- 783
- United States
- Tunerguy21
I know, and I respect their opinions. This isn't their cup of tea.
True, but its a bit disappointing to see some genuinely good little cars being drug down because it doesn't have a "'Murican Vee Ate Moter."
I know, and I respect their opinions. This isn't their cup of tea.
I did at first, but have grown to love it's constantly pissed off lookAlso am I the only one who thinks this car isn't that ugly?
Bear in mind it's a small lightweight car, it doesn't need loads of power to be quick.No, that's well-engineered. It's still very much dismal.
I love the looks, fantastic French quirkAlso am I the only one who thinks this car isn't that ugly?
So it's 80bhp per litre is 'dismal'? Compared to, say, the 65bhp per litre in the Hi-po 289 that Shelby put in the contemporary GT350?No, that's well-engineered. It's still very much dismal.
I don't think that's the reason they're voting uncool. It's just because this isn't their type of car.True, but its a bit disappointing to see some genuinely good little cars being drug down because it doesn't have a "'Murican Vee Ate Moter."
No, that's well-engineered. It's still very much dismal.
Bear in mind it's a small lightweight car, it doesn't need loads of power to be quick.
So it's 80bhp per litre is 'dismal'? Compared to, say, the 65bhp per litre in the Hi-po 289 that Shelby put in the contemporary GT350?
So the engine has to be a V8 2000lb iron block that gives 1/2hp per liter.
Needs a bit more than that. 200 hp and I'd be satisfied. Any less simply isn't enough; doesn't matter what kind of car it is.
This car won 3 consecutive rally titles back in the 60's, much like the even slower Mini Cooper was dominating the Monte Carlo Rally.The GT350 would blitz this thing around ANY track. Even a dirt track. HP per liter doesn't mean 🤬 if it's still slower. It really doesn't. HP per liter has absolutely nothing to do with performance, stop acting like it does. I said the horsepower is dismal, NOT the horsepower per liter. Which doesn't matter.
Perhaps the OP should include a Background about each car so we can avoid these stupid debates involving the same 5 people who demonstrate absolutely no knowledge about these "uncool little horsepower" cars.
This. I just don't understand how reverse bashing using even more uneducated biases or assumptions is constructive or intelligent. Getting so old.You know what? I'm 🤬 done with the muscle car guy bashing on all these threads. 👎 It's always the same people bashing the same guys. How about you LEAVE THEM ALONE FOR ONCE!!!!
The GT350 would blitz this thing around ANY track. Even a dirt track. HP per liter doesn't mean 🤬 if it's still slower. It really doesn't. HP per liter has absolutely nothing to do with performance, stop acting like it does. I said the horsepower is dismal, NOT the horsepower per liter. Which doesn't matter.
And even though it was slower than the Renault, the Mini was beating the American muscle cars in the touring car championship.This car won 3 consecutive rally titles back in the 60's, much like the even slower Mini Cooper was dominating the Monte Carlo Rally.
And even though it was slower than the Renault, the Mini was beating the American muscle cars in the touring car championship.