Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,913 comments
  • 3,252,020 views
Looks like the fake grills on the hood are different sizes...haha. Also the one on the left is hanging lower than the hood...geeze. Wheres a fire when you need it?
 
I'll bet that pipe in front of the wheel's fake. geez. Who thought this would look goo...

Never mind. I don't want to know. All I know is that it's a waste of steel, plastic and bondo. They didn't even bother to fill the holes for the production lower trim.
 
What's with all the dials? - Do you really require a large hood mounted rev counter and about half a dozen other dials placed liberally on the dash and up the inside of the A-pillar in a Civic? (or anything else for that matter) - you ain't going anywhere quickly with that wheel/wheel arch/ride height combo anyway.
 
I'm gonna assume it's fast (front-mount, exhaust/retardedly large screamer pipe in front of the wheel) but DAMN if it isn't hideous.
I wouldn't assume it's fast. Look at the front "exhaust cutout" - zero clearance to the plastic bumper. It's almost certainly glued/screwed onto the bumper cover and not connected to the engine at all.

And the alleged "intercooler" is mounted crooked. Somewhere in there is a CRX screaming to be let out.
 
asonnycar1.jpg

CRX + stupid guy + german cars front parts = 100% UGLY
 
I just noticed something awfully incriminating about that "Exhaust"...No. Carbon. Whatsoever inside.

As far as hood mounted tach...meh, got a point. Wasn't even that good when it came stock on Pontiacs.

1970-buick-gsx-3.jpg


Okay, that's a Buick, but, yeah. How can you read that through the windshield?
 
Last edited:
Okay, that's a Buick, but, yeah. How can you read that through the windshield?

Considering a windshield is clear i'd assume you kind of just, oh I don't know, look at it. It's a great idea because you can keep your focus on what's ahead of you but still be able to read it.

It looks dreadful on the ricer though, but so does everything else.
 
That CRX is more ugly then an Edsel. Can I borrow a tank for about 5 mins?
 
DKX
That CRX is more ugly then an Edsel. Can I borrow a tank for about 5 mins?

You know Edsel did have some good looking cars, and what do you expect for the time period they were made. How can you compare such a hideous work of an idiot to an interesting part of American car history.

The words I wish I could say right now.
 
The Kei car looks like they removed the suspension and tossed some wheels up against the side. The black Impreza looks like those African people with those huge lip rings.

But. Yeah.
asonnycar.jpg



asonnycar1.jpg



I'm gonna assume it's fast (front-mount, exhaust/retardedly large screamer pipe in front of the wheel) but DAMN if it isn't hideous.
That reminds me of one of my photoshops :sly:
 
Trgdorcar.jpg


Definitely questionable to name your license plate after a badly drawn dragon from a flash cartoon...Especially with a Morris Minor. but yet, kind of cool. "C'mon! Burninate those tires!"

Would make more sense on a C63 AMG.
 
Re: The CRX.

At what point in the build, after they've already fit an awful bodykit and everything else that's already wrong, do they then think "you know... a BMW grille and some lights from an E-class would really work. Yep, that's what I'm going to fit"

And then, when it couldn't get any worse, and it's all like a bizzare nuclear experiment gone wrong, they must actually think, as they cruise down the street, "yeaaaaah... damn my car looks good..."
 
The Honda above reminded me of something I'd seen previously. This is the closest I could find...

96-00%20honda%20civic%20Type%20S14%20conversion.jpg


Look Closely...those aren't 240SXs...They are, in fact...Honda Civics.
 
The Honda above reminded me of something I'd seen previously. This is the closest I could find...

96-00%20honda%20civic%20Type%20S14%20conversion.jpg


Look Closely...those aren't 240SXs...They are, in fact...Honda Civics.

Those don't look to bad.
 
Get rid of the Dumbo ears, and we just might have a deal.
 
Those don't look to bad.
That's where you'd be wrong.

Quality of workmanship: B+
Quality of idea to graft a Nissan RWD front end onto a Honda FWD car: F-
 
Back