Indeed. I want an AK from Arsenal, but I cannot decide between 5.45 and 7.62. I am leaning slightly towards 7.62, but many people seem to really like 5.45 and prefer it to the 7.62.
On a different topic, the biggest local gun store had their annual gun expo starting yesterday and going through tomorrow. I went today after leaving work hoping to shoot HK's new VP9. The HK rep did not have a VP9. I was quite disappointed in that because that is what I really wanted to shoot. However, I ended up shooting a Walther P99, Walther PPS, Smith and Wesson M&P9 CORE with Trijicon RMR, HK 45, Springfield Armory 1911 Operator, and a Christensen Arms CA-15 Recon.
The trigger on the Smith and Wesson M&P9 Core is lacking. I had read that many people were disappointed with M&P triggers and the Core was no different. It is severely lacking compared to my PPQ.
The Walther P99 is a very nice pistol. Not surprisingly, the PPQ is very similar to the P99. If I could find a P99 or P99C for a reasonable price, then I would defintely consider picking one up.
If I ever get around to getting my carry license, then I would strongly consider the Walther PPS. While the trigger is not nearly as good as my PPQ, it is still a pretty good trigger. I was able to put together a pretty nice five round group.
I really liked the HK45. The ergonomics are outstanding. The trigger is not great, but good enough and I was able to put together a nice group.
The Springfield Armory 1911 Operator is much different than anything I am acquainted with. The single action trigger was very crisp. I would really have to spend some time with a 1911 to feel comfortable carrying one.
While I am sure Christensen Arms makes a very good AR-15, I do not have enough rifle shooting experience to really comment on the rifle.