Okay. I don't know why you think that a company which could give everyone the same experience choosing not to do so and holding cosmetics and features off from players is okay just because the game cost a lot of money (which it already covered off three times over with literal money-for-nothing last time out, and you assert will be covered by an order of magnitude this time out), took a lot of effort (from people who won't see quite so much of the rewards*) and might be good...
... and perhaps let's wait for the reviews before declaring it "seminal"... GTASA was stale dog turds, and nothing conjures up memories of GTA4 quite like irritating phone calls about going bowling.
Sure they do. Some, of course, don't, but people even in our own FH6 forums have objected to the whole thing.
Separately, and of note, there's no Early Access period for GTAVI, as is now pretty common as a pre-order/higher-tier edition bonus across the industry.
Sure thing. It's taken 13 years after all. Why does this make the practice of chopping out a bunch of cosmetics from the game to sell back to people for $20 just fine?
I get that you're willing to accept it, but that's an entirely different consideration. Well, for the most part: people being willing to accept it is why it still happens.
Again, it's also chronic lack of self-awareness from a company and a game series that makes fun of the excesses of capitalism.
*If they still have jobs, and are alive after the crunch (which Rockstar now claims is better than it was for Bully/RDR2)