Hold on a sec, what's boring about a GTI?
And if you're just talking about the Golf, I imagine the Golf is far more interesting than anything else in the segment, save possible the Mazda 3.
And if you're just talking about the Golf, I imagine the Golf is far more interesting than anything else in the segment, save possible the Mazda 3.
Did you Brits get screwed over again and get stuck with a lesser version of the same Japanese car in the States?
Did you Brits get screwed over again and get stuck with a lesser version of the same Japanese car in the States?
YSSMANDid you Brits get screwed over again and get stuck with a lesser version of the same Japanese car in the States?
Not really to be honest - I think The Cracker might be exaggerating a little - personally the only Mazdas I'm not particularly interested in are the 3 and the 5, and I like the rest of their range a lot (especially the Mazda2). But regarding the 3 mentioned, it again suffers against competitors offering things that are a bit more interesting. But even then I'd still have a 3 over a Golf.
Although it's more than competent at what it does, The Mazda 3 is just dull to the point of being invisible. The Golf is also good, but it also has an image. You own a Golf and it says about you that you appreciate quality German engineering (whether that is actually technically correct or not anymore). You own a Focus because it has a great chassis. You own an Astra because you either enjoy understeer and poor feeling through the steering wheel or you got lumped with one as a company car. You own an Audi A3 because everyone else in you modern city centre appartment block drives Golfs. You're a 'sales executive' who aspire's to be a contestant on The Apprentice so you buy a 1-Series. You like the VAG image but want to be a step away from the Golf/A3 crowd so you buy a Leon. You think that all those stories about French cars being badly screwed together are probably untrue, so you buy a 307 or Megane. You are in your 60's so you buy a Civic. You really don't care about cars or what you drive, so you buy a Corrola (or what ever the equivalent is at the moment) because you've heard they are supposedly reliable. At least Joe Public knows of these cars.
👍
That's pretty true, though I'd argue that oldies no longer buy the Civic because the Jazz exists (I really don't see many elderly people in Civics any more), and people buy French cars because they're still generally more competitively priced than anything else and they're loaded with huge quantities of equipment that may or may not go wrong at some point and be an absolute nightmare. Though I could easily imagine people buy Citroens at the moment for their looks, as they have quite a striking range.
And I doubt many own a Focus because it has a great chassis. They own it because either a) there's a Ford garage on their doorstep or b) because the company gave it to them because they have a contract with Ford and not Vauxhall. 95% of the population wouldn't know a good chassis if a Lotus Elise aluminum spaceframe crashed through their roof.
The one car you did miss is the Volvo C30, which would be my current choice in that class, and is probably more of a rival to the Scirocco than it is to the Golf or any of the other premium/semi-premium small family cars. The looks divide opinion but I think it looks fantastic. I'll have mine with the 5-cyl turbodiesel, thanks.
You think that all those stories about French cars being badly screwed together are probably untrue, so you buy a 307...
...and people buy French cars because they're still generally more competitively priced than anything else
Though I could easily imagine people buy Citroens at the moment for their looks, as they have quite a striking range.
I seriously hate the Sirocco just because its an overpriced Golf for people who just want to look fashionably 1980's. I dont even feel this car does the original one any justice.
This design looks like a less curvy golf...
much like the 3rd generation Taurus.
I did know that it was released in the 70's but I was refering to the second generation when it got into its stride and a time period roughly half the way through the designs life 1974-1992.
I still feel it does not do the original justice party due to the fact that it bares hardly any resemblance at all!
It might be a good looking car but in my opinion its not a Scirocco. It would be like if Audi re-released the original quattro I would expect it to clearly show its lineage in the design, This design looks like a less curvy golf... its more their new corperate face than anything else as the rest of the range is now getting its nose and lights.
As for retro, the first thing that I think when I look at it its Retro!... but I dont see the original in it.
Its my personal viewpoint but it just screams arrogant compared to the golf, which (even as its own ad's suggest) its meant to be an understated yet sophisticated car.
Really? I'd love to see a straw-poll from everyone else on whether they think it looks retro, I really would...
Put me down for absolutely non-retro other than in name. And to be fair, Scirocco was always a better name than Corroded IMO.
fixed.in addition, wasn't Corrado based on MkIII golf which was by far the worst of them? I like the looks and the engine selection, but..