On one hand, I can fully understand the wish to remove it. On the other, you just linked to CNN, so I can't take the article as fact. I don't engage in that sort of thing, cos well, I ain't touching it with a barge pole. However, it's been debated back-and-forth about whether it does promote...things, and neither side really seems to be able to negate the other's evidence.
It seems very much like our violence in the media that Western society constantly grapples with. Despite repeated attempts - from outlets like CNN - to claim video games are a direct correlation to violence because this one gunman played Call of Duty is just stupid to us, isn't it? That's like blaming chocolate if you're looking at the numbers of people who play games pretty regularly that include violence. I for one have grown up constantly entrenched in a culture of violent media, yet as a society we're far more accepting of a decapitation on screen than an exposed nipple.
Again, not condoning it, just noting that our viewpoint isn't the most perfectly balanced viewpoint. Let's face it, our own society has a fixation on young women - i.e., 18 - and the constant sexualisation of such. Given that, historically, our own society considered 14 to be an acceptable age back when living that long was a minor achievement, it's an interesting sociological question to ask.
Jeez, I overdid the writing and the words and the things here, didn't I?
