Has a Lotus roadcar ever had a brilliant engine? I thought generally the Lotus philosophy is basically just shed weight and the engine is just the thing that pushes/pulls the car. As long as the engine does its job, Lotus do the rest of the performance work.
I imagine the Toyota engines are also cheap which factors in too.
Both sides are keen on a deal, which is expected to include road car tie-ins.
As long as they keep their flagship model to Colin Chapman's ideals (Which at the moment would be the Elise/Exige),
then there is no problem with straying away from the whole Lighter/Simple = Better philosophy. I mean, they've already done that with the Evora; Fitted a bigger, more powerful engine and made it heavier and slower than an Exige (and to some extent the Europa S too).
I was just going to come and post about the Renault rumours, damn you Seismica!
That would answer the question of what they are going to do to replace the 1.8 Toyota engines possibly?
A bit worried about Luxury.
1) I believe a difficult market, where the big boys are playing (recently with SLS AMG, R8, ...)
2) Complex = lot of investment = lot of risk
3) For me a Lotus 7, Elise, Exige, etc... is Lotus.
The Esprit, etc ... are nice, but do not hold the same Lotus spirit. Will the market understand?
Lotus have the expertise to make fast cars. But luxury cars? I have my doubts. Though it depends what sort of market they are going in to.
Has a Lotus roadcar ever had a brilliant engine? I thought generally the Lotus philosophy is basically just shed weight and the engine is just the thing that pushes/pulls the car. As long as the engine does its job, Lotus do the rest of the performance work.
I imagine the Toyota engines are also cheap which factors in too.
Lotus will look like a very different company in the next year or two, and so will their cars.
Was the twin turbo L6 in the Carlton not a brilliant engine, if not maybe too heavy at a guess?
Was the twin turbo L6 in the Carlton not a brilliant engine, if not maybe too heavy at a guess?
I really hope the new Esprit looks good, too many manufacturers lately are showing concepts/making cars that try too hard to look futuristic and end up looking average.
Like I said, Lotus take what they can find for an engine and then do the rest of the work.
They are more than capable of developing their own engines but it is hideously expensive to get them approved for sale worldwide so it's much more profitable to use an existing engine.
Indeed, don't forget they basically redesigned the engine of the C4 Corvette ZR-1 ( meaning the engine of the ZR-1 was developed by Lotus ) and why design a completely new engine when there are plenty of good ones to futher improve around.
Lotus has officially confirmed that it will show a concept for an upmarket supercar at the Paris motor show in September.
In the latest of a series of cryptic statements, the Malaysian-owned, Norfolk-based sports car company reveals its new show car will be “perhaps even more” than a replacement for the mid-engined Esprit supercar — which it pointedly reminds us was first unveiled as a Giugiaro-designed concept at the Paris show exactly 35 years ago.
Lotus has been working for at least three years on various iterations of an Esprit replacement, but the company’s latest management, led by ex-Ferrari commercial boss Danny Bahar, has signalled a decisive move upmarket for all future products, apparently into Ferrari-Aston territory.
Lotus spokesmen are hazy about future product, but agree that the new concept is an accurate guide to their future intentions for production models.
When sales ended in 2004, volume of the old Esprit — which lasted 18 years through a dozen different models — amounted to 10,700 cars.
I approve Evora S. But IPS..? Not sure if want..
Isn't Evora IPS first lotus with automatic box?
Yes, I've read the whole article, I still think it is not enough.
I would like to see a Lotus supercar with the looks of the Evora, make it a "cheap" F458 competitor, that would be cool.