GTP Cool Wall: 1997-2000 Mitsubishi FTO GP Version R

  • Thread starter Thread starter GranTurismo916
  • 58 comments
  • 7,878 views

1997-2000 Mitsubishi FTO GP Version R


  • Total voters
    141
  • Poll closed .
I quite liked the one I test drove, and that wasn't even the full-on GPX or GPvR. Engine sounded great, steering was responsive, seemed to corner fairly flat. Not driven one for years now so I might return to them and discover they're appalling, but it seemed okay to me.
I think a quick exchange with @Venari is in order...
 
The wide arches and sharp lines make the wheels look too small, in turn making the whole thing look like a Horseshoe Crab.

Pretty, but not that pretty. The R looks too aggressive for what it is.

Meh.
 
I agree with basically everything said, cool and uncool. I refuse to ever use meh, so I think I'll go with Cool. As it would be really cool to see one, doesn't matter the trim, some day here in the U.S.
 
Tacky styling, Lancer underpinnings/suspension (or so I've been told). Seriously uncool.

Also, I might add, very common around these parts.
 
I've seen one up close and personal. It does look pretty neat.

Cool for me.
 
My FTO is scrapped. Superb vehicle. My (slightly tuned) GPX blew the doors off the contemporary ITR - in comparison the Honda was an undertyred, understeery, overloud and extremely cheap feeling tool, albeit fairly well screwed together. Decatted with exhaust and filter, it sounded glorious - best V6 this side of a tuned NSX. Alfas sound good but from 5,500rpm up to 8k, it sounded phenomenal. @Famine @homeforsummer

Edit: Having read the thread, while I've never experienced a GPvR, my GPX was effectively that spec, but in 1994 guise with the simpler front bumper and less ricey wing. It was lowered on Tein S-Lines and Koni adjustables and on Yokos or Toyos in the dry it was impossible to make understeer unless you had an utter deathwish. There is a complex of bends on a particular road near Gaydon, and my FTO would traverse them with far more confidence than any Aston I drove down that road, with the notable exception of the V12 Vantage. Stock Vantage on Sportpack suspension with P-Zeros was close, but it had to control nearly half a tonne of extra mass. The FTO felt much more like a track car. I drove it for 150,000 miles and do miss it. IMO there is no FWD car that's as capable and fun and yet docile and usable when you want it to be. The only FWD car with better turn in I've driven was a track prepped Ford Ka with chassis mods and a 1600 Zetec on ITBs, and it was twitchy at speed.

It wasn't a Lancer based car - it was Galant, mostly, albeit quite a bit lighter. The rear suspension was sorta mix and match, with some Lancer parts from the EVO I/II era - I remember figuring out how fit the car with Lancer EVO II rear uprights (and thus driveshaft capability) as I did have the notion of hooking a Lexus V8 up to an Audi 01E transmission and putting it in the back of an FTO. We got the powertrain done, but never cut the car up due to a berk of a project partner. :D



Here it is (rather dirty) on a Team GTM holiday to the Isle of Man.
 
Last edited:
Not a bad little sports car, but compared to a second-gen Eclipse, it looks kind of boring. The Eclipse has better styling in my opinion, and has better performance.

Solid meh.
 
Great car. I remember seeing one (grey import) on a day trip to London, (Gran Turismo wasn't even in existence, at the time). I thought to myself "what the heck is that cool car?", and joked with a friend about the badge on the rear, calling it the Mitsubishi UFO.

High Cool bordering on low Sub Z.
 
Always liked the quirky styling, I don't like how most of them here are riced and fart cannon added, but I like to take cars in isolation. The FF drivetrain always raised some question marks but it still manages a Cool from me.
 
Styling is all over the place that dated very quickly. Drove brilliantly in GT3 if I remember correctly. Still Uncool though.
 
This car is deserving to become an SZ car! It's brilliant in every way, looks great, drives great, and has the usability of a normal car. I would get one for my first car (I found one for $794), if they weren't illegal in the US...
 
The GP version R is strictly a JDM Spec model, just so everyone knows.

Its a good car and has a unique V6 engine, problem is it looks ugly as sin and an Integra Type R will destroy it with it's 100kg lighter weight.
Not to mention most FTO's in australia are ruined by p platers.
 
Uncool. I'm sure the car itself is pretty good but most of the ones I've seen have been driven by people who have snapped them up cheap and ruined them, so they have a bad image in my head.
 
Its a good car and has a unique V6 engine, problem is it looks ugly as sin and an Integra Type R will destroy it with it's 100kg lighter weight.
Are you sure? Like... really sure? Only someone who has driven both (and more Aston Martins than James Bond) disagrees:
My (slightly tuned) GPX blew the doors off the contemporary ITR - in comparison the Honda was an undertyred, understeery, overloud and extremely cheap feeling tool, albeit fairly well screwed together.
 
Are you sure? Like... really sure? Only someone who has driven both (and more Aston Martins than James Bond) disagrees:
As someone who has seen them race each other I disagree.

the ITR has next to no Torque so it's sensation of power is significantly less, but it's lighter weight can't be ignored, unless your talking about a race track in which you are probably right on that.

There is even a Source for this(FTO even got a better start):
 
Last edited:
As someone who has seen them race each other I disagree.

Hey, that's OK, you're entitled.

As mentioned up there, I drove a brand new '98/'99 UK spec Acura-style nose ITR on a test-drive to replace my own FTO (lowered/mild tuned '94 GPX) and at the first roundabout the ITR washed out.... and continued to not impress for the rest of the trip.

It simply wasn't as fun to drive, wasn't as grippy, wasn't as nimble, wasn't as quick, wasn't as fast, wasn't as comfortable, wasn't as stylish (inside and out) and sounded nowhere even close to as awesome as my 100,000 mile+ FTO. The 'not handling or gripping as well' really was a surprise, but I was there to buy and on the strength of the test-drive... I didn't. Simple as that.

Then again, I used to hunt Imprezas for sport in the FTO and I suspect without the catalyst and with exhaust/filter, it was probably punching closer to 220hp. Neither car has much torque, I think the ITR had 130ishlbft, and the stock MIVEC V6 equipped FTO 150ish... mine maybe a tad more. :D
 
As mentioned up there, I drove a brand new '98/'99 UK spec Acura-style nose ITR on a test-drive to replace my own FTO (lowered/mild tuned '94 GPX) and at the first roundabout the ITR washed out.... and continued to not impress for the rest of the trip.

My experience between the two was significantly different, and both crucially stock vehicles.

The FTO had a very nice engine, but wasn't up there dynamically compared to the DC2 ITR. VTi-R was a different story, but chalk me up in the majority for those that say the DC2 ITR is one of the greatest FWD vehicles.

The FTO is in my view very close, level even, with a VTi-R, and wipes the floor with the equivalent Celica, even the twin-cam 2ZZ-GE ZR, for fun factor. It cannot be denied though that the FTO outgrunts the both of them considerably.
 
Last edited:
Probably a stock rubber difference or something but I don't believe for a second a GPX has the equipment on a ITR.

The GP Version R was basically made to bridge that equipment gap, including better rubber, brakes and suspension.

The ITR has a Massive Power to weight Advantage on the FTO in general though that makes it hard to bridge the gap, whether the UK spec gets a watered down version or not may be the difference, but from what I have seen and felt my eyes don't lie.
 
Back