- 15,465
- Orange County, NY
- GTP_GT916
- Nii916
It was more a complaint about how, while no one thinks a lack of output or displacement is a problem, everyone thinks hard-touch plastic is evil and any car that doesn't have a totally luxurious interior automatically sucks.
Do you even think before your fingers touch the keyboard?
Wanna explain the love of the RS200? Or the F40? Or the Stratos?
Do you even think before your fingers touch the keyboard? I'd assume they're just randomly bashing into it, but that'd be the hardest-working autocorrect ever.
It has a turbo, it's fuel efficient, reliable, it looks good, it's fun to drive. Personally, I think the sedan looks better than the hatchback.
Sub-Zero.
I own one as well.
The part that annoys me is when I come to a car-related forum and promptly get told "you shoulda got an I4 import, they have better interiors and are safer."
"they have better interiors and are safer."
Seriously uncool, because it's still dull as dishwater to drive. Dull steering, dull throttle response, slow transmission... And I hate the gimmicky motorcycle gauges, too. The LED-screen is flimsy and cheap and there are way too many blank lights in the surround.
That and the selection of subcompacts is relatively small in the U.S. so there's less competition for something that's otherwise fairly average. When you have a dozen extra rivals in Europe or elsewhere the Sonic starts to look a lot less impressive.
Voted meh.
It looks decent for a compact car, and I bet it has lots of LED's.
Because they are. The market under $20-25,000 is typically dominated by European & Japanese cars because in their respective countries, those are the types of cars that the public generally buys, thus the cars must meet a certain criteria of overall build quality. In the US, that's not really the case because we typically buy mid-size cars & pick up trucks, hence why US manufacturers typically fall behind in that sub-compact market, yet find much more success in the others.I'm talking about cheap, entry-level cars like this. Interior quality and smooth refinement are far from important, especially since, if you're buying a car like that, you probably can't afford a second car just to have fun with on weekends (I can't). I know most people don't care about fun to drive, but most people aren't here. The part that annoys me is when I come to a car-related forum and promptly get told "you shoulda got an I4 import, they have better interiors and are safer."
Having been able to actually ride in a '10 Aveo, that particular one was seriously uncool.
* the ride felt like you were on a buckboard. You felt everything underneath you going down the road.
* rattle trap, noisy interior, and exterior noise was not much better.
* gutless wonder, can't get out of it's own way. Attempting to merge on to a highway with a 70mph. flow was damn near impossible. That Mack truck was getting bigger and bigger in the mirror with each passing second.
Is the '12+ any better ? IDK ... If it's anything like it's predecessor, then it remains seriously uncool. I'll be nice and give it the benefit of the doubt and bump it up 1 notch to just an uncool.
my Suzuki was in and out of the shop
It wouldn't shift out of park countless times, and the paint would melt off of the doors for no apparent reason. I filed a lemon law suit and Suzuki bought it back, along with giving me back all the money I'd already paid in. I didn't even have the car for a year. I took my money and went to Toyota.