Where did I say anything about Florida? He lost the national popular vote, just like Trump.
Lie. The senate was controlled by Republicans, "elections have consequences" it is their job to approve or disapprove judges.
They did neither. They sat and refused to do their Constitutional duty at all.
The dems only wanted to recount heavenly democrat areas,
An apt typo if I've ever seen one.
the Supreme court shot them down.
Not sure what this has to do with it either.
EDIT: On this front, why don't you respond to
@NotThePrez. He
laid out why your view on this is nonsense.
And Trump flat out won the electoral college.
Not sure what this has to do with it either.
I think you entirely missed my point. My post brought up gerrymandering. Both Bush and Trump lost the popular vote, yet they both got into office anyways. Because the combination of the long-ago unneeded Electoral College and heavy gerrymandering efforts have given the Republicans a built-in advantage. Which makes the ongoing whining of Republicans everywhere that they're persecuted against pretty dumb.
Says you. Citation needed.
Yeah, statements like this are obviously opinions. I don't need to cite anything other than myself. I do feel pretty confident, though, that Trump, McConnell, et al will no be looked upon favorably in future texts.
If you don't see the bias in the media, then I don't know what to tell you. Here is one example to look for. Trump wonders, or speculates about something, and the media always adds the words 'without evidence Trump says...'. The guy can not even speculate without the press jumping all over him.
If Trump doesn't want the media to preface his words with "without evidence," then, and try to stick with me on this one, he ought to stop his nearly daily bloviating on all manner of things without evidence. Fact-checking is only biased against liars.
--
You realize we are in the middle a pandemic, right?
I do. Nowhere in that post did I make any comment on the factors behind the job numbers. Nor did I even make any comment on whether I thought it was valid to knock Trump for those numbers. I quite clearly said that those numbers probably explained Trump's sudden escalation of attacks on Biden. That's it. That's all I said.
So I guess you believe he should not have shut down the country.
When did he shut down the country? Last I looked, we've still got, by far, the world's highest number of cases and deaths, largely due to the hesitation of leadership, both nationally and in many of the currently hardest-hit states, to take the necessary steps to "shut down" in any meaningful sense.
huskeR32 says, "No lockdowns, everyone keep working!"
Wildly missing the mark here.
I don't mean to put words in your mouth, I hate it when it happens to me, but what else do you mean?
I meant what I said. Which at the time of your decidedly misguided response here was nothing more than "I bet Trump started attacking Biden because he's worried about how the job numbers will look." Everything else you responded to was imaginary.
Black swan events are, by nature, unprecedented. This too shall pass.
It could have largely passed a long time ago, with many fewer deaths, if we had any sort of consistent leadership in this country.
--
lmao, it was almost like there were orders to stay at home and businesses closed as such.
Whatever it takes to say orange man bad...
See above. You're trying to have the same imaginary argument that Chrunch is.
