Lunar roving vehicle????!!!!!

Discussion in 'Gran Turismo 6' started by Chameleon9000, Nov 4, 2013.

  1. christara321

    christara321 Premium

    Messages:
    6,224
    Location:
    England
    Oh my gosh :D Just came across this.



    Check out around 2 mins 30....
     
    CallmeDan, dolande, Theace37 and 11 others like this.
  2. MustangManiac

    MustangManiac Premium

    Messages:
    2,110
    Location:
    United States
    Well, at least the red bull looks like it belongs on the moon :sly:
     
    poumpoum, JK83 and christara321 like this.
  3. SkilledRacer

    SkilledRacer

    Messages:
    394
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    This would probably be the only hack I would accept on GT6 :p other then slamming cars etc. :p
     
    christara321 likes this.
  4. Sonygamer455

    Sonygamer455

    Messages:
    4,397
    Location:
    United States
    @2:45
    Houstan we have lift off! :lol:

    Well I guess that answers projectwat's question he asked on the last page. ;) Thanks for posting that christara321! :):tup:

    The next thing I would like to know is if that person was doing the mission itself or if he managed to make the track available elsewhere. So many questions....
     
  5. Lubeify100

    Lubeify100

    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    United States
    Now they need to make a moon rally race somehow! I'd play that online if they made that a track lol
     
    ChrisFax4Ever likes this.
  6. Sonygamer455

    Sonygamer455

    Messages:
    4,397
    Location:
    United States
    If people use this online a lot, they will have it patched in no time more than likely. Be best to keep it offline in my opinion.
     
  7. JK83

    JK83 Premium

    Messages:
    3,384
    Location:
    Finland
    Trust me, peoples doesn't use that online.
     
  8. Sonygamer455

    Sonygamer455

    Messages:
    4,397
    Location:
    United States
    Well what I am saying is "if" they did. Granted that they actually can make it available online somehow.
     
  9. Lubeify100

    Lubeify100

    Messages:
    979
    Location:
    United States
    That's true
     
  10. Downhill Dino

    Downhill Dino Premium

    Messages:
    11,632
    Location:
    United States
  11. JK83

    JK83 Premium

    Messages:
    3,384
    Location:
    Finland
    That car shoot much higher without 200kg ballast and full downforce.
    Anyway nice work with great .gif :tup:
     
    christara321 likes this.
  12. tube chaser

    tube chaser

    Messages:
    99
    Location:
    South Africa
    A little bedtime reading for all who enjoyed the LRV Special Event :tup:
     
  13. unit-one

    unit-one

    Messages:
    3,539
    Location:
    Estonia
    Can it be used in the Photo travel locations?
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2014
  14. PNuTButR

    PNuTButR

    Messages:
    404
    Location:
    Scotland
    Surely on the moon its downforce wouldn't matter? :sly:

    In the video of the Ford and the Red Bull on the moon, they are both affected by the physical conditions, so the low-gravity is part of the moon. :)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 16, 2014
  15. PsuPepperoni

    PsuPepperoni Premium

    Messages:
    2,187
    Location:
    United States
    Weight wouldn't matter either. A hammer falls as quickly as a feather on the moon.
     
    GTPVenomZombie likes this.
  16. diegorborges

    diegorborges

    Messages:
    4,402
    Location:
    Brazil
    Ok, this is a cool hack.

    They should let us drive in the moon. GO nuts.
     
  17. huguh

    huguh

    Messages:
    12
    Location:
    Portugal
    Well, if the hammer was about the same dimensions as the feather, they would fall at the same rate here on earth too..
    The air resistant is what makes the hammer fall first due to its "aerodynamic" shape, not the weight..
     
  18. PaMu1337

    PaMu1337

    Messages:
    2,544
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Not entirely true. The effect of air resistance is greater on lighter objects (the force will be the same, but the acceleration will differ).
     
    huguh and PsuPepperoni like this.
  19. PsuPepperoni

    PsuPepperoni Premium

    Messages:
    2,187
    Location:
    United States
    I agree with your second sentence, but I think a steel feather would still fall faster on earth because it's momentum would allow it to fight drag more efficiently.
     
    huguh likes this.
  20. huguh

    huguh

    Messages:
    12
    Location:
    Portugal
    Physics is a f%#%ed up thing :p
     
    PsuPepperoni likes this.
  21. Griffith500

    Griffith500

    Messages:
    8,633
    Strictly speaking, the acceleration felt by either object is determined by the difference of the force due to gravity (determined by its mass and, well, gravity) and the drag force (determined by its speed, shape and size).

    The reason a steel feather would fall faster than a real one of equivalent shape (feathered steel indeed!) and size is because it weighs more, so its gravity force ("weight") dominates over the drag force up to a higher falling speed. At that point, the acceleration is zero and the speed would have stabilised. Assuming it had the time to get there.

    Momentum is the product of mass and speed, so does not affect the falling rate in itself, rather, it is dependent on it. :)
    However, any rotation imparted when it is dropped will have higher momentum, so the steel feather will not "align" itself to the falling direction as well as a real feather - that would affect its drag force, probably increasing its falling speed even more.


    Weight does matter on the moon, since it still affects how fast things can accelerate on a given force; esp. e.g. climbing hills. I don't think you can get much downforce from non-continuum "fluid" interactions, though, certainly.
     
    suvalle55 likes this.