Grand Theft Auto IV

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christhedude
  • 2,251 comments
  • 147,642 views
One thing is for sure, we will know soon enough how different these editions truly are, and like others, I will be very surprised, and certainly disappointed if it turns out RockStar dumbs down the PS3 version in order to make both versions the same. One think I really dislike is when companies lower the quality and/or cripple products in order to meet the limitations of the lowest common denominator. 👎


I agree. :)




Hmm some new news, a possible reason why the Xbox360 is getting exclusive content


http://www.thegtaplace.com
Microsoft Paid $50 Million for GTA IV DLC

If you're wondering why it seems that only the Xbox 360 version of Grand Theft Auto IV is getting downloadable content, the reason is possibly because Microsoft have paid a whopping fifty million dollars for it.

Stock analysis website SeekingAlpha have referenced last weeks press release from Take-Two regarding it's financial results and a conference call in relation to that, where it is revealed that the $50 million "Deferred revenue" figure is actually coming from Microsoft, who will pay Take-Two $25 million for one downloadable episode in March '08 and the other $25 million later on in fiscal '08 for the second episode. We can assume from this that these are likely to be the dates when we will actually receive the content, although it's not certain.
It's a long article to read in full but this is the quote which confirms the above:

as it relates to the deferred revenue chunk associated with the episodic content on X-Box 360, you can see that $25 million of that moved into short-term deferred. Could you give us any sense of when that’s going to hit the P&L? Will we see $25 million at one time and then the second 25 or will it be a slow bleed?

The first 25 is for the first episodic content package that’s supposed to go out and that is in March of '08. That’s why it moved into current because it’s in the next 12 months. The second 25 will be for the second episodic, the episode, and that will be later in fiscal '08.
This screenshot below shows part of the financial results with the deferred revenue figure being talked about above: (in '000s)

50million_dlc.jpg




What we're trying to work out is where exactly Microsoft are getting their money back and profiting from this. Clearly they are doing this to help sell consoles as well as copies of the game, but even then, not everybody is going to buy the content, which will presumably be priced at 800 points (that's $10) - So 5 million people would have to download the content just for Microsoft to break even.
It is quite interesting as you very rarely hear of companies making public how much exclusivity deals are worth, and you have to wonder how much Microsoft pay out for every exclusive they want.
http://www.thegtaplace.com/
 
What we're trying to work out is where exactly Microsoft are getting their money back and profiting from this. Clearly they are doing this to help sell consoles as well as copies of the game, but even then, not everybody is going to buy the content, which will presumably be priced at 800 points (that's $10) - So 5 million people would have to download the content just for Microsoft to break even.
Actually they would have to sell a lot more than 5 million copies, as not only is the $10 per sale not 100% profit, but they also have to share that with RockStar.
It's been estimated that on average, MS makes less than $10 in profit for every $50 X360 game sold. At that rate, MS would have to sell over 500 million games before their Xbox division will ever turn a profit... and that's ONLY if they were to also stop all advertising, marketing, and development, which clearly they aren't going to do.

The assumption, for which I share, is that they are willing to take the loss to try and monopolize the market, then they will be able to make much greater profits in the future, much as they have done in other markets. The problem though is that I do not believe even they expected to be this much in debt this far into the game and investors have shown their displeasure in the lack of financial success from MS's Xbox division.
 
I believe the reason we're concluding this being built around the X360 is probably because TakeTwo had Rockstar working on the X360 about 2 months before hand. The PS3 development started afterwards, and being that Rockstar said everything would be equal leads us to conclude they're focused on the X360.

Think about it. X360 development starts a couple months early, Rockstar confirm equalness, PS3 development will not be pushed as said. Basically, Sony is getting a GTA IV built to the maximum levels of Microsoft's Xbox360, and not it's own.
 
Rockstar said everything would be equal leads us to conclude they're focused on the X360.
When did RockStar ever say everything would be equal, and they certainly have never said anything about being focused on the X360 edition. In fact, if it is true that they started working on the X360 edition first, but then say that the PS3 edition is catching up, then one could just as easily say they are focusng more on the PS3 edition otherwise it wouldn't necessarily be "catching up" if the primary focus was on the X360.

Think about it. X360 development starts a couple months early, Rockstar confirm equalness, PS3 development will not be pushed as said. Basically, Sony is getting a GTA IV built to the maximum levels of Microsoft's Xbox360, and not it's own.
Other than a statement from RockStar that they started development on the X360 first, everything else in your statement is untrue. One might speculate that they may become true, but currently they are not.

RockStar has not "confirmed equalness", only that they will be released at the same time.

RockStar has not said "PS3 development will not be pushed".

We don't know that "Sony is getting a GTA IV built to the maximum levels of Microsoft's Xbox360".

Do I believe there is a chance some or all of these may happen, sure, but there is also a chance they wont, thus you can't say any of those statements are known facts.


You can just as easily claim that RockStar will take advanatge of the power and capacity of the PS3 and will offer a substantially better game. Either case, its all specualtion until these issues are officially confirmed by RockStar, or for that matter, until the games actually come out and tested.
 
After all this information coming out, I think I might take my time in choosing which console I'm going to get, considering I'm almost solely buying one of the two based on GTA 4.
 
When did RockStar ever say everything would be equal, and they certainly have never said anything about being focused on the X360 edition. In fact, if it is true that they started working on the X360 edition first, but then say that the PS3 edition is catching up, then one could just as easily say they are focusng more on the PS3 edition otherwise it wouldn't necessarily be "catching up" if the primary focus was on the X360.

Do you even read the articles?

Rockstar has clearly stated no version will gain something over the other. Therefore, equal copies.

You have absolutely zero right to say anything now if you're not going to even try to do your homework.

Dan Houser
Xbox 360 vs PS3- Dan Houser of Rockstar says that the idea is to not have any hint of bias towards any of the platforms. He says there won't be any differences between the versions for each console.
Both games will run the same graphics, same missions, same story.

Being so, the PS3 version will not be used to it's full potential. The Xbox 360 was being developed on first, and foremost due to the lack of what can be achieved with it compared to Sony. Therefore, PS3 owners will be playing a game that would push the limits of the X360, and not their own.

Who are you anyways, to come here, and say everyone's reasonable conclusion is wrong, when you have zero facts yourself? You have some nerve calling me wrong on the equalness that will be done between both consoles, when Dan Houser comes out, and proves my statement true.
So, try not to make yourself look foolish with silly statements like this anymore.

RockStar has not "confirmed equalness", only that they will be released at the same time.

Unless, you don't know Dan Houser is a head of Rockstar Games.


Oh, and yes, the PS3 is being limited.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=163233
Again, Dan Houser says the X360, in certain ways, will limit what they can do to provide an equalness to both consoles.
 
Do you even read the articles?
Yes, but obviously not every single one of the millions of articles that are posted on the internet about this game. :rolleyes:


Rockstar has clearly stated no version will gain something over the other. Therefore, equal copies.
Actually they have not, explained below.


You have absolutely zero right to say anything now if you're not going to even try to do your homework.
I appologize if you feel so offended, but not only was I not aware of the third person quote from that German Magazine, but I must have missed where you credited your source so I would even be aware of it... especially when as I said, there are millions of "articles" on GTA4, and of the countless one I read, I never saw a single quote from Houser or anyone else at RockStar saying "there won't be any differences between the versions for each console", and I still haven't, as you have not providid a link to a source with a direct quote. You may be right, but it would be useful if you did.

BTW: the following is not a quote from Houser:
Dan Houser
Xbox 360 vs PS3- Dan Houser of Rockstar says that the idea is to not have any hint of bias towards any of the platforms. He says there won't be any differences between the versions for each console.
Unless he is in the habbit of talking in the third person, this is clearly not a quote from Houser.

I wondered why you didn't post a link to this quote, so I did a google news search for that exact quote and it came up with ZERO articles. Even a general search of the web came back with only TWO hits (actually its just one as the two links are to the same story from the same source - Quick Jump)... out of over 6.5 million hits for Grand Theft Auto.

In addition, the story is about an article in a German gaming magazine, specifically GamePro, but I find it odd that GamePro's main site makes no mention of this article.

Furthermore, its been a month since that German article was 'discovered', and yet I have not seen a single quote from Houser confirming the validity of the article.

So considering all this, no source for your original post, no link in your last post, only one hit from a google search using the quote you provided, and further research resulting in finding out it is an unconfirmed story from GamePro's German site from over a month ago - but searching their main site comes up empty.... can you really blame me or anyone for not being aware of this 'story', or even believeing it for that matter?

Both games will run the same graphics, same missions, same story.
Once again, please provide a link to where RockStar has made that quote.

Who are you anyways, to come here, and say everyone's reasonable conclusion is wrong, when you have zero facts yourself? You have some nerve calling me wrong on the equalness that will be done between both consoles, when Dan Houser comes out, and proves my statement true.
So, try not to make yourself look foolish with silly statements like this anymore.
First of all I didn't say "everyone's reasonable conclusion is wrong".

Second of all, unless I'm mistaken it is a fact that RockStar said both editions will be released at the same time, so knowing that fact alone already proves you are wrong about me having "zero facts" :rolleyes:

Thirdly, as discussed above, all you have provided was a third party quote from a translated German GamePro article which has not been confirmed by Houser, at least not that I found, nor have you provided a link showing any said confirmation from Houser.

Finally, while you may or may not be right, despite offering little or no sources that corroborate the information, it does get rather tiresome to constantly have to filter through all the speculation and misinformation that is disguised as unquestionable fact, especially with so little that is truly confirmed regarding this game.

So if you feel I am being too pessimistic every time someone posts claiming they know specific facts about the details of these games and then get angry because they expect me to read all 6.5 million articles about the game, much of which is also riddled with speculation and rumor, please forgive me.
 
Yes, but obviously not every single one of the millions of articles that are posted on the internet about this game. :rolleyes:
Nice exaggeration. :rolleyes: It still helps to read them so you know what you're talking about.

Actually they have not, explained below.
Sorry, yes they have. If you're going to be blind and not see that being unbiased towards either console means achieveing equalism, then why bother posting?

BTW: the following is not a quote from Houser:
Unless he is in the habbit of talking in the third person, this is clearly not a quote from Houser.
What does it matter? The fact is, he told a magazine there will be no bias towards either consoles. They're being developed equally.

I wondered why you didn't post a link to this quote, so I did a google news search for that exact quote and it came up with out of over 6.5 million hits for Grand Theft Auto.
Yes, it's GamePro, however, the fact you 6.5 million hits is not my fault for "Grand Theft Auto." Try being more specific for Google, and know 6.4 million of those views are fan discussions.

Here, I'll help you with your Google.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4HPIA_en___US204&q=GamePro+Germany
OMG, look at that. Websites reporting GamePro Germany's article so much, that it would be impossible for Houser to miss and call false claims as you're stating below.

So considering all this, no source for your original post, no link in your last post, only one hit from a google search using the quote you provided, and further research resulting in finding out it is an unconfirmed story from GamePro's German site from over a month ago - but searching their main site comes up empty.... can you really blame me or anyone for not being aware of this 'story', or even believeing it for that matter?
No, but I can blame you for not researching further more. You're calling it unconfirmed because the article no longer exists? Do you even know GamePro is one of the worst sites on the web to find info from?

BTW, you'll love this as I can tell zero research was done here.

GamePro Germany is a book magazine, and shares almost zero with GamePro.com besides having the same name and ownership. They share nothing in info.

Once again, please provide a link to where RockStar has made that quote.
Do you not understand what this means?
GTA4.net
When R*'s Dan Houser was asked about the differences between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions, he replied saying that it is their goal to have none, and that there are no platform preferences
http://www.gta4.net/news/3872/small-details-from-gamepro-germany/
They want zero differences. That means equalness. That means same missions and story. And yes, that is a legit website.

Second of all, unless I'm mistaken it is a fact that RockStar said both editions will be released at the same time, so knowing that fact alone already proves you are wrong about me having "zero facts" :rolleyes:
Well, good for you! You got the easiest friggin' fact right.

Thirdly, as discussed above, all you have provided was a third party quote from a translated German GamePro article which has not been confirmed by Houser, at least not that I found, nor have you provided a link showing any said confirmation from Houser.
Houser told GameProGermany. Why the hell would he confirm what he said?

Finally, while you may or may not be right, despite offering little or no sources that corroborate the information, it does get rather tiresome to constantly have to filter through all the speculation and misinformation that is disguised as unquestionable fact, especially with so little that is truly confirmed regarding this game.
I can't help it if you're researching for 2 minutes, and calling it a day. All you've done is obviously show you have zero idea on the details.

So if you feel I am being too pessimistic every time someone posts claiming they know specific facts about the details of these games and then get angry because they expect me to read all 6.5 million articles about the game, much of which is also riddled with speculation and rumor, please forgive me.

The fact that you think all 6.5 million hits for the term, "Grand Theft Auto" in Google means GTA IV or even an article leads me to suspect you have no idea how to use Google, or understand it.

So, what have we learned?

  • GamePro Germany is a book magazine and shares no affiliation with GamePro.com.
    Dan Houser is not going to come out and confirm to everyone what he told a magazine.
    Both systems are equal. If you can't understand "No differences between consoles", then please leave.
    And lastly, you apparently, don't know how to use Google.
 
I could continue this pointless debate with point by point explanations of how out of line and in some cases clearly worng you are, and your recent posts are a prime example of those who take one small bit of third party anecdotal, and unconfirmed statements and exaggerate it, jump to conclusions that were not made, and then turn it into some kind of unquestionable fact, when most of the time its borderline FUD.... but clearly no matter what anyone says it isn't going to make a hills bit of difference in your attitude or your behavior, as your recourse now is to just be insulting even when your own insults don't even make any sense.

If you just enjoy ranting, feel free to do it with yourself, I wont be a party to your lashing out any longer.
 
I really don't care. The fact is, you came in, and declared, pretty much, that everyone's conclusions were untrue.
Yet, here I am posting proof that Rockstar did in fact, say such things, while you to continue to make excuses.

Rockstar said they want an equalness between consoles. You come in saying, "Rockstar never said that." What, then, did I just post? Dan Houser's twin brother who interviewed a magazine?

This isn't that much a pointless debate, just a discussion where you claim everything isn't necessarily true, yet the developers say it is. Of course, your excuse is to say Dan Houser didn't confirm that he said that. Why would a developer need to tell everyone what he told a magazine is true? That's retarded.

But I'm glad you stopped. Now, I won't have to continuously post articles about what Dan Houser and his team said while you continue to think, "Dan Houser didn't confirm what he said. It's N0t tRu3!"
 
I'm not sure why Rockstar is so very supportive of the Xbox 360 lately.
Probably because there's currently 11 million Xbox 360s on the market and only about 3.5 million PS3s (if the figures I've heard are correct)?

Plus, what's this about the Xbox version having a third of the size of the PS3 version (20Gb+). Do we have a source for that 20Gb number?


KM.
 
Microsoft pays $50,000,000 for exclusive GTA IV content.

Let's do some math:

$50,000,000 divided by $20.00 (1600 points) = 2,500,000

Microsoft would need to sell 2.5 million copies of the add-on content to break even. That is about 20% of the 360 install base. How much profit does Microsoft consider successful? 10, 20, another 50 million dollars? Microsoft's Game division still has a 2006 loss of 1.26 billion dollars.
 
Probably because there's currently 11 million Xbox 360s on the market and only about 3.5 million PS3s (if the figures I've heard are correct)?

Plus, what's this about the Xbox version having a third of the size of the PS3 version (20Gb+). Do we have a source for that 20Gb number?


KM.
Speaking of sources, let me pull a D-N on D-N. And clean up the turd I dropped and left to rot.

Digital, do you have any proof from credible sources that the PS3 version is indeed 20GB+? Or proof that the PS3 version will get the episodic content on day 1 on disc? Or proof that the PS3 version will have better framerate, better textures, better lighting, better graphics in general?

Thought so. So let's use logic.

You cite console preferences in all of the above. Well, that instantly got thrown out the window with next-gen, and Rockstar is not innocent. If they gave a damn about console preferences, the 360 version would be coming a year after the PS3 version, and it sure wouldn't have episodic content. You also cite "the PS3 version catching up" for it to surpass the 360 version in quality. Well, it's a massive release and they don't want to pull an Ubisoft and have a shoddy game on the PS3.

Now, as for the episodic content being on the PS3 version's disc on Day 1... get a grip. Microsoft paid FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS for that. $50,000,000. They could've completely funded 2-3 solid A projects for that. Do you honestly, honestly believe that they would've paid $50 million dollars for content to appear 6 months to a year (respectively for both episodic projects) after the PS3 version gets it on disc, free of charge, on Day 1? Seriously.

Microsoft pays $50,000,000 for exclusive GTA IV content.

Let's do some math:

$50,000,000 divided by $20.00 (1600 points) = 2,500,000

Microsoft would need to sell 2.5 million copies of the add-on content to break even. That is about 20% of the 360 install base. How much profit does Microsoft consider successful? 10, 20, another 50 million dollars? Microsoft's Game division still has a 2006 loss of 1.26 billion dollars.

Well, I'm guessing the episodic content will be about $30, something like Shivering Isles. Considering GTA4 will be a system seller on the 360 for various reasons (lower console price, episodic content, etc), and that some of this content will be released nearly a year after GTA4's release, thus having a much larger userbase (30,000,000 if they sell 10,000,000 this year and 2008), I'd say it's certainly plausible. Even if the content was $20 a whack. Will it happen? It might, it might not.

But then again, MS should've just secured GTA4 as a 360 exclusive when shoving out that much dough. I mean... fifty million. That'd cover for most of GTA4's cost, marketing and development.
 
Duċk;2691303
But then again, MS should've just secured GTA4 as a 360 exclusive when shoving out that much dough. I mean... fifty million. That'd cover for most of GTA4's cost, marketing and development.

They could have, but I wouldn't be surprised if TakeTwo denied the offer.

Think about it, yes, you could make a lot more dough from such a deal instead of selling on both consoles, but you would be turning your back on loyal Sony & PC owners who have followed you since the beginning.

I believe TakeTwo wants to please the fans of both consoles, PC included (because that would def. piss of PC Modders who have been modifying the game from the beginning as well), and make money from all 3 instead of 1.

I mean, seriously, that wouldn't be the smartest move to become an exclusive title to Microsoft after selling thousands of copies to PC and Sony users for near a decade now.
 
They could have, but I wouldn't be surprised if TakeTwo denied the offer.

Think about it, yes, you could make a lot more dough from such a deal instead of selling on both consoles, but you would be turning your back on loyal Sony & PC owners who have followed you since the beginning.

I believe TakeTwo wants to please the fans of both consoles, PC included (because that would def. piss of PC Modders who have been modifying the game from the beginning as well), and make money from all 3 instead of 1.

I mean, seriously, that wouldn't be the smartest move to become an exclusive title to Microsoft after selling thousands of copies to PC and Sony users for near a decade now.

Yeah, I see your point.
 
Duċk;2691303
Digital, do you have any proof from credible sources that the PS3 version is indeed 20GB+? Or proof that the PS3 version will get the episodic content on day 1 on disc? Or proof that the PS3 version will have better framerate, better textures, better lighting, better graphics in general?
No, and while it is true I made a poorly worded one sentence response about fitting +20GB on a 7GB disc, no where have I ever claimed that it is an unquestionable fact that the PS3 version will get the episodic content on day 1 on disc, or will have better framerate, better textures, better lighting, better graphics in general. So I guess I’m pulling a D-N on your D-N on D-N? ;)

Oh, and no need to act glib and pull a McLaren. :rolleyes:

BTW: Thanks Duck for bring that quote about the +20GB to my attention, I edited it to make sure there was no further misunderstanding - although in previous discussions I have made it clear it is only speculation that the PS3 version will be larger than 7GB.

However, considering that GTA: San Andreas for the PS2 already filled a DVD-ROM, and was developed three years ago in standard def, and that R:FOM was 16GB, and that Kojima has stated that they already need more disc space than 22GB for MGS4, it isn’t completely unreasonable to speculate the possibility that the PS3 version of GTA4 will be larger than 7GB.



Now if you could step out of your Devil Advocate X360 Loving outfit for a moment and by contrast, perhaps also address the factual claims McLaren made:

Houser says there won't be any differences between the versions for each console.
Other than from 3rd party anecdotal comments about a very questionable translated German source and although it would be significant news, no one at RockStar, even Houser, has confirmed the story to be true or said the same statement on their website, or press release, or with any of the other interviews they have done with other gaming publications... When has RockStar ever made this statement? As an opinion, I would agree with it, and frankly, I would not be surprised this may end up being the case, but that doesn’t make it a fact.


Sony is getting a GTA IV built to the maximum levels of Microsoft's Xbox360, and not it's own.
When has RockStar ever made this statement? Again, as an opinion I would agree with it as I expect this will be the case, but it doesn’t make it a fact.


Both games will run the same graphics, same missions, same story.
When has RockStar ever made this statement? Both games might, but that doesn’t make it a fact.


PS3 version will not be used to it's full potential.
When has RockStar ever made this statement? Again, as an opinion I would agree as I fully expect the PS3 version not to as well, but that doesn’t make it a fact!


you have zero facts yourself?
As pointed out, I and those participating in this thread know that RockStar is the developer, Take-Two is the distributor, the game will use their RAGE engine, the game will take place in newly designed 'Liberty City' which is based on NYC, and that the game is currently scheduled for release on both the X360 and PS3 on October 16, 2007. There are other facts I am aware of, perhaps none more so than the fact that until the game is released, no one can say for sure exactly how the two editions will compare... but the point is that clearly it is not a fact that I have zero facts. :rolleyes:


Oh, and yes, the PS3 is being limited.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=163233
Again, Dan Houser says the X360, in certain ways, will limit what they can do to provide an equalness to both consoles.
Even the link that McLaren provides makes no mention what so ever to Houser saying specifically that the PS3 is being limited or anything about providing “equalness” (never heard that term before) to both consoles. So not only is this not a fact, but even his own link in that quote doesn't back it up.

In fact, you could jump to all sorts of different conclusions based on those statements, but certainly no actual facts other than the fact that Houser admits that because unlike with the PS3, there's no guarantee of a hard-drive and you're working with the standard DVD format it creates limitations... but he makes no mention of it creating a limitation for the PS3.

It is also a fact that as reported in the official UK PlayStation magazine (where RockStar has released much of the information and details about its game developments... not that German magazine), Houser said "both have enormous challenges" and that "both have their own particular pleasures and pains", but once again, he has not said that both will get the exact same version of the game. People can come to their own personal conclusions, but that doesn't make them facts!


The fact is, you came in, and declared, pretty much, that everyone's conclusions were untrue.
Over fifty people have posted in this thread and nearly 500 posts, many sharing various conclusions, please share with me the posts where I "declared, pretty much, that everyone's conclusions were untrue." McLaren must think very highly of himself to equate my having a problem with several, not even all, only several of his own statements when presented as facts and not just an opinion to even suggest that means I have declared everyone's conclusions as being untrue. :rolleyes:

Besides, as opinions, I actually would agree with most of what McLaren is saying - my disagreement is that he is portraying much much of these opinions as facts.

In fact, once Viper clarified that those were only his own personal conclusions and not facts, I had no disagreement with him at all.


Why would a developer need to tell everyone what he told a magazine is true? That's retarded.
Well let's start with the obvious. It was a translated German magazine article without direct quotes made over a month ago. Considering Houser isn't German, RockStar is not a German company, it would certainly not be the first time an article has been fabricated, the statements if true are incredibly significant and yet surprisingly after a whole month not a single word from RockStar to confirm that Houser in fact did make those statements.

While I wont go down to McLarens level and call anything retarded, I would say that it is an expected and common practice for those participating in interviews where they announce significant details about their products that have never been mentioned before or since to confirm the accuracy of those reporting it... especially considering the singular source from another country.

I'm not making any claims to the accuracy of the article, only that there is a long history of articles that do in fcat publish false information, and to believe otherwise is well... no need to say it, you know already.


Now, I won't have to continuously post articles about what Dan Houser and his team said while you continue to think, "Dan Houser didn't confirm what he said. It's N0t tRu3!"
Except McLaren is only posting references to the same questionable article from a foreign country, as he admits already that there are no other articles where Houser has shared the same information, thus corroborating what the German source claimed – those links all refer to the same German article. :rolleyes:


Listen, no where have I ever said, nor will I say that the article isn't genuine, because to say that would also mean I would have to know that as a fact. I don’t. Just as we also do not know for a fact that the article is accurate. Considering all the circumstances, for me it seems extremely suspicious considering the source, the length of time since it came out, and not a single corroborative statement from RockStar to back the story up. The fact that RockStar has yet to publish any press release that says the editions will be equal makes this story all the more less believable.

It may well turn out to be true, or more to the point, both editions may end up being identical, and that German magazine can enjoy claiming to be the ones that first broke the "story".

However, they might not, and as I said earlier, until these games come out, all we can do is speculate and share our own personal opinion. However it is most certainly wrong to make blanket statements of fact as if we know for sure one way or another, because we most certainly do not.




These are all unfortunate examples of how bloody frustrating and even futile it is to try and filter out actual informative facts about this and other topics when certain individuals continually exaggerate and disguise personal opinion as facts. 👎
 
I like it when arguments aren’t getting anywhere. Is it possible to just leave it alone until we have more information? Please, before one of you burst an aneurysm. :p
 
I like it when arguments aren’t getting anywhere. Is it possible to just leave it alone until we have more information? Please, before one of you burst an aneurysm. :p
Great advice. 👍
 
No, and other than my poorly worded one sentence response about fitting +20GB on a 7GB disc no where have I ever claimed that it is an unquestionable fact that the PS3 version will get the episodic content on day 1 on disc, or will have better framerate, better textures, better lighting, better graphics in general. So I guess I’m pulling a D-N on your D-N on D-N? ;)

Oh, and no need to act glib and pull a McLaren. :rolleyes:
My god, you're so funny. You talk about not insulting others, yet I see that as insult.

Hypocrit much, are we?

When has RockStar ever made this statement? Again, as an opinion I would agree as I fully expect the PS3 version not to as well, but that doesn’t make it a fact!
Rockstar doesn't have to make a statement to see this could very well be the case. If Rockstar wants to aim to keep both consoles equal to each other, then that means the X360 is going to hold back what PS3 can do with it. If the PS3 is let loose, the goal is not achieved as nothing will be equal.

Even the link that McLaren provides makes no mention what so ever to Houser saying specifically that the PS3 is being limited or anything about providing “equalness” (never heard that term before) to both consoles. So not only is this not a fact, but even his own link in that quote doesn't back it up.
Illiterate, as well.

"When R*'s Dan Houser was asked about the differences between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions, he replied saying that it is their goal to have none, and that there are no platform preferences."

You're obviously having a hard time reading, so I'll make it simple. Dan Houser, himself, reported they want no differences, therefore wanting to make the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions equal to each other.

It is also a fact that as reported in the official UK PlayStation magazine (where RockStar has released much of the information and details about its game developments... not that German magazine), Houser said "both have enormous challenges" and that "both have their own particular pleasures and pains", but once again, he has not said that both will get the exact same version of the game. People can come to their own personal conclusions, but that doesn't make them facts!
Ok, so because it's German, it doesn't count? What are you? Intolerable, or something? Plenty of international gaming magazines have reported what Dan Houser has told them. Just because Dan Houser may not speak German, does not mean he can talk to a German, and English speaking reporter. The amount of info he shares with 1 or the other does not matter either.

How many sorry excuses are you going to make?

Over fifty people have posted in this thread and nearly 500 posts, many sharing various conclusions, please share with me the posts where I "declared, pretty much, that everyone's conclusions were untrue." McLaren must think very highly of himself to equate my having a problem with several, not even all, only several of his own statements when presented as facts and not just an opinion to even suggest that means I have declared everyone's conclusions as being untrue. :rolleyes:
Again, you include everything to 1 situation just like you projected all 6.5 million hits on the words "Grand Theft Auto" must relate to Grand Theft Auto IV. Yes, Vip said those were his opinions, but you came, and pretty much, declared that couldn't possibly be right in any form. You act like you know more about this game than anyone here.

Besides, as opinions, I actually would agree with most of what McLaren is saying - my disagreement is that he is portraying much much of these opinions as facts.
Unforunately for you, I have Dan Houser's statement as fact enough. He does not need to confirm what he said, there's no reason too, and no developer ever does that. Show me 1 developer who came out and said what he told a magazine was true? That will most likely, never happen. If you actually pay attention, you'll see when a developer comes out to discuss what a magazine has claimed he said, it will most likely be that he did not say that, and that the magazine is lieing.

That's much like a Prime Minister saying, "I will enforce better laws for my people" to a magazine, and then coming out to his followers and saying, "Yes, I said that." Why would he do that? He said it once. He doesn't need to confirm it again.

Well let's start with the obvious. It was a translated German magazine article without direct quotes made over a month ago. Considering Houser isn't German, RockStar is not a German company, it would certainly not be the first time an article has been fabricated, the statements if true are incredibly significant and yet surprisingly after a whole month not a single word from RockStar to confirm that Houser in fact did make those statements.
By those terms, I can not confirm what Playstation UK said is true. Dan Houser is not English, and RockStar is not an English company, therefore, Dan Houser or Rockstar must come out and confirm what they told a magazine in another country different from their own what they said is true.

While I wont go down to McLarens level and call anything retarded, I would say that it is an expected and common practice for those participating in interviews where they announce significant details about their products that have never been mentioned before or since to confirm the accuracy of those reporting it... especially considering the singular source from another country.

I'm not making any claims to the accuracy of the article, only that there is a long history of articles that do in fcat publish false information, and to believe otherwise is well... no need to say it, you know already.
What you don't know is that that is not the full article of GTA IV from GamePro Germany. Like every GTA IV article in any magazine, it has been large and long since the trailer was released.

Except McLaren is only posting references to the same questionable article from a foreign country, as he admits already that there are no other articles where Houser has shared the same information, thus corroborating what the German source claimed – those links all refer to the same German article. :rolleyes:
Where have I admitted Dan Houser shared no other information? The UK is a foreign country to Rockstar and Dan Houser, therefore, I can deem the UK articles questionable unless Dan Houser has said the samething in US magazines. But oh, he hasn't as the UK Magazine reports things most magazines here have not.

Every GTA IV trusted fan site, many including sites that get information from Rockstar, have taken what Houser said in that article, and reported it. If Rockstar wanted to come out and not confirm it, they would have done so by now. But they haven't, and you have no real reason to think what Dan Houser said isn't true. If it wasn't, Houser would have come out and told folks it wasn't.

Listen, no where have I ever said, nor will I say that the article isn't genuine, because to say that would also mean I would have to know that as a fact. I don’t. Just as we also do not know for a fact that the article is accurate.
Then why doubt it all just because it's not well known? Do you not know that perhaps, there's more to the story than what the website is telling you since it is a book-type Magazine and not an online one?

The fact that RockStar has yet to publish any press release that says the editions will be equal makes this story all the more less believable.
Rockstar obviously doesn't need to. The story is true. If it wasn't, Rockstar would have easily come out, and replied, "What the magazine reported is not true. We are not saying both consoles are aiming for equality." They've seen this info enough over 300 different websites for a month to make the decision they want to leave it as is (meaning, Dan Houser most likely said it), or come out and claim it is not true.

It may well turn out to be true, or more to the point, both editions may end up being identical, and that German magazine can enjoy claiming to be the ones that first broke the "story".
They're really not. Houser has hinted at this tons of times with his interviews with many independent magazines. Many folks who follow Rockstar sharing info nobody else has gotten easily agree with this.

Besides, the main point is, if the story was untrue, Dan Houser would have come and said it after a month. He hasn't, therefore, we can easily presume he did infact say those words.
 
GTP's AUP
You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.

As clearly you only intend to escalate this situation all the while ignoring many critical facts and despite what the AUP says, continue to post knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate material, I'll send you the response you so richly deserve in a PM so as not to drag this thread through any more mud than it already has.
 
As clearly you only intend to escalate this situation all the while ignoring many critical facts and despite what the AUP says, continue to post knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate material, I'll send you the response you so richly deserve in a PM so as not to drag this thread through any more mud than it already has.

Sorry, but I've broken nothing as you can not prove, only spectulate, that the article is false.

As for your PM, don't bother. I don't feel like reading trash right now that you think I "so richly deserve." Way to up your attitude.

EDIT*
P.S. You owe me a big apology.

Hamish Brown
And there are no load times, period, according to Brown. "You can basically play the game from beginning to end without a single load screen," he explains. And it won't be affected by your choice of console between Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, either: "They will both be the same," says Brown."
Interview with Kikizo, Page 3.
http://games.kikizo.com/news/200705/101_p1.asp

That's 2 people who said both will be the same. Therefore, your opinion of them quite possibly being different, is thrown out the window.
 
Okay, I'm getting very tired of this crap. Really. It's been more than obvious for a long time now than none of you are going to change your opinions, and I'm getting really tired of people like this on GTP.

You have an opinion, he has an opinion, three hundred other people have an opinion, but apparantly everyone's wrong. Until Dan Houser actually comes to Digital-Nitrate's door, sits down with him for three hours providing photo-identification and telling him three times over about anything, even if it is damn obvious, then this is going to continue for far too many pages than I'm willing to put up with.

So let's just let it go.
 
Well, here's something most of us should enjoy as fact.

New York, NY - June 18, 2007 - Rockstar Games is proud to announce that Grand Theft Auto IV is currently on schedule and will most certainly be available on October 16 in North America and October 19 in Europe, for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 consoles. "It is a difficult task at hand reaching our deadline, but not as hard as choosing bedroom wallpapers for my new SoHo Estate, so I'm confident that we will reach our initial release date," commented Dan Houser, Vice President at Rockstar Games.
 
Wallpapers. :yuck:

Also, for any other Australians around, the release date is set for the 19th of October, the same date as Europe, and the price (which I've been searching around for a while to find out) will be around $102, it seems.

I was expecting a little more expensive, and maybe that price is just a website-based thing, but I'm hoping that it comes around that price.
 
Until Dan Houser actually comes to Digital-Nitrate's door, sits down with him for three hours providing photo-identification and telling him three times over about anything, even if it is damn obvious
Now where did I ever even suggest that was necessary? Come on, its this kind of exaggeration and twisting of the facts that is so disturbing in the first place.

Not only is it about the validity of the source that should be in question considering the complete lack of any kind of collaborative evidence, no more so than the fact that the only source is from a translation from a month old foreign magazine article. I even went so far as to say that it could very well be true so why you would even consider suggesting that I would need Dan Houser to come to my door, sit down with me for three hours providing photo-identification and telling me three times over about anything is completely and utterly ridiculous. It’s almost as if either of you have never even heard of a press release before. RockStar as well as most companies developing games provide them all the time sharing specific details about their games.

However, it is also the other statements that were made by McLaren that were clearly false, misleading and inaccurate, much of it attributed directly to me ... as well as insulting, but apparently that's OK now on GTP seeing as you have made it a point to largely ignore McLaren’s role and emphasis my role by exaggerating the concerns I have as to the validity of a source and the way he twisted what was said to create false facts.... and ignored the fact that I even agreed that as an opinion, not as a fact, I actually agree with much of it. *sigh*

(and yes I returned a couple insulting remarks in kind, and for that I apologize, but frankly I suspect McLaren knew he was pushing my buttons, expecting and getting a reaction)


So let's just let it go.
I did once, and I'll attempt to again, but I must say this has left a very sour taste in my mouth.
 
Interview with Kikizo, Page 3.
http://games.kikizo.com/news/200705/101_p1.asp

That's 2 people who said both will be the same. Therefore, your opinion of them quite possibly being different, is thrown out the window.
I have not read the rest of the article, but the Hamish Brown quote that you provided just says that there will be NO LOAD TIMES on either platform, not that the games will be identical in all ways. That sentence alone is hardly basis for a jihad.
 
I've read a lot replies in this thread and have now decided not to throw in my own comments. I am afraid of the Sony fanboys in this thread telling me my facts and opinions are bad. The PS3 will make GTA:IV lookz amazzing compared to that crappy Sexbox version.

Although nobody has gone to that extent praising the PS3, it's still very clear to see who you are.
 
I have not read the rest of the article, but the Hamish Brown quote that you provided just says that there will be NO LOAD TIMES on either platform, not that the games will be identical in all ways. That sentence alone is hardly basis for a jihad.

Maybe so, but it still stands as evidence that Rockstar is content on making everything the same despite, again, the PS3 being the more capable of the 2.
 
Geeze, im just going to wait until it comes out and then make my decision on that. I haven't played it so i have no idea what is going to be what until i have MY hands on it.
 
DN
However, it is also the other statements that were made by McLaren that were clearly false, misleading and inaccurate, much of it attributed directly to me ... as well as insulting, but apparently that's OK now on GTP seeing as you have made it a point to largely ignore McLaren’s role and emphasis my role by exaggerating the concerns I have as to the validity of a source and the way he twisted what was said to create false facts.... and ignored the fact that I even agreed that as an opinion, not as a fact, I actually agree with much of it. *sigh*
I'm not trying to take either side on this argument. I threw in an example of why this is just damn frustrating and annoying to listen to, which happened to involve you instead of McLaren, but you're both just as bad as each other.

Let's just move on.

Just some quick Rockstar news, non-GTA 4 related, but interesting nonetheless. "Manhunt 2 has been banned by the BBFC and will not be sold in the United Kingdom."

Hopefully this doesn't further taint their view of Rockstar Games and harm the release of GTA 4, though I'm fairly confident it won't.
 
Back