GTP Cool Wall: 1966 Renault R8 Gordini 1300

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jahgee
  • 125 comments
  • 9,720 views

1966 Renault R8 Gordini 1300


  • Total voters
    135
  • Poll closed .
I know, and I respect their opinions. This isn't their cup of tea.

True, but its a bit disappointing to see some genuinely good little cars being drug down because it doesn't have a "'Murican Vee Ate Moter."
 
Ugly little thing.
 
Part of it's ugliness is the lack of a visible grille. It's ugly for the same reason Voldemort is ugly; part of it's face isn't there.
 
Also am I the only one who thinks this car isn't that ugly?
I did at first, but have grown to love it's constantly pissed off look
 
If it weren't so ugly, SZ. It gets a cool though, because historic.
 
Sub-zero. Classic, French car with a rally history.
 
True, but its a bit disappointing to see some genuinely good little cars being drug down because it doesn't have a "'Murican Vee Ate Moter."
I don't think that's the reason they're voting uncool. It's just because this isn't their type of car.
 
These things are hilarious fun to drive. I more or less recently shot one of six original Gordinis in Mexico (the entire country, there are several replicas, tough) and even with modern, wider radials it was alarmingly easy to wiggle the tail out. The owner told me that he changed the stock, pencil-thin tires for those because it had already gotten him in trouble with some cops because he got the tail out just taking a street corner at normal speed! It's very very very revvy, and the guy has had it up to 180 km/h and change in the freeway. He also daily-drives it, his other "daily" is a Clio V6, one of about ten in the country.

Having a first-hand experience with one of these, the real deal none the less, really made me like these even more, even if I would have voted sub-zero if I hadn't. Heck I would vote the normal R8 sub-zero. Gordini? I cannot put it in words.

The car in question:
IMG_9405small.jpg
 
There are beautiful cars, and then there's the Renault 8 Gordini.

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuub zero.
 
Bear in mind it's a small lightweight car, it doesn't need loads of power to be quick.

Needs a bit more than that. 200 hp and I'd be satisfied. Any less simply isn't enough; doesn't matter what kind of car it is. Luckily the lack of power doesn't ruin this car's coolness, but if it were front engined it would.

So it's 80bhp per litre is 'dismal'? Compared to, say, the 65bhp per litre in the Hi-po 289 that Shelby put in the contemporary GT350?

The GT350 would blitz this thing around ANY track. Even a dirt track. HP per liter doesn't mean 🤬 if it's still slower. It really doesn't. HP per liter has absolutely nothing to do with performance, stop acting like it does. I said the horsepower is dismal, NOT the horsepower per liter. Which doesn't matter.

So the engine has to be a V8 2000lb iron block that gives 1/2hp per liter.

strawman-motivational.jpg


Never gets old.
 
The name of this car keeps me from voting it as SU. It gets a solid uncool from me.
 
The GT350 would blitz this thing around ANY track. Even a dirt track. HP per liter doesn't mean 🤬 if it's still slower. It really doesn't. HP per liter has absolutely nothing to do with performance, stop acting like it does. I said the horsepower is dismal, NOT the horsepower per liter. Which doesn't matter.
This car won 3 consecutive rally titles back in the 60's, much like the even slower Mini Cooper was dominating the Monte Carlo Rally.


Perhaps the OP should include a Background about each car so we can avoid these stupid debates involving the same 5 people who demonstrate absolutely no knowledge about these "uncool little horsepower" cars.
 
Perhaps the OP should include a Background about each car so we can avoid these stupid debates involving the same 5 people who demonstrate absolutely no knowledge about these "uncool little horsepower" cars.

I don't think it would change a thing.
 
Subzero, one legendary rally car I knew thanks to a game called V-Rally 2. Only to discover, this little bugger HARDLY appeared in much games (thankfully did in GT6!)

And I always thought, what was really wrong with it? I loved this little thing! It was a little slow in term on horse power, yeah. But still pretty fast.

Not to mention, rear wheel drive, and manual transmission? You going to just vote low because of the visual of the car? Sure, go for it but I always say this.

NEVER.JUDGE.A.BOOK.FROM.IT'S.COVER. Enough said.
 
You know what? I'm 🤬 done with the muscle car guy bashing on all these threads. 👎 It's always the same people bashing the same guys. How about you LEAVE THEM ALONE FOR ONCE!!!!
 
A very painful uncool.
 
You know what? I'm 🤬 done with the muscle car guy bashing on all these threads. 👎 It's always the same people bashing the same guys. How about you LEAVE THEM ALONE FOR ONCE!!!!
This. I just don't understand how reverse bashing using even more uneducated biases or assumptions is constructive or intelligent. Getting so old.
 
If you showed up to a random car show with one you would likely get asked a thousand times what makes it so special. This reaction would not be because they don't think it's special, but because they know it's special, they just don't know why.

Sub-Zero.
 
The GT350 would blitz this thing around ANY track. Even a dirt track. HP per liter doesn't mean 🤬 if it's still slower. It really doesn't. HP per liter has absolutely nothing to do with performance, stop acting like it does. I said the horsepower is dismal, NOT the horsepower per liter. Which doesn't matter.

The GT350 wouldn't necessarily 'blitz' the Gorgini around any track. Especially a twisty track and especially if the weather is in any way inclement.
 
This car won 3 consecutive rally titles back in the 60's, much like the even slower Mini Cooper was dominating the Monte Carlo Rally.
And even though it was slower than the Renault, the Mini was beating the American muscle cars in the touring car championship.
 
Back