I hear they hate others enjoying video games too
Ahm so there’s a little misunderstanding here, I replied to you, but it build up on the comment of ScottPuss20. I sure also confused both of you, so I read with a different background. So if you felt attacked by me, that is comprehensible and I apologize.
Nah, they more than once said this game is built from the ground up with not going into detail. So no I disagree, you can’t blame the customer for them making attention grabbing marketing, not everyone is reading every article or watches every video they release where they maybe explain what their definition of „built from the ground up“ actually means.
I can blame the customer for for thinking it means "there is nothing at all reused from the previous game".
I reacted in kind. If it's not the response you prefer to get then try commenting and creating an actual discussion instead of throwing what can easily be seen as a fit.
It is entirely your fault and easily able to come off in such a way when you wildly dismiss points with little reason and instead choose to cus like a sailor instead, all the while arguing points that I never even made. Instead of approaching this situation more level headed.
I wasn't talking about the comments that came before that, because there was none.
When I dont understand the concept that you dont? I'm not even sure what that means here.
It's just how the industry works, that's why I said prior that no one should be reading too far into this marketing talk. It's the same when GT said there would be no microtransactions in their game, let all the reviewers get a hold of a copy and make their decisions, and then implement microtransactions immediately after release in order to have less negative spotlight. There's other instances as well, but the point remains the same. Neither company here are against using tactics like that.
The line is „don’t use car models that are obviously out of date (and out of proportions) fir a long time“. We can agree that reusing car models isn’t a inexcusable sacrilege, but using car models that were already outdated in its 7 year old predecessor, especially in a game that gets marketed again and again with the phrase „built from the ground up“, is just bs. If the point is reached where it has to be redone, than it has to be redone, or leave it out of the game till it’s ready. I mean what „progress“ do you mean? These car models ain’t „progress“ anymore, they are the opposite.
I agree the Gr.1 is a mess when they mix all those categories together and they can fix this rather easily too
The only thing I want to point out is that these cars are so far and few inbetween, but everyone always talks about it like it's the vast majority of the game. I'm not disagreeing that there's dated models, but there needs to be better scope on these things when people talk about them.
Outright visuals are not what drive the genre forward. It falters quite heavily when you consider the single player portion of the game, how it's structured, and how it's economy influences heavy grinding just to afford a single car. One of the very few things I appreciate about Forza 23 is the restructured economy when it comes to vehicle prices. Though that's not enough incentive for me to want to pick the game up.
No game will be future proof as the technology moves too fast. PD themselves have proved that.
Is your Playstation/game offline somehow? Maybe try turning off and on again.
Turns out it's a known issue, as mentioned by Famine here and Mikail Hizal on Twitter. One that isn't on the known issues list, and one that PD doesn't know how to fix. So we'll see if it gets fixed on the 25th, I guess.
I just completed all the events and I didn’t get my rewards either.
Well for one thing the GT90 was made quite a long time ago and has therefore developed a cult following. The sentimental value of the car far outweighs that of any VGT and let me tell you, people will lose their minds if PD put it in. It's not about the performance, it's about the story and the GT90 has a good one that would immediately make it a fantastic addition. VGT's don't connect to us in the same way, hence why they're shunned so often. Admit it, driving the GT90 would feel a lot more special than any VGT. You may not want to agree for the sake of the argument but I know deep down that you'd prefer it.
Nice set-up there, so you can pretend I'm lying when I say I wouldn't - but I wouldn't.
You sure do like to assume other people's thoughts and intent.
Okay Scott, this is honestly an absurd argument. The sentimental value of the GT90 and connections it has with people was gained overtime. Your argument here sounds like you think VGTs could not achieve that same sentimentality when you wouldn't be able to tell that; people can be getting attached to some of these concepts as we speak.
I was going to reply almost the exact same way but was having trouble wording it effectively.
