Sage Staff Emeritus Messages 12,533 United States Messages GTP_Sage Mar 28, 2004 #3 Those platinum buttons are so damn cool! Oh, and, call me an idiot, but I didn't realize NS sprang up from Mosaic...?
Those platinum buttons are so damn cool! Oh, and, call me an idiot, but I didn't realize NS sprang up from Mosaic...?
Nick_Johnston28 Messages 415 Mar 28, 2004 #4 Originally posted by Sage Those platinum buttons are so damn cool! Oh, and, call me an idiot, but I didn't realize NS sprang up from Mosaic...? Click to expand... Idiot.
Originally posted by Sage Those platinum buttons are so damn cool! Oh, and, call me an idiot, but I didn't realize NS sprang up from Mosaic...? Click to expand... Idiot.
The359 Messages 3,804 Macungie, PA Messages The359 Mar 28, 2004 #8 Where would you even find Netscape 0.91 Beta?
Shannon Messages 15,799 Mar 28, 2004 #9 Originally posted by The359 Where would you even find Netscape 0.91 Beta? Click to expand... Mmmm, tastefull erroneous.
Originally posted by The359 Where would you even find Netscape 0.91 Beta? Click to expand... Mmmm, tastefull erroneous.
ALPHA Messages 4,334 Mar 28, 2004 #10 Shannon stole my idea. I was about to butcher his website with an ancient version but he bet me to it Damn, 2.02 doesn't even work. Attachments untitled.gif 31.5 KB · Views: 128
Shannon stole my idea. I was about to butcher his website with an ancient version but he bet me to it Damn, 2.02 doesn't even work.
ALPHA Messages 4,334 Mar 28, 2004 #11 I hate Netscape, it took over control of .html even though it didn't ask like normal programs do.
VIPFREAK (Banned) Messages 8,961 Mar 29, 2004 #15 Originally posted by Rossell Mozilla Firefox is worth getting. Click to expand... I don't like having multiple programs that do the same thing but I have to say I like Firefox too, it's a lot nicer than IE.
Originally posted by Rossell Mozilla Firefox is worth getting. Click to expand... I don't like having multiple programs that do the same thing but I have to say I like Firefox too, it's a lot nicer than IE.
Pupik dig the bolts in my neck Staff Emeritus Messages 19,853 Alabamamania Mar 30, 2004 #16 Kinda funny you mention this, since Netscape celebrates 10 years of browser goodness on April 4th. Where were you in '94? Probably not on the net...
Kinda funny you mention this, since Netscape celebrates 10 years of browser goodness on April 4th. Where were you in '94? Probably not on the net...
Powripper Messages 1,403 Mar 30, 2004 #17 Where were you in '94? Probably not on the net... Click to expand... I was busy watching ninja turtles........
Where were you in '94? Probably not on the net... Click to expand... I was busy watching ninja turtles........
GilesGuthrie Staff Emeritus Messages 11,038 Edinburgh, UK Messages CMDRTheDarkLord Mar 30, 2004 #18 Originally posted by pupik Kinda funny you mention this, since Netscape celebrates 10 years of browser goodness on April 4th. Where were you in '94? Probably not on the net... Click to expand... Pfft. 1994. Some of us designed our first pages for Mosaic 0.51. <table> ? I don't think so!
Originally posted by pupik Kinda funny you mention this, since Netscape celebrates 10 years of browser goodness on April 4th. Where were you in '94? Probably not on the net... Click to expand... Pfft. 1994. Some of us designed our first pages for Mosaic 0.51. <table> ? I don't think so!
Pupik dig the bolts in my neck Staff Emeritus Messages 19,853 Alabamamania Mar 31, 2004 #19 Originally posted by GilesGuthrie Pfft. 1994. Some of us designed our first pages for Mosaic 0.51. <table> ? I don't think so! Click to expand... Yeah, and obsolete tags like <tt> <strong> <address> <paid $50 for a browser> ...that the W3C still tries unsuccessfully to abolish!
Originally posted by GilesGuthrie Pfft. 1994. Some of us designed our first pages for Mosaic 0.51. <table> ? I don't think so! Click to expand... Yeah, and obsolete tags like <tt> <strong> <address> <paid $50 for a browser> ...that the W3C still tries unsuccessfully to abolish!
Sage Staff Emeritus Messages 12,533 United States Messages GTP_Sage Apr 1, 2004 #20 Erm, the W3C has never deprecated <strong>... in fact, if I recall correctly, it might even be in the XHTML 2.0 tag set. [/end snooty post]
Erm, the W3C has never deprecated <strong>... in fact, if I recall correctly, it might even be in the XHTML 2.0 tag set. [/end snooty post]
Pupik dig the bolts in my neck Staff Emeritus Messages 19,853 Alabamamania Apr 2, 2004 #21 Originally posted by Sage Erm, the W3C has never deprecated <strong>... in fact, if I recall correctly, it might even be in the XHTML 2.0 tag set. [/end snooty post] Click to expand... Well, they should. Use <b> instead, it wastes less electrons.
Originally posted by Sage Erm, the W3C has never deprecated <strong>... in fact, if I recall correctly, it might even be in the XHTML 2.0 tag set. [/end snooty post] Click to expand... Well, they should. Use <b> instead, it wastes less electrons.
