- 24,462
- United States
- GTP_Jordan
- GTP_Jordan
This is the discussion thread for an article on GTPlanet:


“Vision GT is celebrating its 10th anniversary this year, and across 10 years there are close to 40 cars that have been created through that. And by doing that, people are starting to realize the value of that activity and project.
So for those players we have given them a game that has to be always connected, and has virtually no content without an internet connection, and the content we have given the is nowhere near the depth of previous (pre GT Sport) GT games.“There is of course a lot of traditional Gran Turismo players who have been playing since GT1, and those players prefer to play offline.
Mmm, I don't think so for the single offline player. The game design and progression was there before, and they decided to ignore that for a shallow experience. They have the tracks, they have the cars, setting out a progression system is the easy part. Adding to that over time should be even easier, as it is more challenges, more mini race series, and maybe the odd innovation or surprise.To try and cover all of their demands and needs is very difficult, actually,”
Be experimental and avant-garde, but build that on top of a proper core game. In addition to, not instead of.“Gran Turismo has always been very experimental and avant-garde, but to convey a lot of different values, it takes time.
You don't mention that while you are still selling the current game. And you do not mention the length of support for that game either, especially when it is connected to the support for its content. Buy GT7, because our new game will be out in 2 years time!Not a single word about the next Gran Turismo? It could be nice just to know for how long they want to support gt7 and if they are already in full production for gt8.
Just in response to the VGT cars. I think he’s refering to the car designers and now, other types of consumer luxury brands answering the call of promotion. Probably, at this stage, players using the VGT cars isnt really a factor.Can all the people who regularly use the GT Vision cars please make yourself known, because apparently it is a significant part of Gran Turismo to Kazunori Yamauchi. I always saw it as a way of advertising GT by getting different company's to imagine vehicles, and simulate them in a game. Promotes GT and the company, but betond that... Their use in the game, because they followed no framework or limits, was limited to say the least imho. Maybe I'm wrong and people are using them all the time.
So for those players we have given them a game that has to be always connected, and has virtually no content without an internet connection, and the content we have given the is nowhere near the depth of previous (pre GT Sport) GT games.
Mmm, I don't think so for the single offline player. The game design and progression was there before, and they decided to ignore that for a shallow experience. They have the tracks, they have the cars, setting out a progression system is the easy part. Adding to that over time should be even easier, as it is more challenges, more mini race series, and maybe the odd innovation or surprise.
And there is still no justification for having a game constantly connected to the internet for its content to be available and useable.
Be experimental and avant-garde, but build that on top of a proper core game. In addition too, not instead of.
Even for the online racer, which I am not, there is seems to be too much repetition of the same track/car class races repeated often, with some tracks and cars hardly ever used, from what I have seen and heard. Again, there are a lot of cars and tracks to choose from, do all the combinations. Why be so repetitive!
Gran Turismo, the real advertising opportunity.Just in response to the VGT cars. I think he’s refering to the car designers and now, other types of consumer luxury brands answering the call of promotion. Probably, at this stage, players using the VGT cars isnt really a factor.
Seeing the value in this particular game, extending their advertising reach.
It's not a question of people them using all the time or not, that's hardly a fair requirement for them being justified as I'm sure there's a great many people that haven't regularly used most of the cars in the game.Can all the people who regularly use the GT Vision cars please make yourself known, because apparently it is a significant part of Gran Turismo to Kazunori Yamauchi. I always saw it as a way of advertising GT by getting different company's to imagine vehicles, and simulate them in a game. Promotes GT and the company, but betond that... Their use in the game, because they followed no framework or limits, was limited to say the least imho. Maybe I'm wrong and people are using them all the time.
Vision GT is celebrating its 10th anniversary this year, and across 10 years there are close to 40 cars that have been created through that. And by doing that, people are starting to realize the value of that activity and project.
I find it pretty strange Kaz thinks of VGT as a noteworthy achievement for the franchise to mention in the larger context of the franchise.Just in response to the VGT cars. I think he’s refering to the car designers and now, other types of consumer luxury brands answering the call of promotion. Probably, at this stage, players using the VGT cars isnt really a factor.
At the World Tour, the translation from Kaz’ comment on the Genesis VGT, was the first time I heard him asking for a specific VGT to be made.
Seeing the value in this particular game, extending their advertising reach.
Yes, VR2You don't mention that while you are still selling the current game. And you do not mention the length of support for that game either, especially when it is connected to the support for its content. Buy GT7, because our new game will be out in 2 years time!
For me, the slow down of additional content each month, even compared to GT Sport, is an indication that they are working on the next game. Whether that will be on the PS5 or Sony's next console is anyone's guess. I personally think the next game only being on the PS5 would be a very hard sell. Without an increase in the technology of what a new console brings, what would they next GT offer over GT7 with the same technology running it. Seemingly gone are the days of significant software improvements during the lifetime of a console. Is the PS5 offering a massive difference to most GT players than GT7 on PS4!
Yep. This is me also in a nutshell. I don't give two ***** about online, and **** all about photo mode. Give me a campaign on par with GT4 again and I'll be over the moon. That's LITERALLY all Kaz has to do. He refuses.Gran Turismo is Car Porn.
Loved it from GT1 on and we had a very long relationship. I am playing GT7, but it doesn't feel really good.
I hate to play online, when those kiddies kick you out in the first corner and ruin your race right at the start. And I hate the kiddies with their 3rd account, who are giggling about those dumbasses that are too slow.
Very funny...
I don't have the time anymore for such ******** and I don't have fun with that.
There is no good campaign in GT7, but you can shoot a photo in 48k!
No, for me it's sometimes fun to drive a few races. But I notice, that this is not the feeling I had back in the days.
The story of GT is told out for me.
I think this is a fair point. If I put on my optimistic hat and think through on why the VGT feature exists in GT, then I believe that it could be interpreted as more than just a promotional exercise. It may be how Kaz is thinking about courting influential incumbents that are at the heart of our motorsport passion. And signaling to them to join an evolving digital platform that is mindful of creating synergies with mutually benefiting value propositions. If it all works well, Kaz/GT is looked upon as a sophisticated entity that understands how to partner with icons in motorsport.It's easy to try and undermine it as simply promotion, or cynical marketing exercises, but that intentionally belittles the interest or affection that many petrol heads have for concept cars, which is daft if it's just because it's one you don't share. Often this seems to be fuelled by the notion that if we didn't get a VGT we'd get some other much requested car, but there's basically zero evidence to support this idea.
I find it pretty strange Kaz thinks of VGT as a noteworthy achievement for the franchise to mention in the larger context of the franchise.
I used to like the direction he provided for gran turismo but comments like this make me cringe. Maybe he’s more marketeer now than racer.
Taking on new challenges such as becoming a legitimate advertising platform for luxury brands.
I am not surprised at these comments, and to be perfectly honest, the fans have the right to callout PD. After all, we are the ones that enable him financially to purse his calling.Yep. This is me also in a nutshell. I don't give two ***** about online, and **** all about photo mode. Give me a campaign on par with GT4 again and I'll be over the moon. That's LITERALLY all Kaz has to do. He refuses.
The limits and framework most of the non Gr cars have is that they have been designed to fit a niche in the market, and have been designed to 'compete' in the real world market against each other, and so a similar in design, power, weight and performance so that they can be used to race against each other. Some the VGT cars have nothing close in terms of power and performance.It's not a question of people them using all the time or not, that's hardly a fair requirement for them being justified as I'm sure there's a great many people that haven't regularly used most of the cars in the game.
With the exception of Gr. cars most other cars in the game don't fit any kind of 'framework' that the VGT's don't also, and although you say no limits, there obviously were self imposed limits on the majority of the cars as, despite popular perception, they're not all 16 cylinder 'spaceships'.
My argument against the VGT is not that they are blocking another type of car from being introduced, which they obviously are, as they have said they are limited by how many new cars they can produce, no, it is that they are too different to each other. Put some restrictions to the designers to at least give options that could compete with each other.It's easy to try and undermine it as simply promotion, or cynical marketing exercises, but that intentionally belittles the interest or affection that many petrol heads have for concept cars, which is daft if it's just because it's one you don't share. Often this seems to be fuelled by the notion that if we didn't get a VGT we'd get some other much requested car, but there's basically zero evidence to support this idea. There's been 3 GT titles dedicated to Concept cars at Motorshows, there's been none dedicated to GT3, SuperGT, Le Mans, F1 or any other category people want to rÆÆÆÆpost wishlists for... that should surely give a people a clue as to whether their expectations of the franchise were well reasoned or not.
yahh, so true... and this comment from the article ""with complaints of both a shallow singler-player mode from one group of players,"" is insulting! Players have a right to complain about the shallow SP mode and demand more given that the (dishonest) pre launch marketing heralded GT7 as a "return to roots Gran Turismo" - that had old skoolers so excited... What a lie!Yep. This is me also in a nutshell. I don't give two ***** about online, and **** all about photo mode. Give me a campaign on par with GT4 again and I'll be over the moon. That's LITERALLY all Kaz has to do. He refuses.
That is what everyone said after GT Sport, and look what we have! And they don't seem to know, or are interested in, how they have ****** this up. Giving them a pass on this game could really impact on them in the future. They could easily fix a lot of the problems now, but they either don't see problems, and if they do, they have chosen to do very little about them.I can see them doing a better single player career for next game,
Sophy being ready or not has nothing to do with the basic design of the game. It is not too late to fix it, but if they wait how many years till the next game, I for one will be way past caring. If they don't see the problems now, in all likelihood that next game would be the same, or make even worse, because eh, they sold x million games.It would make no sense to spend all this time to dial in sophy if they didin’t plan to use it, but i dont see it happening in gt7 sadly, and sophy ai that its not ready yet might be one of the reasons why they have not put that much effort into the single player career, outside of the single player and maybe a bit of economy is not the gretest in gt7, but many of the other aspects pd have really nailed,
I think he’s genuine in being amazed VGT are still being developed. I really don’t know if he may feel turning away luxury brands would hurt the connections to the franchise.I find it pretty strange Kaz thinks of VGT as a noteworthy achievement for the franchise to mention in the larger context of the franchise.
I used to like the direction he provided for gran turismo but comments like this make me cringe. Maybe he’s more marketeer now than racer.
What you reference here may indeed be Kaz's equation, but when you are not clear about expressing your intent and continuously avoid the expressed needs from veteran fans, you risk developing things that may cause friction with your fanbase.I think he’s genuine in being amazed VGT are still being developed. I really don’t know if he may feel turning away luxury brands would hurt the connections to the franchise.
Look at the For Not Your Eyes Only Dior apparel. Maybe Kaz feels this helps the GT brand. Maybe that’s helping extend car culture to consumers that don’t care for car culture any longer.