The General Airplane Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crash
  • 2,749 comments
  • 212,043 views
I wonder how many crashes there will be when this behemoth attempts water landings.
 
*** Says 'hi' back to Boeing ***

OK, the fact that it can fly makes it more useful. The Russian thing can't. Nor can it lift high enough to clear other surface traffic.

I still wonder how much ground effect advantage there is if you're going through 15- or 20-foot swells....
 
Which removes the added efficiency of the ground effects design. A rough sea is not a localized object like sea traffic, where it lifts to clear and settles back; it has to just be a giant fuel-hungry airplane, then.
 
Ukrainian_MChS_Mil_Mi-8_Belyakov.jpg




 
Some of my pics from the Victory Parade yesterday.
Mi-8MT (a.k.a. Mi-17, Hip) by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Mi-35 "Crocodile" (Hind-E) & Tu-160 "White Swan" (Blackjack) by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Mi-35 "Crocodile" (Hind-E) by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Ka-52 Alligator attack helicopters by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Mi-28N "Night Hunter" (Havoc) by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Tu-160 "White Swan" (Blackjack) by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Tu-95MS "Bear" by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Tu-160 "White Swan" (Blackjack) by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Il-78 & Su-34 by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Su-30SM (?) by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
Su-27 & MiG-29 by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
MiG-29 & Su-25 - "70" formation by Антон Митрохин, on Flickr
 
wfooshee
I never quite understood the excitement about them, myself.
Click to expand...

At the time of first development, Surface to surface, surface to air, anti-submarine warfare, search and rescue, supply delivery. All would have benefited in certain circumstances from a vessel that could respond at 300mph, and stop on station when it arrived there, whilst carrying a much higher payload than any of the medium range naval bombers. And at the time it looks like it would have been quite a headache for US surface to surface missile systems.

I'm guessing now, but I'm sure in rougher seas it could simply have "anchored up", or perhaps just carried on at a much reduced speed as a turbojet power boat?

Plus...

Just look at it...

791088365851861162.jpg


195msu6s5gizsjpg.jpg
 
MatskiMonk
At the time of first development, Surface to surface, surface to air, anti-submarine warfare, search and rescue, supply delivery. All would have benefited in certain circumstances from a vessel that could respond at 300mph, and stop on station when it arrived there, whilst carrying a much higher payload than any of the medium range naval bombers. And at the time it looks like it would have been quite a headache for US surface to surface missile systems.

I'm guessing now, but I'm sure in rougher seas it could simply have "anchored up", or perhaps just carried on at a much reduced speed as a turbojet power boat?

Plus...

Just look at it...

791088365851861162.jpg


195msu6s5gizsjpg.jpg
Click to expand...
What...in all that's holy is that?! :odd:
 
Oh boy I did it now :lol: As I was shooting some statics, an NH90 came by very low and I had to swap cameras. Just stopped thinking and grabbed for my D300, as I was holding my D90. 404 brain not found. It fell on the lens, which is now broken :irked: It was the 18-105 D90 kit lens so it's not that bad, but a month ago my 120-400 died on me so I was already borrowing a 300mm F4 and waiting for an answer from Sigma.

And I didn't even get a good shot of the NH90 :ouch:
17719596518_58aba2037b_b.jpg


17907436185_2940472f46_b.jpg


F-16 doing a demo, but had problems with the sun. Took a few pics then just watched the show :)
17907430465_030d34f2cf_b.jpg


So this Navy NH90 came in low when I dropped my camera...
17284857774_2938d89b31_b.jpg

As I was shooting the F-16 earlier it was still in A(perture) instead of S(port) mode..

17907916721_a43f01cbaf_b.jpg


17907356065_57f02b127f_b.jpg


17907896651_9305127bb1_b.jpg


17904294382_9b9fd9a52b_b.jpg


17284743224_29dc46f92d_b.jpg


17880897606_845dd63d76_b.jpg

RUN!!!

:D 👍
 
Last edited:
How do aircraft with out tailrotors (Coaxial helicopters like the Kamov KA-series, and tandem-rotor helicopters like the Chinook series) control their yaw?
 
CallmeDan
How do aircraft with out tailrotors (Coaxial helicopters like the Kamov KA-series, and tandem-rotor helicopters like the Chinook series) control their yaw?
Click to expand...
By varying the amount of torque to each rotor assembly. At higher speeds, many coaxial helicopters use actual rudders akin to fixed wing aircraft.
Also, the S-97 gets all of my YES.
 

Latest Posts

Back