Which is when you improvise.
But then you forget the things that comic doesn't mention - like all the pollution involved in manufacturing a gasoline car or its motor/battery/body/nickel-plated "chrome" wheels and trim/engine oil/gearbox oil/refrigerant/coolant/carbon-fiber matrix resin/plastic/safety glass/etcetera, plus the pollution it might produce at the end of its life cycle if not responsibly disposed of. If gasoline cars go fully mainstream, and there are people trying hard to make that happen even though it'll push every last drop of coolness out of the horse-racing scene, there's a good chance some of them willend up abandoned and covered in graffiti at the end of a secluded dirt road somewhere(oh wait... that's already happened!), left to leak toxic chemicals into the ground forever. (toxic chemicals like gasoline, engine oil, refrigerant, coolant, etcetera)
And that's not even the point. The Sunfire is possibly the best example of a car being tainted by its owner base - obnoxious conservatives who think they'reMother EarthHeroes because they've given up on things like fuel economy and not standing in the hot sun all day pumping gasoline in favor of poor fuel economy, a rattly ride and the ability to rev their engines at Prius owners at the stoplight.
Exactly. Forgotten. They're the "It doesn't have to be fun/I'm not going to mod it because it's only a daily driver/family car/temporary wheels while I finish __________" type of enthusiasts.
No, we're just car enthusiasts.Exactly. Forgotten. They're the "It doesn't have to be fun/I'm not going to mod it because it's only a daily driver/family car/temporary wheels while I finish __________" type of enthusiasts.
Thank you! I have a minivan that was given to me. Doesn't mean I don't like a big bad muscle car.An enthusiast is an enthusiast no matter what they drive. Sometimes circumstances in one's live dictates they drive something that isn't a sports car or even a sporty car.
I know this might be a shock, but there are places in the world that are outside of America which don't burn coal with impunity. Where I do most of my driving, the power is 80-85% nuclear, wind, and hydroelectric, and the 15% that isn't from those three sources is primarily natural gas. Not that this matters, because this conveniently ignores how much of a mess the supply chain for gasoline is, but hey, don't let that get in the way of mocking those "misinformed" hippies.Prius logic.![]()
Exactly. Forgotten. They're the "It doesn't have to be fun/I'm not going to mod it because it's only a daily driver/family car/temporary wheels while I finish __________" type of enthusiasts.
I know this might be a shock, but there are places in the world that are outside of America which don't burn coal with impunity. Where I do most of my driving, the power is 80-85% nuclear, wind, and hydroelectric, and the 15% that isn't from those three sources is primarily natural gas. Not that this matters, because this conveniently ignores how much of a mess the supply chain for gasoline is, but hey, don't let that get in the way of mocking those "misinformed" hippies.
Damnit! The Cadillac Cimmaron came out as less cool than the Prius... I wanted to have the most uncool car in the world...
Can't deny that the Cadillac is less cool, though.
And inside. Washington state is 90% hydroelectric, with the remainder being natural gas and nuclear. And we have a large amount of wind farms built as well, now that I think about it.
If the Prius was made out of electricity, that would be perfect then wouldn't it? Unfortunately you can't build a Prius with windmill power. Toyota themselves admit that the production of its lightweight Prius requires more energy and emits more carbon dioxide than the production of its gas-only models. I suggest some people read up a bit on the facts about Hybrid car production instead of whatever Al Gore says. Here's a start:
http://science.howstuffworks.com/sc...r-production-waste-offset-hybrid-benefits.htm
If you actually understand the point of the comic you posted, you'd realize it isn't talking about the production energy at all, but rather the emissions foot print of simply changing the point of combustion from the vehicle to a coal/oil electric plant. But given it took you more than a few posts to grasp the indirect Sunbird reference, along with your amusement over pointlessly destroying something paired with the Smile Per Gallon bit, I'm not certain we can count on that from you. I suggest you read up a bit on perspective instead of just banging your fists on your chest and playing the man card.
So somehow me failing to recognize a poorly constructed sarcastic comment over the internet, my amusement over the destruction of an car (that was over 200,000 miles, not in running condition and was going to be scrapped anyways) and my choice to to sacrifice gas mileage for a better driving experience detracts from my intelligence? I don't think I'm the one playing the "man card" mate![]()
The only Man card I'm playing is the "I'm tired of your tripe" card.
Your poor attempts to play libtard card
and playing the man card.
If the Prius was made out of electricity, that would be perfect then wouldn't it? Unfortunately you can't build a Prius with windmill power. Toyota themselves admit that the production of its lightweight Prius requires more energy and emits more carbon dioxide than the production of its gas-only models. I suggest some people read up a bit on the facts about Hybrid car production instead of whatever Al Gore says. Here's a start:
http://science.howstuffworks.com/sc...r-production-waste-offset-hybrid-benefits.htm
But do the environmental impacts of hybrid vehicle production outweigh the long-term benefits of driving a cleaner running automobile? That answer is a resounding "no." If you drive both a conventional and hybrid car for 160,000 miles (257,495 kilometers), the conventional vehicle requires far more energy to operate and emits far more greenhouse gases over its lifetime, significantly canceling out any imbalance during the production stage [source: Burnham et al].
Depends I know people who have had crappy cars that took care of them but they still fell apart.I think you can make any car last as long as you want with the right care.
I think you can make any car last as long as you want with the right care.
Depends I know people who have had crappy cars that took care of them but they still fell apart.
I don't think you get that school and living on your own costs tens of thousands of dollars a year. Being a car enthusiast doesn't mean I have free money to piss away for the sake of affirming my masculinity.
I drive a Corolla because it was already paid for, low mileage, and my parents were willing to hand it down to me. There is zero logic to buying a different car at this point.
It's almost like Alaska and living in a different province of Canada than your car is registered to are entirely different things.... The insurance on an automatic Corolla is over 2 grand a year for me, I don't even want to think about anything more sporty. I make 600 bucks a month. I'm not going to piss half of that away on car insurance. I understand where you're coming from, that a true car enthusiast would make the best of their situation, but the problem is with taxes, insurance, gas prices, tuition, and rent, it makes absolutely zero sense for me to do anything but run the cheapest car I can.Like I keep saying. The insurance on this car is less than a day's wages, and the gas mileage, while admittedly not as good as a 4-cyl, isn't really that bad.
Since it's not really a collector car