Senna content coming soon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter strela
  • 5,436 comments
  • 472,673 views
Try to? They're the only things wrong.

Also, the reverse ride height thing doesn't exist.

I'm sorry, but you are dead wrong about this. It very much exists and I have my tunes as proof, also a good part of the tuning community will agree with me on this. Since this isn't the thread for this, I will say no more about it but I will be more than happy to discuss it further with you via pm or in the appropriate thread in the tuning forum.
 
PD got my thanks 5 months ago in the form of my hard earned cash out of my wallet. I don't need to thank them for what they promised me when I bought their product. They should be thanking me for not selling it and taking away a potential new sale because they are failing to deliver on many of their other promises.
Meanwhile you're probably playing GT5 online and not even considering that that's what's probably causing the delay. PD is juggling 3 jobs at once: keeping GT5 servers online, developing content and updates for GT6, and working on GT7. They don't have infinite money.

Besides, if I were developing a game for a fanbase who "loved" it as much as the "fans" here do, I'd say "🤬 it" and spend my resources elsewhere. Clearly most people on this GT fansite would rather the series die than stay with it through this difficult period. At that point it's time to question whether you still count yourself a fan. If not, leave us real fans alone.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Meanwhile you're probably playing GT5 online and not even considering that that's what's probably causing the delay. PD is juggling 3 jobs at once: keeping GT5 servers online, developing content and updates for GT6, and working on GT7. They don't have infinite money.

Besides, if I were developing a game for a fanbase who "loved" it as much as the "fans" here do, I'd say "🤬 it" and spend my resources elsewhere. Clearly most people on this GT fansite would rather the series die than stay with it through this difficult period. At that point it's time to question whether you still count yourself a fan. If not, leave us real fans alone.
So what you're saying is, PD has a business model that can't satisfy it's customers because they are overextended resource wise, and in devloping the game PD should only listen to the non-critical fans?
 
Meanwhile you're probably playing GT5 online and not even considering that that's what's probably causing the delay. PD is juggling 3 jobs at once: keeping GT5 servers online, developing content and updates for GT6, and working on GT7. They don't have infinite money.

Besides, if I were developing a game for a fanbase who "loved" it as much as the "fans" here do, I'd say "🤬 it" and spend my resources elsewhere. Clearly most people on this GT fansite would rather the series die than stay with it through this difficult period. At that point it's time to question whether you still count yourself a fan. If not, leave us real fans alone.
They don't run or look after the servers.
 
Just wondering

In the credit section of GT6 (please look), are cars in Gran Turismo licensed to Polyphony Digital or are they licensed to Sony Computer Entertainment itself?
1386091700632.jpg
 
What does that have to do with the post you are responding to? I never mentioned any specific car did I?
Well this is the Senna thread, and you did quote a post:
No. It's a car in the GT series, therefore we must hate it and lambast PD for screwing it up even though it hasn't come out yet, and even if it ends up actually being pretty nice, we must take it for granted and NOT thank PD for their hard work and respect towards Senna's memory.
Which came from this:
Can't we just wait until the car is in the game before making judgments about it?

Senna thread, directly quoting comments about the one car we are discussing. You can't be talking about anything else.

EDIT - To answer your question, it has everything to do with your post.
 
Last edited:
So what you're saying is, PD has a business model that can't satisfy it's customers because they are overextended resource wise, and in devloping the game PD should only listen to the non-critical fans?
Yes, they're overextended; you got that part right. The other part... not so much. They should listen to people who have good things to say as well as bad, not people who like absolutely nothing about the game and are not willing to admit that there's even one good thing in it. That's not objective criticism. It's just flaming and vitriol and hatred.
 
It's just flaming and vitriol and hatred.
Almost all GT6 discussion has turned into this.

You get some willing to push their displeasure to the point that every thread, no matter the topic, must be filled with a PD lies/broken promises/worst everything ever/can't accept any good points about the game argument.

It begs the question - if they aren't playing the game, if they hate it to the point where uttering the name causes a flood of rage - then why are they hanging constantly around the GT6 threads?
 
Try to? They're the only things wrong.

Also, the reverse ride height thing doesn't exist.
Well, continue on with your thoughts and whatever you seem to think is fine.
I could post a wall of factual truth that they are broken,but I'm sure, given your 14 years of existence,that you would have more time than I to find it for yourself. Carry on. :gtpflag:
 
Well, continue on with your thoughts and whatever you seem to think is fine.
I could post a wall of factual truth that they are broken,but I'm sure, given your 14 years of existence,that you would have more time than I to find it for yourself. Carry on. :gtpflag:
Not the place to talk about it, but I can add you to the PM conversation with the explanation.
 
I'm sorry, but you are dead wrong about this. It very much exists and I have my tunes as proof, also a good part of the tuning community will agree with me on this. Since this isn't the thread for this, I will say no more about it but I will be more than happy to discuss it further with you via pm or in the appropriate thread in the tuning forum.
Cargo,you and I are not smart enough,nor do we tune enough, to know fact from fiction.I find it rather childish,no pun intended, that someone would dispute fact.
 
If only PD didn't make so much promises for GT6, then there wouldn't be any rage towards it and PD, now would there? The one thing I hate more, is being lied to, and PD did excatly that with their false advertisement. Too bad PD will never see how we all feel due to them never visting fourms like other devs. Their so arrogant...
 
If only PD didn't make so much promises for GT6, then there wouldn't be any rage towards it and PD, now would there? The thing I hate more, is being lied to, and PD did excatly that with their false advertisement. Too bad PD will never see how we all feel due to them never visting fourms like other devs. Their so arrogant...
This is what i'm talking about.

The false advertising. Where? Unless you have 100% proof that features will never come in GT6's life span, there's no false advertising. This isn't constructive criticism, it's PD flaming.

I usually try to avoid conversation with 14 year olds. You could try my 16 year old daughter though.
This post shows your immaturity.

The fact that you try and put another member down, and dismiss their claims because of their age, is weak. It's utterly pathetic.

Anyway, this is all off topic rubbish needs to go in their respective threads.

Take the PD flaming to whining and crying thread, and let's keep the Senna discussion here.
 
This is what i'm talking about.

The false advertising. Where? Unless you have 100% proof that features will never come in GT6's life span, there's no false advertising. This isn't constructive criticism, it's PD flaming.


This post shows your immaturity.

The fact that you try and put another member down, and dismiss their claims because of their age, is weak. It's utterly pathetic.

Anyway, this is all off topic rubbish needs to go in their respective threads.

Take the PD flaming to whining and crying thread, and let's keep the Senna discussion here.
Well said...
 
This is what i'm talking about.

The false advertising. Where? Unless you have 100% proof that features will never come in GT6's life span, there's no false advertising. This isn't constructive criticism, it's PD flaming.


This post shows your immaturity.

The fact that you try and put another member down, and dismiss their claims because of their age, is weak. It's utterly pathetic.

Anyway, this is all off topic rubbish needs to go in their respective threads.

Take the PD flaming to whining and crying thread, and let's keep the Senna discussion here.
Really? I've read your post's,you can retract your statement,or I can have some fun.
No I actually DO NOT WANT CONVERSATION WITH A 14 YEAR OLD.
Thanks don't pm me.
 
- ~175-200 new cars is a bit more than "a few"... Plus 7-ish tracks and some preexisting tracks got time/weather treatment
- Adaptive Tessellation happened
- Physics (I.e. Body roll and compression) was obviously revamped
- Lighting reworked
- Large catalogue of visual upgrades

That definitely takes time, considering GT5 took 5 years, only adding ~250 cars and quite a few new/updated tracks, and completely new engine introducing damage and roll-overs, day/night lighting transitions, etc. (all on odd hardware, might I add...) That timeframe seems reasonable.

Not being able to release basic online features found in games since the early 2000s, holding back content that has existed in some form in past iterations, and showing existing content, giving it a timeframe to launch in, only to not fall through and not make any further mention of it is, however, completely unreasonable.

250 cars over 7 years is not a lot in my opinion, especially when they copy and paste a heap of cars.
Sorry, I forgot to mention the physics remodelling :/
And I thought the graphics would have been incorporated with lighting improvements etc.

Having said that, don't think that I'm disappointed with the cars, physics and graphics of the game, I think they are superb. It's the terrible AI system that has barely been updated and the lack of thinking outside the box that frustrates me. We've come up with tonnes of ideas on GTP, of which none have been implemented.
 
Senna content. Talk about it.

Else I wouldn't be surprised if the mods shut this thread down for wandering staggeringly off-topic.
 
About the content, I doubt PD will add any track in the update. No Interlagos, no any other track. It would be a miracle if they did, since GT5 never had free track DLC.
 
Really? I've read your post's,you can retract your statement,or I can have some fun.
No I actually DO NOT WANT CONVERSATION WITH A 14 YEAR OLD.
Thanks don't pm me.
Please don't carry it on... I don't want to take any sides on this. This thread is for discussion on the Senna content.
 
You have got to be without doubt PD's hardest worker
If all people can do is flame PD when some are trying to have a constructive conversation, they aren't fit to have mature discussions.

ME TOO ZOMG IM SHOUTING OF HAPPINESS

*Successful on topic operation
This is going well.

*Restoring happiness and sense to GT6 threads*
 
Back