Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,995 comments
  • 3,479,100 views
There's a lot of problems with this UTE conversion. 1. the guy didn't etc out the Chevrolet thing on the back with a sander. 2. The tailights are ugly. 3. The RX-8 is not exactly a good car to make a UTE out of. 4. That pickup bed is way too small; it's no better than the trunk that use to be there.
 
vw-beetle-pickup-2.jpg


vw-beetle-pickup-large05.jpg
 
Would have been better if it was a New New The Beetle or whatever it's called today.
 
The Current Beetle is just called "Beetle" just like the original Beetle was called that.
 
That UTE beetle remind me of the PT Cruiser in the back...

...I know, that's kinda...err...bad.
 
Custom878
It wasn't even called the Beetle until the 60s I think. It's very confusing. :dunce:
Click to expand...
Yes it is; I think VW at that point was just calling the Beetle "Type 1" or something.
Still very silly, I'm glad VW decide to give it an actual name.
 
It was the Type 1, then the Sedan, then the Beetle I think.
 
Hmm, I once made up a car once called the stallion.
 
I haven't posted a rear pic of the Versa yet, so here goes.
20140327_104026.jpg
 
Gotbeefboy564
Saw this.
Lowered and with ugly rims.
Click to expand...

You're absolutely freaking out of your mind, those are American Racing Torq Trusts IIs, and the car looks absolutely awesome slammed and with those wheels.

Lol, I love how people really do consider a lowered car with cool wheels something questionable. Ridiculous.

EDIT: I didn't really see who wrote that post, but after seeing who did, it's almost self-explanatory.
 
Back