I only got to page 7, so forgive me.
I did however put some time/thought into my response.
It's not meant to stir the pot, but I would appreciate any all discussion.
I will not get into a bantering session.
The quotes are not here to point fingers, simply apply my thoughts to what has been discussed thus far.
To me, it doesn’t make sense that a bunch of DR-D drivers should be matched against other DR-D drivers ~ what would the significance of a D rated driver beating other D rated drivers be? Is it the same as an A driver beating another A driver, or would it require a separate calculation?
Look at Dr. not as a driver rating, but as a racing classification... street stock, super stock, stock eliminator, modified, gas, pro...
If you are street stock, is it fun to have a stock eliminator, or, modified run in your class?
Have a look at any sports organization in the world... they will have not only separated classifications based on age group(not getting into that), but also on skill level.
No imagine I'm a decent triathlete (big stretch) at the beginner level in the 50-55 year old age group... I've been progressing to the point I may get get a win... then the organizing body slips in 2 or 3 - 25 year old pro's ... mmm ok... thanks... so much for my opportunity to get a win or 2 and move up to intermediate...
Seems to me like people are willing to accept that they’re not the fastest, but they still want to compete for race wins.
Within their classification, absolutely, but not over all... the FIA races will sort out the serious racers, the rest are amateurs or, sportsman... simply looking to race hard in their class. Think about this, how many Dr.D drivers are getting stuck there because all the points are getting eaten up by Dr.B and above folks jammed into their grid?
I wonder how many would be promoted to C, or B if given the chance to a larger percentage of the points by placing higher in the grid against equal competitors vs placing last, or near last race after race?
Think of how many Dr.D racers would be racing on a regular basis if they had a chance at winning, or, at least getting a podium.
Reference above triathlete scenario.
I think you also have to factor in that DR is based off of both qualifying time, and race results. If it was just split by quali times, I could see how a system could work to match people by quali times, but when race results get out in the mix, it becomes tricky. Someone might be a poor qualifier, but really consistent and clean in races, allowing them to win by more than 10-15 seconds. At the same time, you could have someone in the same race who qualifies well, but races really poorly. Seems to me if you tried to come up with a system where everyone was placed against drivers who both qualify and race at the same level, we’d only ever see a max of 3ish people in each race.
I'm actually all for that too. But then Dr has nothing to do with anything.
At least in this scenario you'd be placed with folks at a competitive pace, which is not the case right now with Dr.A+ being placed with Dr.D folks.
You always have aliens. You always have faster drivers. You always have average drivers. You always have slower drivers. You always have bad drivers.
Those are mostly all put together in a race in sportmode. This seems just like real life so the matchmaking is not that bad based on this notice. I do not think its fair to put all the aliens together. Driving 20th as an alien doesnt make you an alien. I do not think its fair to put all the bad drivers together. Driving 1st as a bad drivers doesnt make you a bad driver anymore. Etc for the rest.
Driving 20th in the aliens only field is no different than being Dr.D in a field of Dr.B and above.
Why should a slow Dr.A+ driver not have to realize he's/she's slow... at Dr.A+??
It's ok for a Dr.D driver to acknowledge they are slow, and suck it up, and have no chance of winning/competing, but it is not ok for a Dr.A+ driver to have no chance of winning?
I don't know that that makes any sense at all in a Dr. classification system at all.
Apply that to a system where Dr. is removed and the race grids are populated on qualification pace alone, and, if "player" is number 20 in the region then, guess what... ?
And, if "player" is winning at Dr.D, "player" will be moved up to Dr.B so that "player" is now placed with racers of similar pace/classification ... and if "player" is placing last at Dr.A+, "player" will be moved back to Dr.A, where "player" will have a chance to be competitive again.
I find it very odd that the A+ drivers want a full grid, with the system the way it currently is.
It's essentially a race of the top 3 now, so, really, what's the great desire to have 17 other cars on track? Especially when it seems the majority of players want lapped cars to ghost... what the heck is the point of the other cars at that point? "Players" are not racing them, and, then, if "players" do come up to lap them "players" still want them to get out of the way(blue flag)/ghost vs racing them.
There is literally no point of having Dr.D/C drivers on the same track as Dr.A+/A drivers. none... other than to bolster appearances.
the use of "player" above is due to, using "you" makes it personal and involves finger pointing, and that is what i am trying to avoid.
Please discuss.