Well, to my knowledge, the F40 is a race/track designed car. Very low weight and very specificly made.
The R35 is a road going car that is weighed down with all the usual gizmos that come with newer cars, and wasn't built primarily for track racing.
Like I say, I'm certainly no expert. It's just my perception.
GT-R is too easy to drive in Prologue to really like it.And no H-gate shifting!Fast but boering.F40,not so easy,but very rewarding,REAL old time super-car.
that's wrong the GT-R does 100mph in 8.9sec
it does 0-100-0 in 13.9sec....you read EVO yeh?
but you have to remember that the f40 is a much much older car, and a lot has happend on the car front, i dont think the f40 can touch the new gtr`s time round the old nurburgring
I'm sorry, but that can't be right. Am I on the same page here? We're talking about the new Nissan Skyline GTR R35 right?
There is absolutely no way that car is faster than a Ford GT or F40, I've seen a video report which compares a BMW M3, Porsche GT (can't remember which ... they're all the same!) and an R35. The R35 was marginally faster than the Porsche and about 4 seconds faster than the beemer. You can't seriously tell me that the Ford GT and F40 are in the same speed range as those three? Sure it may be harder to drive, but it just means you have to be a better driver to get the most out of it.
I think an NSX Type-R would manage to keep up with the GTR.
OK the Mines R34 is a wicked car in GT5p but imagine how wicked the Mines R35 GTR will be in the full GT5!!!!![]()
i agree, a real handfull, and much moore satisfying to drive (but maybe not as fast) fast and easy is boring, tried the f1 2007 and sold it cause it was so boring to drive (fast but to easy)