- 5,230
- Buckeye Nation
I'm willing to make any adjustments / amendments to this new thread. Provided that it can be agreed upon by the forum.
There have been comments about why a numbering system. The old thread started out that way, nobody complained about that, so I figured, why not ? Now all of a sudden, we have this aspect about the new thread. Why do we need a numbering system associated with a trader ? My question will be this. Do we or do we not want a numbering system associated beside our name ? Yes or No ? If we can all agree, or come to a majority conclusion, I will make the necessary changes, either by continuing the numbering system, or going in and deleting all numbers associated with the names listed. There is a flip side of this same coin though. Some have made mention that they were a XXX number trader in the old thread, and now they are a 1 trader, a 2 trader, or a trader with no number. They seem to be bothered by by this.That sort of tells me that they were on the side of seeing their name with an associated number beside it. So now we as a forum have a bridge to cross. It would seem as if no matter which way we go on this, that some one, or some group will get their toes stepped on (pending the decision as to whether or not we use a numbering system). I'm willing to go either way. You, as a forum can decide and I will make the appropriate changes in the thread.
So for now, lets attempt to come to some sort of an agreeance on whether or not to use a numbering system. After that, we can move on to another aspect of this thread.
Thanks
There have been comments about why a numbering system. The old thread started out that way, nobody complained about that, so I figured, why not ? Now all of a sudden, we have this aspect about the new thread. Why do we need a numbering system associated with a trader ? My question will be this. Do we or do we not want a numbering system associated beside our name ? Yes or No ? If we can all agree, or come to a majority conclusion, I will make the necessary changes, either by continuing the numbering system, or going in and deleting all numbers associated with the names listed. There is a flip side of this same coin though. Some have made mention that they were a XXX number trader in the old thread, and now they are a 1 trader, a 2 trader, or a trader with no number. They seem to be bothered by by this.That sort of tells me that they were on the side of seeing their name with an associated number beside it. So now we as a forum have a bridge to cross. It would seem as if no matter which way we go on this, that some one, or some group will get their toes stepped on (pending the decision as to whether or not we use a numbering system). I'm willing to go either way. You, as a forum can decide and I will make the appropriate changes in the thread.
So for now, lets attempt to come to some sort of an agreeance on whether or not to use a numbering system. After that, we can move on to another aspect of this thread.
Thanks