- 14,427

- Kanagawa, JP
I'm gonna guess they made something biblically offensive/inappropriate and beyond stupid?
It was a Bush did 9/11 car, not exactly the most groundbreaking of jokes
I'm gonna guess they made something biblically offensive/inappropriate and beyond stupid?
It was a Bush did 9/11 car, not exactly the most groundbreaking of jokes
Imagine my reaction. Regardless, I'm giving him another chance to paint a car that meets the AUP. Or if @Davis would just prefer, feel free to contact me or any one of our painters with what you want and we can hook you up asap 👍I'm not even sure how to react to that, honestly.
I may regret this, but considering some of the stuff I've seem from the person in question, I'm not the least bit surprised.![]()
I was expecting something worse than that the way it was being hyped up, is that really all that was bad about it?
Like seriously, I can't be that much worse than either of the joke cars I madehonestly I want to see what you guys are hyping it up to be, dank ass car![]()
Or the MLG one with Comic Sans for the fontHey, if it was aesthetically pleasing, at least, I'd would have run it.
I'm certain it's much better looking then that shrektastic thing Jahgee made.![]()
That was ever funny? I'd say I'm shocked, but then I remember that I'm surrounded by...beings...who would find it funny IRL.It was a Bush did 9/11 car, not exactly the most groundbreaking of jokes
Except this particular "joke" ties into mass murder. Sorry, I don't see where they equate.Sometimes you just have to bust out the vintage memes, and most NR2003 leagues don't feature a Furry Porn website (Even satirically). I personally have no problem with either the political jokes or furry porn, as long as there isn't nudity that would get the video taken down on YouTube, I don't see the issue.
I was referring to things I've seen in the past and not specifically in any threads. But hey whatever. It'd just be best to forget I said anything before yet another thing gets blown out of proportion. Reason number one I've slowed down with posting considerably over the years I've been on here.lol, some of the stuff posted by a dude who literally doesn't post outside his car thread? Ooookay dude.
Would Brazzers be an acceptable sponsor? I'd say yes but some say no.I'm still not sure what the issue is with having FurAffinity as a sponsor. 1) it requires a login to see anything, and 2) the race logo has already been released and it's AUP friendly.
It's not the idea that people died that is funny, it's the idea that people (Some jokingly some seriously) believe that the government orchestrated the attack that is funny.That was ever funny? I'd say I'm shocked, but then I remember that I'm surrounded by...beings...who would find it funny IRL.
Except this particular "joke" ties into mass murder. Sorry, I don't see where they equate.
Personally I would never use it but I wouldn't be butthurt over it.Would Brazzers be an acceptable sponsor? I'd say yes but some say no.
I'm still not sure what the issue is with having FurAffinity as a sponsor. 1) it requires a login to see anything, and 2) the race logo has already been released and it's AUP friendly.
It's not the idea that people died that is funny, it's the idea that people (Some jokingly some seriously) believe that the government orchestrated the attack that is funny.
I think as long as you aren't directly linking to porn, it's fine. Most image hosting sites have porn, but we're allowed to link to them on here as long as we don't post porn.I don't understand the difference. Linking or promoting sexual content in the form of pornographic websites is against the AUP - so why is that suddenly allowed?
Because FurAffinity isn't completely adult material.I don't understand the difference. Linking or promoting sexual content in the form of pornographic websites is against the AUP - so why is that suddenly allowed?
Sometimes you just have to bust out the vintage memes, and most NR2003 leagues don't feature a Furry Porn website (Even satirically). I personally have no problem with either the political jokes or furry porn, as long as there isn't nudity that would get the video taken down on YouTube, I don't see the issue.
I don't understand the difference. Linking or promoting sexual content in the form of pornographic websites is against the AUP - so why is that suddenly allowed?
I think as long as you aren't directly linking to porn, it's fine. Most image hosting sites have porn, but we're allowed to link to them on here as long as we don't post porn.
Having it as a race name for a video hardly counts as "Linking" it. Not even beginning to understand how having it as a name for a fictional series even comes close to "Promoting" it.
Because FurAffinity isn't completely adult material.