Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,913 comments
  • 3,227,107 views
Alex.
Thanks to Andrew for this :(
1I9F1283.jpg
Click to expand...

That looks awesome :drool:

(The 500, that is)
 
buickgnx88
Can't tell if that is actual crap or a photoshop...
Click to expand...

Considering that it blurs off heavily at the base of windshield and has pixelation all over it, I'm guessing it's real crap.
 
Well, the guy who took the photo claimed it was taken with a crappy mobile phone, he said he'd try to get proper pictures. I guess we'll have to wait and see... that's if anyone could even stand to see it again.
 
Jackington
Quite questionable, this is.

esstangwd7.png
Click to expand...

Unless someone actually did manage to really screw up this picture & the angles, that picture looks so fake, it's not even funny. Look at the sides of the "Mustang" bumper. They don't even blend, as if they were simply pasted onto this picture.
 
The Mustang front looks completely photoshopped, but that image-quality is definitely what I'd expect from a two-three year old phone-camera. I shot a few cars with mine that weren't very much clearer...
 
Jackington
Quite questionable, this is.

esstangwd7.png
Click to expand...

That's a photoshop, easy to tell. You can clearly mark the area where he selected the Mustang bumper, and simply pasted it on this car, whatever this car is. You can even see where he used the blur tool to soften the differences in shape between both cars.

Whatever it is, most hideous thing ever.
 
The mirrors look more rounded on most Century's I believe. Although there may be one model I haven't noticed with more squared ones.

I'm thinking Lexus LS400 like this one (note the wheels to)
01.jpg
 
I want to drop a shipping container on top of that, then burn whatever is left.

Photochop or not, that is the most hideous thing ever.
 
Just how the hell did they do that? Were they trying to make the least appealing car in the world!?
 
To give the Photograph credit: it's actually...

...a 3D model.

Also notice that it's probably stolen, as the artist's signature has been blurred out.
 
I believe it's done using a 3D program, as it looks like a rim in the background just under the 'original' image, plus everything is incredibly reflective.

-edit-

Damn my multi-tab opening habits, too slow.
 
Tinting tail lamps with women's nylons is not a new thing at all. It's actually a pretty cheap way to tint your lights and from what I've see it works decently well for at least a little while. The weather and road grin eventually destroys the nylons.
 
People have been doing this since the beginning of cars. Nothing wrong in doing it IMO, better than some oversprayed, orange-peeled tint from a can :)

Wow, I'm a slow writer..
 

Latest Posts

Back