GTP Cool Wall: 1969-1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302

  • Thread starter Jahgee
  • 84 comments
  • 9,116 views

1969-1970 Ford Mustang Boss 302

  • Total voters
    115
  • Poll closed .
Noob616
It would only be cool with an LS swap IMO.
Click to expand...
lolwat

The motor that was in this was pretty much one of the best combinations you could get until the LS came out. It's still uber popular
 
Slash
lolwat

The motor that was in this was pretty much one of the best combinations you could get until the LS came out. It's still uber popular
Click to expand...
Yeah I know I just think it's cooler in 2014 if you swap it for an LS. Better fuel economy too.
 
Noob616
Yeah I know I just think it's cooler in 2014 if you swap it for an LS. Better fuel economy too.
Click to expand...
One does not simple swap a Boss motor :lol:

If it was a typical 302/5.0, I'm all for it, but it's not a "normal" 5.0. Maybe even if it was a clone Boss that would be fine. But an original? hell naw.
 
Slash
One does not simple swap a Boss motor :lol:

If it was a typical 302/5.0, I'm all for it, but it's not a "normal" 5.0. Maybe even if it was a clone Boss that would be fine. But an original? hell naw.
Click to expand...
Meh I just think any time you can swap a motor out for better performance it only makes the car cooler. It's unique, and the LS would give you better fuel economy, and you'd get fuel injection and VVT. That and the engines from back in the 60's were just so bad for emissions, you could swap in a modern LS and have much cleaner emissions.

Famine
Needs more RB26DETT...
Click to expand...
I think this would be cool too, for pretty much the same reasoning as above.
 
Liquid
Five polls max:

Ford Mustang (1964-1973)
Ford Mustang (1974-1978)
Ford Mustang (1979-1993)
Ford Mustang (1994-2004)
Ford Mustang (2005-)

Done. Factor in different trims as a whole. Balls to your facelifts.
Click to expand...

Adjust it to 94-98 and 99-04 and you would be golden.
 
Noob616
Meh I just think any time you can swap a motor out for better performance it only makes the car cooler. It's unique, and the LS would give you better fuel economy, and you'd get fuel injection and VVT. That and the engines from back in the 60's were just so bad for emissions, you could swap in a modern LS and have much cleaner emissions.
Click to expand...

Emissions means nothing to me :lol:
 
Noob616
That's exactly what I'm getting at, there's nothing cool about just polluting for polluting's sake. It's about performance.
Click to expand...
The Boss motors are well known to be extreme performers, especially this one. This engine is quite unique in that aspect. Why you'd want to ruin this car doing that is beyond me, but everyone entitled to their own opinion 👍

But why don't we just LS swap every classic while we're at it because everythings needlessly polluting... :/
 
Last edited:
peobryant
Nah, you're all wrong. It needs more Cummins Turbo Diesel.



Because then you can call your car "Cumstang."
Click to expand...

Damn it, that makes the 4G63 powered Mustang I was going to link seem lame by comparison! :lol: Oh well, I'll add it anyway.
As for the car that is being voted on, I'm still unsure of how to vote. I think that I might just abstain from this one.
 
The coolest Mustang in my book. High revving V8, similar to a Trans Am racer. SZ.

Mach 1 and the other early Mustangs that were polled were just standard cool to me. I think this model is different enough to be polled separately.
 
AnthonyD1993
Damn it, that makes the 4G63 powered Mustang I was going to link seem lame by comparison! :lol: Oh well, I'll add it anyway.
As for the car that is being voted on, I'm still unsure of how to vote. I think that I might just abstain from this one.
Click to expand...




I Might say this thing is awesome

and that does mean You dont always need V8s to win drag races and have fun

@Slash
 

Latest Posts

Back