Sciaru BRZFRS (BreezeFrees)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Azuremen
  • 5,613 comments
  • 439,126 views
I find it weird to be driving an M-series BMW on cheap knock-offs of almost a decade-old Gislaved NF3. So for the sake of your own safety - avoid ice like you're on summer tires.

I already have driven them on ice. No problems there. They are from the same mold from what I've read, and Tire rack reviewed them at their test center and liked them quite a bit, and the near 800 reviews from customers that are quite positive would say they are solid as well.

But thank you for your concern. By the way, it is a 16 year old BMW, so its not like I dropped 40 grand on the car.

And :lol: at the above about BMW owners and Subaru owners. Especially after this.

boomee
I hate the asinine statement that oh because he is a wrx driver he knows nothing. Kinda like the statement of someone is a BMW driver so their snobbish and stuck up, though many of them are you should never go into assuming that.

Congrats on invalidating what you were just saying.
 
I already have driven them on ice. No problems there. They are from the same mold from what I've read, and Tire rack reviewed them at their test center and liked them quite a bit, and the near 800 reviews from customers that are quite positive would say they are solid as well.
Mold might be the same (after all, continental owns now both general and what's left of gislaved) giving it decent snow/slush traction, but the compound sucks relative to new ice&snow tires. I'm sure all those 800 american drivers are really experienced in their taste of winter tires and are surely on their 10-20th set, not the first ever. Enjoy your outdated technology and, again, be prepared for sub-par ice traction.
 
Christ, it's like kindergarten in here.

Quit with the "my tyre is better than your tyre" stuff. It's irrelevant to the Toyobaru. And if someone says their tyre works in snow, then it probably works in snow.
 
Mold might be the same (after all, continental owns now both general and what's left of gislaved) giving it decent snow/slush traction, but the compound sucks relative to new ice&snow tires. I'm sure all those 800 american drivers are really experienced in their taste of winter tires and are surely on their 10-20th set, not the first ever. Enjoy your outdated technology and, again, be prepared for sub-par ice traction.

Because you personally tested the compound yourself? Hell, from it sounds like you know, which is next to nothing, the compound could be a newer design. Companies do that too, use an old mold with a new rubber. Like I said, I've had the tires on ice pack already, and it was fine. And why does "American" matter? Oh my, way, is you location, by chance, Michigan Alcoholics Anonymous? Would certainly explain the attitude.

Christ, it's like kindergarten in here.

Quit with the "my tyre is better than your tyre" stuff. It's irrelevant to the Toyobaru. And if someone says their tyre works in snow, then it probably works in snow.

Sorry, I'm just adding to the pissing contest Max_DC started, though I refrained from posting pictures of, gasp, my car pushing snow around.

As for the Toyobaru, has there been any talk about a DCT/DSG type option?
 
As for the Toyobaru, has there been any talk about a DCT/DSG type option?

Don't think so. I don't think Subaru or Toyota even have one, besides what is used in the LFA. Sounds like one would go against the cars ethos, too.
 
Don't think so. I don't think Subaru or Toyota even have one, besides what is used in the LFA. Sounds like one would go against the cars ethos, too.

The LF-A isn't even DCT/DSG, just an old school SMG setup.

It would be a bit contrary to the ethos, but they do add quite a bit of real world gains. And I think part of me just wants to see them move towards being the standard more often in cars.
 
Why is everyone calling it a toyobaru? I think Subota sounds much cooler.
 
Because you personally tested the compound yourself? Hell, from it sounds like you know, which is next to nothing, the compound could be a newer design. Companies do that too, use an old mold with a new rubber. Like I said, I've had the tires on ice pack already, and it was fine. And why does "American" matter? Oh my, way, is you location, by chance, Michigan Alcoholics Anonymous? Would certainly explain the attitude.
Sure, tested myself. More questions? Attitude here started from random M-drivers trying to generalize their limited thoughts on Subaru. If those altimaxes had decent rubber compound they wouldn't be marginal on ice, so buy smth better next time.

And if someone says their tyre works in snow, then it probably works in snow.
If someone says that about crappy tire, then it undermines their other arguments, I think.
 
Last edited:
Sure, tested myself. More questions? Attitude here started from random M-drivers trying to generalize their limited thoughts on Subaru. If those altimaxes had decent rubber compound they wouldn't be marginal on ice, so buy smth better next time.

You seem to keep forgetting the part where I drove them on ice, last Friday. Attitude started from a guy that use to drive a WRX around and loved Subaru who later ended up buying an M car from the 90's because it was a better value for the money for the performance versus any 2nd hand Subaru. Limited thoughts = first hand experience with several models, along with being in one of the most popular regions in the country for them, yes I guess that is limited.

You've contributed nothing beyond "it is a crappy tire," with no real evidence or claims beyond "I said so." Oh, and insulted Americans and M drivers. You've not provided a supporting point to stand on, nor even a positive point.

Somehow, you're more negative than I am. And less intelligent going about being negative. Which honestly, has be taken a back just a bit.


Why is everyone calling it a toyobaru? I think Subota sounds much cooler.

I want to yell when I say it, SUBOTA. So yes, that is cool. At least 20%
 
Last edited:
Why is everyone calling it a toyobaru? I think Subota sounds much cooler.

Because it reminds me of one of these:

8382164_kubota.jpg


And Google Images brings up this as the third result:

subota_utrosss.jpg
 
Last edited:
To contribute to the argument, AWD and RWD can both be fun in the snow. It just depends on how you have that fun.

My cousin's Wagovan was great fun because we could go barreling through 2-foot drifts, drive through snow halfway up the doors, stop, pull away with ease, and generally just go places that most cars that aren't AWD and equipped with snow tires could ever dream of. More ground clearance than an STi too, and a granny gear. I do recommend a Wagovan to anybody who wants to die laughing when you tow a mud tire-equipped and lifted Cherokee out of a snow-filled ditch with a Civic.

Rear-wheel drive cars are fun in the snow because they're always sideways. No, you can't go offroading through feet of snow, but a rear-drive sports car with snow tires will tackle some pretty healthy conditions. Plus, even when there's just a dusting of snow you can drift to your heart's desire, while AWD cars just kind of go without any drama or excitement.

EDIT: Wagovan also has a 4-wheel handbrake like GT-Rs. No sliding, but rather parking safely on an ice-covered hill.
 
If someone says that about crappy tire, then it undermines their other arguments, I think.

Quit with the "my tyre is better than your tyre" stuff. It's irrelevant to the Toyobaru.

Alternatively you can ignore me and continue being a pillock. The argument is getting undermined a lot more by trying to get the last word in on an irrelevant discussion.

If Azuremen says his M3 works well in the snow with a particular tyre, then it probably works well in the snow with a particular tyre. Since he's him and you're you, chances are his experience is different to yours.

As for the Toyobaru, has there been any talk about a DCT/DSG type option?

Not heard any rumours so far. Normally I'd be quite interested in at least the option of a DCT, but perhaps it's another aspect of the whole basic nature of the car that they've just thrown in a simple six-speed.
 
Minus the aspect of if you are turning, you are giving grip for that turn. If you are doing it well, the front tires are likely using all of their grip for turning.

Now, you can just floor it everywhere, always, and yes it will be a bit easier to drive, but you certainly aren't getting that much traction out of it then if all 4 tires are spinning. Are you?

As for spinning, RWD will spin if you floor it like a tool, where as AWD will try to understeer, then maybe oversteer, and then maybe do some other things. I know this from driving more than a few AWD cars in the snow. They are not as predictable as a 2WD car. That is just a fact from the fact the front or rear wheels can start to slide under throttle.

Ok, what are we talking about here ? If we are talking about dry race track conditions, then I won't start arguing that AWD is faster/better whatever.
But on wet surface and especially snow or gravel a proper, let's call it rally-inspired - AWD has a lot of advantages and will - given the same circumstances ( smiliar power/weight/driving skills ) - have more traction, will be easier to control and therefor be faster.

There is a reason that they started using AWD in rallye racing.

Coming back to daily driving... Your car is limited in snow. Not because it's bad or you suck as a driver but because I have up to 4 points where I can grip and you have two. I can stop at a snowy hill street with 70 % ascent and just drive up the hill again at any speed I want. In a car review of the 2002 WRX the magazine drove the car on a ski slope - uphill.
I don't have to think about " is that pile of snow too high to get out of it again ? " when searching for a parking space or "can I drive on this snowy road before the snow plow truck did ? "
I mean all that limits me is ground clearance - well that is ground clearance + a few inches as seen on my picture ;)
Everything else can be done with that STi and I've experienced it.
You know, when it starts to snow real bad, I grab my STi and take her out for a spin, late at night on country roads. And no matter how bad the conditions, traction has never been an issue. Sometimes even too much traction : If I exit a drift my car gains so much speed that it limits the fun experience sometimes, because - as we agreed on earlier - AWD doesn't help at braking.

A BMW is fun to drive in snow - as long as there is not too much snow and no steep hills. And just for the record I'll repeat it again - I live in BMW country - in my neighborhood 20% of the people work for BMW - 3 series BMW's are the most common car here next to VW Golfs. There is no day I don't meet at least 2 or 3 M3s. So I've seen more than enough 3 series BMW's strugling in snow. I don't know where you live, but we have a lot of winding roads and little hills here and there.

So the 2WD is more predictable you say. It is for those not used to driving AWD. My car never surpised me. You are right, First understeer, then oversteer, tracion all the way. Know it, adapt your driving and you are fast and have fun. You know, my car can recover from almost any drift angle on snow. That is the great thing about it, tons of fun, believe me. It is easier to drift in a 2WD car, but if you are over the edge, it is gone and you spin out.






Cool, I have General Atimax Artics. They tend to be rated higher. I also have an LSD, and some of the best known handling in the world.

Honestly, the whole bit would come down to drivers. And most WRX drivers are honestly clueless, because they AWD bro. They also have zero clue what throttle finesse is.

And have you driven an M car in the snow? It feels good man. Better than a WRX, or any AWD car I've driven in the snow.

I don't know that tire brand to be honest, I guess it's not sold in Germany. All I can say is, that my tire also has to work at 220 km/h on the Autobahn, even in winter and that my tires won most reviews in German car magazines including Sportauto, which is the most respected sports car magazine here : they are here for over 25 years and test their cars on the Nordschleife. Well, and they review tires on sports cars in the dimension I use. Also there is not only snow, but dry, wet and ice condistion . A tire can't be best in all disciplines...anyway if I'm not mistaken the latest version of my tire, Dunlop SP Wintersport 4D won the contest, and the test car was a 3series BMW. So you might consider that tire in future.

Sorry, I'm just adding to the pissing contest Max_DC started, though I refrained from posting pictures of, gasp, my car pushing snow around.

Because all you could show was a picture of your BMW stuck in snow right next to the road ;).
I didn't start a pissing contest. All I said is that I wouldn't consider buying the new Subaru coupe with 200 hp. I never said that it had to have AWD or that 200 hp are not enough in general. Just not for me. Have a look at the last few pages. I may have ( unintended ) triggered this heated discussion, but you jumped on it as a mad dog. Obviously you know a lot of WRX drivers that are either tools or whatever made you have these hard feelings.
And you kind of started to argue that 2WD is better in snow, and sorry man, that's a discussion you already lost before it started so I wonder who's fault that is.
I like many cars, and I really like the inline 6 M3s. So cool down. But saying that people who drive an WRX can't drive, that is, you know, kinda childish and not the level of discussion I prefer. How many WRX drivers do you know ? 20 ? 50 ? All from your region and most of them one social group.
Subaru is the world's largest seller of AWD cars, so I suggest that you stick to rational arguments in future instead of generalizing the driving skills of a handfull of people you know.
 
Maybe i'm the only one that thought it was ironic cause I realize this company doesn't make cars but I thought it was funny how it's almost like Mitsubishi and Subaru put together.

Well, it's actually more like the first six letters of 'Mitsubishi' with an 'a' on the end.
 
It's funny to me that as soon as Azure starts trying to be "less of an ass" he is faced with someone who refuses to use punctuation (among other things) and another who refuses to cite facts. Trial by fire, as they say.
 
Congrats on invalidating what you were just saying.

Wow if that makes you feel like a big dude to correct me whatever. What I meant to say was many of them(bmw drivers) I have met are( cocky). Again the point of what I was saying its its stupid to think all people that drive a certain make of car are going to be a certain way. To be quite Honest I don't think there is a superior auto maker out there at this time some make the argument for Porsche and Ferrari but I don't even think they are either.
 
To be quite Honest I don't think there is a superior auto maker out there at this time some make the argument for Porsche and Ferrari but I don't even think they are either.

I would probably kill myself if Porsche was a superior auto maker. If they were a superior auto maker, they'd make a new design and stray away from the 911. No hate to the 911, I love it, but it's just getting a bit old having seen the same design for the past... god knows how long. Long before I was born.

There really isn't, and won't ever be, a superior auto maker. It's just impossible to be that perfect.
 
It feels like Toyota have revisited the 90's, let's hope they produce more of these sensational looking cars in the future..
 
There's no way they're going to sell them in the same country without hardware differences, eh? These things are badge engineered as bad as GM in the 90s!

I'll still take me a Scion though.
 
Last edited:
How cheap are these again? Because badge twins scream cheap.
 
Back