GTP_WRS Week 106 : Monte Clio Infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter MadMax
  • 105 comments
  • 9,384 views
Another quick session this morning, i lost so much consistancy :nervous: best way to get it back is trying i guess :)

18.300
44.250

bb 3/7
 
18.573
44.890

BB 6/4 think I'll try reversing it for my next season and see
 
I noticed lower front/higher rear brake balance helps with getting the car turned in and improve consistency. At least in my case.
 
18.683
45.050
 
Nice track Pekka 👍

19.392
46.509
 
18.967
45.817
 
Under 19 seconds is almost a rarity. Hope I will change that sooner rather than later.

18.825
45.213
 
Is anyone else noticing this same thing as me, so when I view my splits (below) got that for my second run. Then I went back into the time trial just to try a few other things different and the seconds of margine behind when hitting each sector doesn't match up with my current best splits so far. It's weird but here are my splits so far when I viewed my replay. After about 4-5 years of using my GTEYE brake spring I'm starting to notice its wearing out and squeeking when I take my foot off the brake pedal. Time to put in a brand new GTEYE brake spring! Least I got backup springs for my pedals 👍

This combo is so fun and addicting! Still lots of time to find for me now. T2 could knock off another tenth or so as well as T1.

18.298
44.248
 
Has anyone noticed if time of day can make a difference, too?
 
Been out for two weeks, saw this combo and I just had to try. First splits for the week.

18.450
44.533
BB 4/6

Been pretty inconsistent with the laps, good T1 -> bad T2 or vice versa. Once I get more time to play around with brake balance, I should be able to find a more comfortable setting.
 
Just had another 30 minute session of learning other lines, this time breaking early for T1 and T7.

Managed to string it together to pummel my previous record!

BB 4/5

18.483
44.500
 
J_Starscream
I noticed lower front/higher rear brake balance helps with getting the car turned in and improve consistency. At least in my case.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the tip, I've now started using 4/6 and gained a few tenths keep going too fast or too slow into the chicane just can't get it just right. Will get another go tomorrow.
 
mistersafeway
18.250
44.067

Bad third sector so I only improved by a tenth. Seen 18.18 at T1 but panicked, these splits are only a few laps later.
Click to expand...
Well done, that's insanely quick! :bowdown:
 
Apologies for the double

18.512
44.862
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Only getting round to posting my new splits can you tell where I made a mistake :lol:

18.299
44.765

It's all in the second sector for me hope to have another go later.

Ph1sher
Is anyone else noticing this same thing as me, so when I view my splits (below) got that for my second run. Then I went back into the time trial just to try a few other things different and the seconds of margine behind when hitting each sector doesn't match up with my current best splits so far. It's weird but here are my splits so far when I viewed my replay.
Click to expand...
Yea I've noticed this it's a littile confusing at times you can't tell from the sector time whether you've just matched your time or not.
 
18.304
44.237

found another .05 in the final so it's a tenth at the line - curious what you consider perfect up the hill @mistersafeway

monkeywall
you can't tell from the sector time whether you've just matched your time or not.
Click to expand...
That's because the game is running at 60 frames per sec so there's a steady shot available every .0.1666666666... sec. Splits in the replay are always the last frame before the real sector time you saw when driving.
 
Last edited:
Meister Fetz
That's because the game is running at 60 frames per sec so there's a steady shot available every .0.1666666666... sec. Splits in the replay are always the last frame before the real sector time you saw when driving.
Click to expand...
So basically all of our recorded times are actually marginally slower than they actually were?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back