you now switch to “oh yeah, well maybe lower versions don’t!” You’re flip flopping all over the place, and so far, most everything you’ve posted has been false for not only Forza, but GT as well.
...I didn't even say this???
Sorry i misquoted
Fix it then.
