- 502
- PositionZero
- Endemictr
Whoa Jinx, you pwned the thread!
Jinx. You doin' it right. 👍👍
Thanks guys:tup:
Whoa Jinx, you pwned the thread!
Jinx. You doin' it right. 👍👍
Here is my TTs rockin' some BBS RS's in white. Wish I could go lower with this car, or at least tuck the wheels a little more. Still the fitment in the rear is great, I just have a wee-bit to much camber. Doesn't seem as stanced as Jinx's RS6 thoughHe totally just owned us all in this thread. lolz
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm all for doing just about whatever floats your boat in terms of modifying your car to fit your tastes...but I just cannot get my head around the idea of performing modifications, or setups that could be so severely detrimental to the actual performance of the car....
it just baffles me...
And one more thing...all this focusing on the wheels, and wheel arches...really highlights Polyphony Digital's absolutely inability to model round objects...
So it doesn't really matter if we rock stretched tires, go low as we can, have more camber then we're supposed to...
Excessive camber on a daily driver doesn't matter? lol
Excessive camber on a daily driver doesn't matter? lol
This is my preferred stance. . .I also prefer stances that WORK on tracks the require speed....not a looks/show person at all.
Some of this trendy crap is from kids that are completely CLUELESS to what it takes to make a car work on a track.
The old saying with Function comes Form.........if you Form has no fuction then your wasting time and part of the "LOOK AT ME" crowd.
Be something and not look like something, empty shallow holes of what could be filled with substance. . . .hahahaha
Preach on preacher.
If you cant get over a speedbump normally, it's lost it's function.