- 3,987

- Gaithersburg/MD
- landseaair
I'm disappointed about the lack of airplanes, but I do wonder if that includes helicopters too? Size of the map isn't a big deal to me since this will be so much more detailed than before.
No countryside or desert? Aw nuts! I hope they make up for it with plenty of parkland for off-roading.The map is smaller than San Andreas, but a hell of a lot more detailed. No countryside or desert.
That doesn't make sense. There's planes in Vice City Stories and there's only one city in that game.Apparently there are no planes because there is only one city in the game.
The "use" of planes is simply an alternative for flying around the map apart from helicopters - not as a transport between cities, although they can be used as that, just like cars, boats and helicopters can be used for transport between cities. I regularly use(d) planes in San Andreas and it wasn't just for a shortcut between cities - it was just fun and useful to have a plane for screwing around in - flying in between buildings, a quick route to the top of Mt. Chiliad, stunting around and under bridges, flybys over Area 69 to arouse the authorities, etc. The fact that there's only one city isn't a good reason to exclude planes. As long as the map is big enough, planes are a cool addition as a much faster, but less manouevarable and harder to land alternative to helicopters. We don't need to have 747s or anything, just a similar selection to the airplanes in San Andreas.Also, don't get too disheartened about no planes. I'm almost positive there will be helicopters, but there's no use for planes in only one city.
Yeah, that's understandable, and I do think a few people will be a bit disappointed with that, but the game is moving in a different direction (though without trying to lose the feel of Grand Theft Auto as we know it). I think they're looking for more realism and a distinct feel, and although having planes in the game once again might be fun, it's not a necessity and I'd think that as soon as people play the game, they probably won't be as disappointed as they are prior to the game's release.KMThe "use" of planes is simply an alternative for flying around the map apart from helicopters - not as a transport between cities, although they can be used as that, just like cars, boats and helicopters can be used for transport between cities. I regularly use(d) planes in San Andreas and it wasn't just for a shortcut between cities - it was just fun and useful to have a plane for screwing around in - flying in between buildings, a quick route to the top of Mt. Chiliad, stunting around and under bridges, flybys over Area 69 to arouse the authorities, etc. The fact that there's only one city isn't a good reason to exclude planes. As long as the map is big enough, planes are a cool addition as a much faster, but less manouevarable and harder to land alternative to helicopters. We don't need to have 747s or anything, just a similar selection to the airplanes in San Andreas.
He pushes his way through the back door and smashes the window of a red four-door car using his elbow. The broken glass falls onto the street and onto the seat of the car, as Bellic unlocks it from the inside. He hotwires the car and sets off to his next destination.
Wasn't Driver: Parallel Lines in New York too?
No planes don't bother me at all, I never really liked the planes in GTA SA. Although I did enjoy the jetpacks for fun replay value.
The best part of the planes was that they allowed you to easily use the parachutes. Flying them was a dull but quick way of getting around, jumping out of them was far more fun.
Regards
Scaff
Im also hoping there are other locations in GTA IV other than NY.
edit, I just read the article on the previous page... hmm abit dissapointed and NO PLANES!!!
That doesn't make sense. There's planes in Vice City Stories and there's only one city in that game.![]()
edit: Even GTA3 and Vice City gave you a plane to fly thought those games consisted of a single city. If Rockstar have decided to exclude planes from GTAIV, it's not because "there's only one city in the game".
So you have a secret missile base that blows the crap out of any planes that fly near.I suspect it's because of what that one city is. All you'd need is someone Youtubing a video of himself nailing a passenger jet into a skyscraper and Jack Thompson would 🤬 his lips in apoplexy. And get support.
Ah, I hadn't thought of that. I'm sure all sorts of people have had fun crashing the flyable passenger jet in San Andreas into buildings.I suspect it's because of what that one city is. All you'd need is someone Youtubing a video of himself nailing a passenger jet into a skyscraper and Jack Thompson would 🤬 his lips in apoplexy. And get support.
It might be because GTA has already had enough negative publicity and outrage thrown at it that they don't want any more.(And couldn't you do something like that in MS Flight Sim?)
Actually, New York has only 2 major airports : The JFK airport, and LaGuardia International airport. The other nearest one is in Newark, New Jersey and it's called Newark International Airport.But New York has 3 major airports!
JFK, La Guardia and another who's name I forget.
Surely they could encorporate that in somewhere along the way.
Now that's hot!, less time wasted is always a plus.matthewjlcoleman* After an initial load sequence, the game will never load again. Not even during exterior-interior transitions (and vice versa).
I suspect it's because of what that one city is. All you'd need is someone Youtubing a video of himself nailing a passenger jet into a skyscraper and Jack Thompson would 🤬 his lips in apoplexy. And get support.