The highest power is what gives the greatest acceleration. Torque at the engine and torque at the wheels are not the same thing, because the gear ratio changes the relationship. So shifting gear to go from lower engine torque to higher engine torque doesn't necessarily increase torque at the wheels. It's best to just look at power, as more power must equal more acceleration (because the rate of input of kinetic energy into the car must be determined by power).Dunno bout the above but I've always been under the impression ideally you want to be shifting so in the next year your RPM is very close to peak torque. Maximizes acceleration in the next gear.
To be honest probably heard peak power when I first heard it, I cant recall it was a while ago. I don't personally do it myself because I don't have the patience /will power to learn the peak power or torque range of every car I drive in a sim. But yeah.The highest power is what gives the greatest acceleration. Torque at the engine and torque at the wheels are not the same thing, because the gear ratio changes the relationship. So shifting gear to go from lower engine torque to higher engine torque doesn't necessarily increase torque at the wheels. It's best to just look at power, as more power must equal more acceleration (because the rate of input of kinetic energy into the car must be determined by power).
It's perhaps easier to understand if you think about cycling. You don't accelerate fast by using the longest gear and pressing with enormous force on the pedals. That gives you huge torque at the pedals, but pathetic torque at the wheels. You accelerate fastest by using a gear and cadence that allows you to output the most power. In a sprint finish in an elite cycling race, a sprinter might output around 1400W, and they'll be using a high cadence, say 120+ rpm. Their torque on the pedals is relatively low, pretty much any human can apply the torque they are using. What most humans can't do is combine that torque with the speed of movement to deliver that power.
peak torque and power are not the same, power is the product of torque and rpm. Many cars make peak torque really early in their power curve and dont make much power at peak torque.Dunno bout the above but I've always been under the impression ideally you want to be shifting so in the next year your RPM is very close to peak torque. Maximizes acceleration in the next gear.
I'm well aware they aren't the same thing.peak torque and power are not the same, power is the product of torque and rpm. Many cars make peak torque really early in their power curve and dont make much power at peak torque.
Who has time to look at a tachometer? There are flashing lights for a reason. There are also ears on one's head.For all the useless info they crammed into the HUD, you'd think they'd have room for a tach.
Gee I wonder why they exist on just about every car ever made.Who has time to look at a tachometer?
An example of a car without one... my GF old Punto (2002 model) didn't have one, to be fair though she was rarely trying to optimise her shift points...Gee I wonder why they exist on just about every car ever made.
In the power restrictor menu it shows your power and torque curves, unfortunately it is a very simplistic graph and doesn't give you any details on what rpm peak power or torque are made - the only reference is the rev limit.1) Where do I generate dyno graphs in GT7?
When you adjust the power in the car settings, it shows a graph. You want to maximise the area under the curve, so if it's a peaky shape you shift at some point after the peak, so the power drops to the same power before the peak as you had after the peak. You have to use bumper cam to relate the red bar to rpm, then you can use any view and work to the red bar. The optimal shift point is different for each gear, because the rpm doesn't drop by the same amount for each shift. This is assuming the game correctly implements all this, of course. Most people, myself included, don't bother to work out the optimal shift point for each gear. I do generally look at the graph, estimate what a good rpm to shift at would be, and quickly use bumper cam to work out where that is on the red bar.However, I still wouldn't know when to shift; would it be as soon as RPMs drop off as @talha1 suggested for the Dodge Viper?
I have three main questions from here:
1) Where do I generate dyno graphs in GT7?
2) How would I use the dyno graphs to get the ideal RPM shifts?
So in the ECU graph, is the white/gray line the power per gear, and blue is the last gear?Not an easy question at all to answer. In real life, it's slightly easier to do as you can feel the acceleration g forces with your body and gauge when to shift from there. Absent that, it's just down to using one's eyes and ears to gauge. You can also get an idea of when to shift a car if you were to take a look at its power and torque curves in the ECU/ Power Limiter menus in the Setting Sheets of your cars. Generally speaking, you'd want to shift the car a little past the rpm when it makes peak power. The farther apart the gears are, the more you'd want to rev it past peak power.
(I know the R34 isn't a very good example but those are the screenshots I've lying around)
I'd recommend changing the distance units from miles to kilometres, as this changes speed measurement from mph to km/h. With a finer unit, one can more easily ascertain how much a car is accelerating throughout its rev range. From there, it's just a matter of trail, error, and observation.
In Gran Turismo Sport, there was a very useful fan site called GT Engine that details when race cars are best shifted in theory versus what got drivers the best results in practice. As of writing, their GT7 page is still being built and thus rather barebones, though the shift points data should still carry over into GT7 unchanged. Here's a link to their GTS Gr.3 page as an example:
![]()
As a general rule, I find that GTS (and GT7) tends to reward short shifting more than it perhaps should. Even Wankel Engines, notorious for being peaky in real life, tend to fare better in GTS with a bit of short shifting (787B, RX-Vision, FD RX-7).
The white line is the torque curve and the blue line is the power curve. I don't fully understand what's the difference between power and torque myself, but here's a video you might find helpful.Thanks all for the responses.
So in the ECU graph, is the white/gray line the power per gear, and blue is the last gear?
Yep doesn't show what rpm peak figures are produced at, but if you go into the garage on the main screen which shows various angles of your car, on the left hand side it will actually show you peak power@rpm figures.In the power restrictor menu it shows your power and torque curves, unfortunately it is a very simplistic graph and doesn't give you any details on what rpm peak power or torque are made - the only reference is the rev limit.
Says who!?There are also ears on one's head.
The rev counter above the speedometer doesn't even fill a little (presumably that is 5000 to 7000 RPM)
Should I be shifting up at this point??!?!? Despite not wringing the last 2,000RPM out of the engine?
Thanks friend. Amazing explanationGo to Car Settings, enter ECU or Power Restrictor and look that power curve.
My number aren't exactly same as yours but the nearest one is Normal turbo, and on my graph it's an (almost) flat blue line over 5,800 rpm, so that means you can use all the RPMs and the acceleration won't be worse.
If the line drops sharply after max RPM, then you now have to consider shifting early.
But ... perhaps not shifting AT the max power RPM, because after you shift up, engine RPM will drop to a lower value, you don't want power output at that RPM lower than when you shifting, so it could probably better to shift a little after peak RPM.
View attachment 1156364
For example in this configuration of GR Supra Race Car '19 if I shift up at 6500 rpm I'll drop to 4500~5000 RPM, which is kind of OK that I won't lose too many power.
View attachment 1156365
This is another example from Aston Martin DP-100 where max power at 6500 RPM. If I shift exactly at 6500 RPM I'll go to 4750~5500 RPM and would still get good power (perhaps a little later is still fine). But if I go all the way to 8500 RPM then after shifting up I'll down to 6750~7500 RPM where the power output is nowhere near it's peak.
Too bad GT7 didn't have finer ticks on these graph, you have to do some mental arithmetic to at least get the value at 1/2, 3/4 mark,
Thanks for sharing the link, what a beautiful website. Unless someone found a way to get raw data from the game, those dyno curves will have to have been scanned from game screenshots into graphing software or measured on screen or paper by hand. Lots of effort either way, and the result looks really professional.Not an easy question at all to answer. In real life, it's slightly easier to do as you can feel the acceleration g forces with your body and gauge when to shift from there. Absent that, it's just down to using one's eyes and ears to gauge. You can also get an idea of when to shift a car if you were to take a look at its power and torque curves in the ECU/ Power Limiter menus in the Setting Sheets of your cars. Generally speaking, you'd want to shift the car a little past the rpm when it makes peak power. The farther apart the gears are, the more you'd want to rev it past peak power.
(I know the R34 isn't a very good example but those are the screenshots I've lying around)
I'd recommend changing the distance units from miles to kilometres, as this changes speed measurement from mph to km/h. With a finer unit, one can more easily ascertain how much a car is accelerating throughout its rev range. From there, it's just a matter of trail, error, and observation.
In Gran Turismo Sport, there was a very useful fan site called GT Engine that details when race cars are best shifted in theory versus what got drivers the best results in practice. As of writing, their GT7 page is still being built and thus rather barebones, though the shift points data should still carry over into GT7 unchanged. Here's a link to their GTS Gr.3 page as an example:
![]()
As a general rule, I find that GTS (and GT7) tends to reward short shifting more than it perhaps should. Even Wankel Engines, notorious for being peaky in real life, tend to fare better in GTS with a bit of short shifting (787B, RX-Vision, FD RX-7).
Very good explanation there.