rate the above car!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex.
  • 141 comments
  • 4,954 views
Just the Evo please (gosh this is gonna cause arguments): 20/100
Hate this car as much as its rival. just another Japanese piece of rubbish in my opinion.
Koenigsegg CCR Another Motor show picture
 
:GASP:!!!!!

Noooooo, my ratings have dropped from an average of 85% to 45%!!! :eek:


100/100

Aston-Martin-Zagato-DB-AR1-Rear.jpg

Zagato DB7-- HOW YOU GONNA RESIST THAT, B!TCH?!?
 
75/100

Its sort bland looking. But sexy nonetheless. 👍


Imma get a car.


1969%20pontiac%20gto-780755.jpg


1969 Pontiac GTO. :drool: You can't hate this.
 
50/100 Thank god this didn't make it into production, the only reason it gets 50 is that It says "GT" on the side.


*Searching for car*
 
75/100

50 for being a Ferarri, and 25 the sound. -25 for the wheels. Black with a polished lip is what I see on every riced out car I see.

Caparo T1
 
^ Looks a nice car would have one in my garage any day, 87/100
Another one of my Motoring Show Pictures: Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder


Hmmm Gallardo :drool: :drool:
 
^ It's a wannabe Murcielago (500hp version), 40/100. :indiff:


Misubishi Pajero Evolution

pajevfl2.JPG

(:
 
what is it, a regal O_o??
I would give the pajero a 95/100 for its class, looks ruff, and can probably eat a few ricers...
and that car:
50/100
10-its yellow like my car, 10 fat tries, 10 palm tree, 10 it looks sleeper ish... other 10 for first impression.
79mazda626coupe.jpg

1979 Mazda 626 coupe,
 
WHAT!?!?!? How can you not like the veryon, 0-60 in just 2 secs, 0-100 in 3.3 secs, 253 top speed, hydraulic lowering system and hydraulic rear wing both activate when the car reaches 125 MPH, W16 engine with 1001 HP, and you gave it a 65?

BTW, all that is STRAIT FROM THE FACTORY.
 
^ speed isnt everything man....

I think the veyron is ugly as sin. The specs dont mean anything to me unless the car looks good. I'd rather have the other, formerly respect "supercar", the McLaren F1, over the Veyron. IMO :P

ferrari-575-gtc-1597.jpg
 
Is that a road-legal version of the 550/575 GT cars running in the FIA GT? :eek:


95/100, I would wet my pants if I'd see this driving...


On the Bugatti:

Musclecarchris, you were VERY wrong with your numbers there, the Bugatti does your claims in this:

0-60: 2.9 sec.
0-100: 6.0 sec.
1/4 MILE: 10.8 @ 140 mph
topspeed: 253 mph (you were right on this one).

A car that would do 0-100 in 3.3 seconds doesn't exist. Well, one that is road-legal that is...(as far as I know). The above information was taken from the 2006 16.4 Veyron with the Quad-Turbo W16 engine.

On that, take a look at the price: 1.4 million dollars (1.4 million!). For 500,000 less, you can have a '97 Mclaren F1 which looks far more beautiful and which is only 0,3 seconds slower incase of 0-60 mph, 0-100 mph and the 1/4 mile (3.2, 6.3, 11.1 @ 135 mph).

Link to more info and photos: http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/Bugatti/2006/16.4_Veyron/






Aaaaaaaaanywho, on to Toyota's good years then:

MR2zwartRV.jpg
 
^ On the SW20, 70/100. I have high respect for that car, too bad it didn't last too long thats why I gave it a low rating.

Smart-Suzuki ForTwo Hayabusa
smartukilg.jpg

^ I think this is the ultamate sleeper.

(:
 
Back