I'm guessing he understood that. The point here is that Mustang was judging the car uncool based on criteria that are utterly irrelevant to it.@Zenith when he says if it has balls he means a decent amount of power.
Oh I get that, I was more so just clarifying because it seemed like he missed it.I'm guessing he understood that. The point here is that Mustang was judging the car uncool based on criteria that are utterly irrelevant to it.
Saying the Mazda doesn't have balls is like saying those 1/2 and 3/4 ton trucks are useless at negotiating Japan's side roads. It's both obvious and irrelevant - like the aforementioned "truck on the 'Ring" example. Or alternatively, judging a supercar on its wading or rock-crawling abilities. And then deeming it uncool because of it...
@Slash, I think you'll find that those in the market for a Ford Econoline aren't in the market for a Mazda Porter, and vice versa.
Its top speed is 56mph. It's not made for cruising at 55mph on some backroads.
That's like saying a Honda 250R trike is "terrible" because it's no good for carrying a 600lbs. load of cargo around narrow Japanese streets.
It also reminds me of something god would drive today.
Fixed.
No, there's several reasons besides that.What makes this cool? Too many cars here get voted cool because they are old
Depends on your definition of cool.No car with a 56 mph top speed is cool. Period.
I have to agree with this.I don't care if it can go down streets in Japan, that doesn't make it cool. Almost anywhere in the U.S. you would be laughed at for driving one of these, as well as honked at because you are in the way. The same goes for any place that has a highway. And no, nobody (as in over 90% of the developed world) has heard of this car.
What makes this cool? Too many cars here get voted cool because they are old; I don't see any other valid reason to vote this cool. No car with a 56 mph top speed is cool. Period.
What makes this cool? Too many cars here get voted cool because they are old;
I question why voting it Uncool because "'Merica" is any more valid to be honest.
It's a cool car, just look at it.
Just because it's small doesn't mean it can't do a job.microscopic engine
That "microscopic" engine works well around Japan, where it was built for. Not for the US. Drivability in the US doesn't really count towards rating because this car was never sold in America anyway.Yep, it's ugly. Look under the hood and you'll find a microscopic engine. What's your point?
I could be wrong, but I think he's talking about this.Yeah... I didn't say that anywhere in the post. Did you even read it???
Almost anywhere in the U.S. you would be laughed at for driving one of these.
And it weighs how much?Look under the hood and you'll find a microscopic engine.
That "microscopic" engine works well around Japan, where it was built for. Not for the US. Drivability in the US doesn't really count towards rating because this car was never sold in America anyway.
What? I never said that drivability was the only factor that counted.That would mean anybody here who isn't Japanese should not be qualified to have an opinion on the car.
Why do you care what other people think? You form your opinion, not them.As I see it, coolness is based on three factors: if I look good driving it, if my friends look good driving it, and my friends' reaction to seeing me drive it. This car fails all three factors.
Why do you care what other people think? You form your opinion, not them.
But that's what you think. Others may think it's wrong but you don't.Because that's what coolness is all about- what everyone else thinks. It doesn't matter what you think- if you think your Prius is cool, you are wrong.