If you could resurrect one dead car brand...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smart_Roadster
  • 132 comments
  • 6,213 views
Morris.
I mean come on! Who doesn't want to drive around in 2010s spec versions of these bad boys!

morris_ital_estate_1.jpg

morris-minor1-fron_1795826b.jpg
 
I'm inclined to say Pontiac.
They really missed the ball when dropping that line.

The Solstice was a hugely under-rated and under-appreciated car (Keichi Tsuchiya said it was better than the Miata).


The G8 was some what stylish and sporting a great engine with RWD (imho it was one of the best options for an American car with some grunt).

A few of the other cars they had weren't bad but I wouldn't say they are good enough to mention here (G6, etc.).
Finally, a few of their old and dead cars could be great for a comeback, stuff like the Firebird could easily be renewed thanks to the new Camaro and the variety of engine options GM offers. 👍

I'm sure there was a good enough reason to kill Pontiac but at the moment I can't really think of many other dead brands I'd like to see come back.

Maybe if GM just made a PPP option for a few cars it would be a good way to bring the company back to life? ("ppp"- Pontiac Performance Package) :sly:
 
Pontiac. Always loved how they go the extra step to completely overdo a car. What the 5th gen Firebird could have looked like:
002-hurst-edition-trans-am628opt.jpg

3851_3851_005-hurst-edition-trans-am-fp5.jpg



2nd choice, for chits and giggles, SAAB.
Saab still exists, they make electric cars in Europe.
 
Many of these have been mentioned and some are hanging on tenuously, even if only by rights to the name, and some definitely are still around but I wish they would get back to something resembling what they once were:

TVR
Triumph
Marcos
MG
Jensen
Lancia
De Tomaso
Iso
Cord
Duesenberg
Pontiac
Alpine
Saab

I also hope someone really saves Lotus :(
 
Can I list a manufacturer that has simply pulled out of my country and still exists?
If so then I'd say fiat. (The whole product range not just 500s)
 
Checker Motors, I think all taxis should still look like this...I think they just look cool. This is actually an 1982 model...last production year.

 
Every American's answer should be Pontiac, regardless of affiliation with Ford, Chrysler or GM. I'm still appalled at GM's decision to kill pontiac over GMC or Buick. Buicks are boring and stupid, just like their commercials, and GMC is completely worthless because all they would have to do to replace it is add trim levels to Chevys.

If the economy wasn't so crap then they could have sold the nameplate to somebody else, but that didn't work for Lancia. As far as I'm concered, Lancia died with the Delta Integrale, and I don't want it to come back because it could never be as good as it once was.
 
Pontiac. They were one of the few brands still left that had their priorities in the right place, valuing performance above luxury, to the point where they might have even been planning to head for an all-RWD lineup at some point. Unfortunately, GM's fiscal crisis woes cut that plan short, and with the way the markets and the regulatory climate are changing, I don't think anything short of a gearhead takeover of the education system could make a "performance brand", that skimps on luxury and quality to sell cheap performance, feasible ever again. As JMoney said of the Lancia Delta, it could never be as good as it once was - a lineup of true Pontiac cars, conspicuously bare of unnecessary lard, loud, and unrefined, wouldn't sell well in today's gadget-obsessed, driving-apathetic mainstream culture - given an extra $7,500 to spend on their car, most people would rather weigh it down with stupid garbage, screens everywhere and everything-by-wire and what have you, than stuff in a bigger engine. Meanwhile, the obnoxious meddlers in Washington D.C. would force dilution of the lineup with EVs and displacement-downsized high-fuel-efficiency compacts, with the latter being also the product of market forces - not enough people would be willing to sacrifice fuel economy for speed.

So, good luck to anyone attempting to abide by these sports-brand guiding principles:

-FWD sucks. It has no place in the lineup.

-Engines with four cylinders arranged in a line, and all engines with fewer than four cylinders, suck. They have no place in the lineup.

-Turbochargers do not replace displacement. That's just wrong on principle no matter how well it works.

-Anything that is related to controlling the mechanical bits of the car and includes the phrase "by wire", such as drive-by-wire, brake-by-wire, and steer-by-wire, also suck and have no place in the lineup. If we want to accelerate smoothly, we'll operate the gas and clutch in a smooth way, not rely on a computer to smooth out our inputs. 'Tis better to have to put out that small amount of effort than have a stupid DBW system continuing to dull your response when you want the full force the car is capable of.

-Electric power steering may also suck, and if it does it has no place in the lineup.

-True manual transmissions, however, do not suck. They must be available in every model offered, regardless of engine or other options.

-No touchscreens or other computerized "infotainment" devices allowed anywhere. If including a function makes the dash/console too complicated to operate without significant distraction, that function doesn't get included. As for navigation, may we suggest Rand McNally?

-SUVs are SUVs, wagons are wagons. Attempting to combine the two just makes them both worse.

-Anyone who uses a term like "specific output" or "horsepower per liter" will be fired on the spot.

-Engine displacement will be listed in official advertising materials in cubic inches, not liters.

If, on the other hand, you want to build boring, overly-posh, incredibly overweight cars like PostBankruptcyGM, simply contradict most of those principles.
 
Last edited:
I would say Pontiac just because it is what it is but I want to see what Vector could do if it came back full force, came back with the original concept of a pure American supercar.
 
Back