The Last Day Dawns.. of the Last Duper.

  • Thread starter Thread starter valroize
  • 117 comments
  • 8,343 views
The only thing that matters is this.

This is a racing game. It's about how fast you can drive, not how many cars you have. Dupe away, I do...but at the end of the day it's how fast you can drive your cars :gtpflag:
 
I realized as I bought the FGT that paying for these virtual cars is pointless. Gifting myself the same car to avoid having to pay was good. But whatever, I have all the 1 mill + cars anyway and from the looks of things, with online having **** all features, seasonals just a bunch of catch me if you can, doesnt look like I'll be using them on the track that long for HP to diminish.

Photo mode is the way to go now. But it was always nice to help out some of my friends who wanted a fancy painted Miura.
 
Yes.. Yes... you are all right...
As I read in these forums... seems like.../...
Whinge, Whinge, Whinge, Pittiful attempt at justifying cheating, Crying about circumstances, Whinging a little more.../...

My Apologies if this has been discussed b4...
My utmost thanks to those who took the time to read..
I just feel NOT all duping is cheating... IMO.

Doing something that requires you to exploit and overlooked weakness to obtain cars easier IS cheating by definition. End of story...The end or the need does not justify the means. You were cheating. PD stopped it. It was fun while it lasted but no point crying about it.
 
A woman stands in a doorway, dressed in black lingerie.

"come to bed, I'll make it worth your while"

A man sits in a racing frame playing GT5

"In a while, I'm grinding Indy to buy a 908"

This is probably an unrealistic situation as happy grinders probably don't have any female company.
 
A woman stands in a doorway, dressed in black lingerie.

"come to bed, I'll make it worth your while"

A man sits in a racing frame playing GT5

"In a while, I'm grinding Indy to buy a 908"

This is probably an unrealistic situation as happy grinders probably don't have any female company.

hahahahaa thanx 👍
 
The problem with duping cars isn't personal motivation.

It destroy fun for other people to point where this is game breaking.

I feel screwed up when i share car with someone and he dupes it or i "buy" from someone car and he tels me that he have 20 Mazdas in his garage.

If you use your duped car for online your in same league as cheaters from HAlo or Killzone or Cod.

If your using it for you own person it's ok. But ruining orher people gaming is wrong.

I fell happy that PD responded to complain of many people like me to stop this obvious chating.

Sory if removing feature that shouldn't be there and feel moraly wrong is now a bad thing as 50% main page threads are all about, i fell happy for your lose. Realy.
 
A woman stands in a doorway, dressed in black lingerie.

"come to bed, I'll make it worth your while"

A man sits in a racing frame playing GT5

"In a while, I'm grinding Indy to buy a 908"

This is probably an unrealistic situation as happy grinders probably don't have any female company.

I don't find happy grinders more grinder than people that want to have all cars by all means.

Same category diffrent execution.

:edit

uh double post...
 
Personly I used duping when I wanted to have different setups and paint, modding etc, on the same car model. For example I have one GT-R for drag racing, one for high speed tracks, and one for circuit racing. The fact is that a tuned GT-R Spec V costs about 350 000 credits makes it pretty hard to buy three of these. I wished you could sent unlimited cars every day and no value restriction on sending/selling the cars, just like in forza. To be honest, I would exploit the system in that case, duping 20 milion cars, and then send them to my account. Is this cheating, yes maybe, but so what, it is the virtual world, andnobody else takes damage from this.

Should we also consider autogrinding with an x1 as a crime, since you arent racing yourself and using a extreme overpowered car just to get credits? We hacked the system with that one, only using a rubber band and a usb keyboard, does that violate the eula?

As I said before an online auctionhouse would be perfect, welcome to the 2011, gt5 lacks many basic features according to me. And this pokemon level system is even more funny.

Just wait untill the save game can be edited with some kind of savegame editor, for example "add credits", "add exp" etc. And that will happen soon. As far as I know I dont think PD can "see" if you are adding some milions to your account. Then you can just mod the savegame and add 1000 laps on a circuit as historical data. I mean how can you get affected if someone else has about 20 x1? He hasnt stolen them from you, so whats the deal man?
 
Last edited:
The problem with duping cars isn't personal motivation.

It destroy fun for other people to point where this is game breaking.

I feel screwed up when i share car with someone and he dupes it or i "buy" from someone car and he tels me that he have 20 Mazdas in his garage.

If you use your duped car for online your in same league as cheaters from HAlo or Killzone or Cod.

If your using it for you own person it's ok. But ruining orher people gaming is wrong.

I fell happy that PD responded to complain of many people like me to stop this obvious chating.

Sory if removing feature that shouldn't be there and feel moraly wrong is now a bad thing as 50% main page threads are all about, i fell happy for your lose. Realy.

Yawn, I'd like it if they eliminated rubberband grinding and the use of X1 in any A-Spec/B-spec races unless they're specifically X1 races only.

People which too much time on their hands ruin my experience by having more cash and XP.

Yawwwnnnnnn ....
 
So you want 2 copies of the same car. The real life equivalent is printing your own currency, which is illegal.

I would dupe my favourite car, but it's a Mazda Atenza so I'd just buy another one.

And by the way, this game isn't meant to last an hour. You have to work hard for things, which is why PD put a
limit on the value of tradeable cars.

And ahh, back in the REAL WORLD, where cars are touchable, tangible items, I paid for a game. A game that includes every single car and color combination possible, short of stealth cars. And while I'm not an attorney, I did actually read the end-user agreement and as far as I can tell, there is nothing actually illegal about duping cars. None of the cars on the disc are paid for DLC. You bought the game, you bought the cars. End of story. It may not be in the spirit of what PD intended but to draw any parallels between being printing your own money and making extra copies of cars in a video game is just a little silly.

Either way, I run my own business and have worked about 55~60 hours a week for the last 15 years. THAT is hard work. Running A-spec events is NOT hard work. There is nothing even remotely similar between them.

It destroy fun for other people to point where this is game breaking.

I feel screwed up when i share car with someone and he dupes it or i "buy" from someone car and he tels me that he have 20 Mazdas in his garage.

If you use your duped car for online your in same league as cheaters from HAlo or Killzone or Cod.

If you say it destroy your fun, fine. If you say it's in the same league as cheaters from Halo, this is absolutely, completely FALSE. There is no difference between a car that's been copied.

I've said it before. If in the duping process you could suddenly change your car to have extra grip or more power or anything that would give you an advantage, a real ACTUAL advantage online, than I would be the first one to stand up on a soap box, like SO many in this forum, and condemn the practice. But as it stands, it doesn't. It's the same code unlocking the same car on the same disc. You guys really don't get it. The only currency that matters is the money you used to buy the game. You bought the game, you bought the cars. ALL of them. Just use them. If you want to, fine If not, fine. It's a choice. There are just too many people riding in on high horses on GTP.

I duped cars early because for a year before GT5 came out, I had hopes of putting together a real classic car series. Running for 2+ hours online, with no assists, complete with pit stops, tire wear, fuel load considerations, etc. And in January, 15 of my online friends and I did this. And yes, nearly all of us in that group duped pricey classic cars. So what. I bought this game because I thought it was a racing simulator. Not some RPG. That's how I chose to look at it. And unlike the original poster, wo seems overridden by guilt at his decision to dupe a car, I on the other hand am not.
 
Personly I used duping when I wanted to have different setups and paint, modding etc, on the same car model. For example I have one GT-R for drag racing, one for high speed tracks, and one for circuit racing. The fact is that a tuned GT-R Spec V costs about 350 000 credits makes it pretty hard to buy three of these. I wished you could sent unlimited cars every day and no value restriction on sending/selling the cars, just like in forza. To be honest, I would exploit the system in that case, duping 20 milion cars, and then send them to my account. Is this cheating, yes maybe, but so what, it is the virtual world, andnobody else takes damage from this.

Should we also consider autogrinding with an x1 as a crime, since you arent racing yourself and using a extreme overpowered car just to get credits? We hacked the system with that one, only using a rubber band and a usb keyboard, does that violate the eula?

As I said before an online auctionhouse would be perfect, welcome to the 2011, gt5 lacks many basic features according to me. And this pokemon level system is even more funny.

Just wait untill the save game can be edited with some kind of savegame editor, for example "add credits", "add exp" etc. And that will happen soon. As far as I know I dont think PD can "see" if you are adding some milions to your account. Then you can just mod the savegame and add 1000 laps on a circuit as historical data. I mean how can you get affected if someone else has about 20 x1? He hasnt stolen them from you, so whats the deal man?

If he keep all X1 for himself i'm ok with that. Problem comes when he is trying to sell them to oher people.

X1 and other 20mln cars should be rare cars that's why those cars are so pricy .
And then when i want trade some cars i enter a lobby i had same 20 mln cars one i bought and 1 i won. I think i could trade this for nice LM car or other 20 Mln car.

As i enter there is a dude who has few X1, about 20 Mazda787b ant other rare cars and he want to trade them for bunch of no name cars for his collection.

My 20 mln hard earned car worth a ***t now because some dude is duping cars.

That is game braking, it ruins economy of internet trade.

Are still trying to say duping overall is ok ? It's not and it shudn't be posible in first place.

In my opinion cars should be 100x more hard to get. UCD should have like 5-6 cars each day , and duping shouldn't be possible.

That would create really good economic system.

Economic system in GT5 is that state because of duping. Hyperinflation of rare cars killed it.

Keep duping out of online.
 
Jokes on you because you can win the 330 P4 from golding a race. I can't remember which - but that's how I got mine.

Errm, no, there's no event that wins you a 330 P4.

That is game braking, it ruins economy of internet trade.
Internet trade is and was never a part of GT5. So no, it does not break the game in anyway.

Oh, the drama!

(At the OP, by the way.)
Indeed, people (including myself) had fun exploiting this glitch, now it's over, deal with it.
 
If you say it destroy your fun, fine. If you say it's in the same league as cheaters from Halo, this is absolutely, completely FALSE. There is no difference between a car that's been copied.

I've said it before. If in the duping process you could suddenly change your car to have extra grip or more power or anything that would give you an advantage, a real ACTUAL advantage online, than I would be the first one to stand up on a soap box, like SO many in this forum, and condemn the practice. But as it stands, it doesn't. It's the same code unlocking the same car on the same disc. You guys really don't get it. The only currency that matters is the money you used to buy the game. You bought the game, you bought the cars. ALL of them. Just use them. If you want to, fine If not, fine. It's a choice. There are just too many people riding in on high horses on GTP.

I duped cars early because for a year before GT5 came out, I had hopes of putting together a real classic car series. Running for 2+ hours online, with no assists, complete with pit stops, tire wear, fuel load considerations, etc. And in January, 15 of my online friends and I did this. And yes, nearly all of us in that group duped pricey classic cars. So what. I bought this game because I thought it was a racing simulator. Not some RPG. That's how I chose to look at it. And unlike the original poster, wo seems overridden by guilt at his decision to dupe a car, I on the other hand am not.

If you use duping for your own reasons as stated in quote it is ok for me. The problem is when you will try to sell those duped cars. Ofcourze if you will try sell them in first place.

And that "Selling duped cars to other people" is considered cheating. Because someone need to put hard work in game to obtain something and other in no time get 20 coppies of that. And you hard worked Zagato mean nothing now and should be as PD planed. In summary someone is ruining your experience.
Same as someone cheating in Cod ruining your experience.

Cheating is cheating. If it is Aimbot or trainers for cash or trainers for experience or editeed save file it is cheating and duping cars is no diffrent.

You use it for You and your frends only it's fine and keep it that way.

Trying to sell someone who you don't know duped car is like playing CS with aimbot. It's cool to use it in friends lobby if everybody use it or knows about it and accept it. Using otherways is wrong.
 
Can someone tell me the reason Polyphony Digital didn't incorporate a duplication command within the game menus?


💡

The same reason that didn't include a proper GT Auto shop, Leaderboards, PP, decent smoke shaders, etc. They didn't anticipate what people would want and they didn't anticipate that people would want to collect every car by trading instead of grinding.
 
tribolik
Ok I lied Ive been playing GT5 1 hour each 15 days (thats about how much time it takes to get them done)...

thank you PD for the 20 extra races you gave us but Im still waiting for the 400 events that GT5 comes short from GT4

No way, Ferrari f1 event is 5 races of at least 15min EACH. Granted I'd prefer new every week but with this and online racing it keeps me plenty busy (highly recommend joining some type of weekly league because it will give you cars to try out and tweak/tune each week)..
 
If you use duping for your own reasons as stated in quote it is ok for me. The problem is when you will try to sell those duped cars. Ofcourze if you will try sell them in first place.

And that "Selling duped cars to other people" is considered cheating. Because someone need to put hard work in game to obtain something and other in no time get 20 coppies of that. And you hard worked Zagato mean nothing now and should be as PD planed. In summary someone is ruining your experience.
Same as someone cheating in Cod ruining your experience.

Cheating is cheating. If it is Aimbot or trainers for cash or trainers for experience or editeed save file it is cheating and duping cars is no diffrent.

You use it for You and your frends only it's fine and keep it that way.

Trying to sell someone who you don't know duped car is like playing CS with aimbot. It's cool to use it in friends lobby if everybody use it or knows about it and accept it. Using otherways is wrong.

To be very blunt about it, I never 'traded' cars with others. At least not openly. But in the 'group' of about 35~40 people I regularly run with, we gave them away freely. Openly. Without question. We didn't trade. If somebody wanted a specific car we all pooled our resources and looked for what they wanted and just gave it away. And I think that was more in the spirit in which PD intended. Although their concept was not to make an extra copy for yourself of course, which we all did. But all of us who took part, weren't really that interested in the A-spec/career mode of this game. And I think that's the big difference. We wanted these cars because we wanted to race each other using these cars. I've never liked or appreciated the whole 'earning credits' end of it. If there was an option to unlock all cars from the beginning I would have done so.

One of the biggest issues people have is complaining about kids in X1s ruining the experience of online lobbies. But to me this makes no sense. (1) There's no way to know for sure how they obtained the car--they're just assuming they're duped. (2) And more importantly, there is nothing stopping anybody who bought the game, using B-spec only to reach level 35, getting an X1 and then using it in an online lobby, having NEVER driven the car before. To me, B-spec, and the fact that you can WIN so many prized cars for basically doing nothing, is a much bigger travesty. I find people who complain about duping but don't have an issue with rubber band grinding or b-spec credit earning, to be hypocrites. And yet people defend it just because "it's what PD wanted" (3) There is nothing stopping anybody from buying the game, playing it for the first time, buying an MX-5 with their 20,000 start up credits, joining an online lobby and causing havoc.

What I think would have made much more sense would be to lock the (public) online mode until you have at LEAST completed the license tests with bronze. And then color code other lobbies with Silver and Gold. If you want to join a Silver lobby, you have to have completed with Silver. As an example. Perhaps not a good one because I think at least some of the license tests themselves are a bit flawed and don't really teach you proper racing techniques. In fact, I think the 'start from the back and pass 15 cars in 1-3 lap' scenario is what's partly responsible for the lack of proper driving etiquette to begin with. And I've seen this in public lobbies over a variety of racing games for years. It's a battlefield out there. And I can only laugh when people on this board try to make a connection between duping cars and lack of driving skill.

Perkel, I understand where you're coming from. But one thing you have to appreciate is the fact that a 'trading community' is not something PD ever intended with this game. It was set up as a 'gifting' option and not as a trade. This is what the community turned it into. I think in this PD were a bit naive. And now they've got a big mess on their hands. They have some people (a) sim racing enthusiasts like myself, who dupe cars because they could care less about racing off-line with a bunch of hapless AI (b) car enthusiasts who don't necessarily want a race but there isn't another game out there that offers 1000+ cars and they just want to collect the cars (b) traders who started their own sub-culture with this game by trading cars back and forth and (c) the staunch, traditional off-line, GT enthusiasts who are so irked by the idea of duping that smoke comes out of their nostrils. And at this point, the community is kind of fractured. I think under the circumstances, I can't really blame PD for what they did. Although I still believe the reason they're halting the >1,000,000 gifting has nothing to do with duping but because of (1) potential conflicts ahead with paid for DLC (2) the fact that people are selling cars on ebay. Again, I'm no legal expert but these people are selling something intangible. By purchasing the game, you've already entered into an agreement to have access to those cars. I know this is a foreign concept for many people on this board because they really think they're 'earning' the cars by 'earning' credits. But outside the game, back in the real world where there are real laws and real courts and real lawsuits, those ebay sellers are selling something that they have no ownership rights to. And PD, Sony and their lawyers see a potential issue. But, that's just my opinion.

In a sense, I agree, it's kind of a shame that the 'trade community' was ruined by duping. But it was a tower people tried to build in a swamp, during an earthquake. If you understand my meaning.
 
........ And while I'm not an attorney, I did actually read the end-user agreement and as far as I can tell, there is nothing actually illegal about duping cars. None of the cars on the disc are paid for DLC. You bought the game, you bought the cars. End of story. ..........

You apparently didn't read it well as section 1 talks about how people should only have 1 PSN, as well as not using fake info to create a PSN. There are also sections in them talking about exploiting flaws in the programming.

No It doesn't specifically talk about duping, because its a general agreement for all software titles and duping is exploiting a flaw. But don't try to justify yourself by saying the agreement doesn't specifically mention it when it actually does, just in a more general way to cover all software titles.
 
Most of the autogrinders or the elitists or people with 1337 skillz probably got their X1 from someone who duped it. And they're crying about duping.
 
Why you not did the birthday glitch?

Play the game in the way you want, its your game, you paid for it, enjoy it, that the purpose of it.
 
You apparently didn't read it well as section 1 talks about how people should only have 1 PSN, as well as not using fake info to create a PSN. There are also sections in them talking about exploiting flaws in the programming.

No It doesn't specifically talk about duping, because its a general agreement for all software titles and duping is exploiting a flaw. But don't try to justify yourself by saying the agreement doesn't specifically mention it when it actually does, just in a more general way to cover all software titles.

You're confusing the end user agreement of the game with Sony's end user agreement for creating an account on the PSN network. And even in this you're not completely correct. I can just as easily create an account for my wife, my daughter, my cousin, etc, using CORRECT information and it's perfectly legal.

EDIT: In fact, I'll go a step further. While the software, the game that you're running is not really yours (you own the disc and own a LICENSE to use the code), the GAME SAVE that one copies in order to duplicate cars IS the one thing that you could technically claim as ownership property. So in that sense, so long as the game save is not copy protected, there REALLY is nothing illegal about the process. If you believe otherwise, I'd like to see you try and argue it out in a court of law.
 
If he keep all X1 for himself i'm ok with that. Problem comes when he is trying to sell them to oher people.

X1 and other 20mln cars should be rare cars that's why those cars are so pricy .
And then when i want trade some cars i enter a lobby i had same 20 mln cars one i bought and 1 i won. I think i could trade this for nice LM car or other 20 Mln car.

As i enter there is a dude who has few X1, about 20 Mazda787b ant other rare cars and he want to trade them for bunch of no name cars for his collection.

My 20 mln hard earned car worth a ***t now because some dude is duping cars.

That is game braking, it ruins economy of internet trade.

Are still trying to say duping overall is ok ? It's not and it shudn't be posible in first place.

In my opinion cars should be 100x more hard to get. UCD should have like 5-6 cars each day , and duping shouldn't be possible.

That would create really good economic system.

Economic system in GT5 is that state because of duping. Hyperinflation of rare cars killed it.

Keep duping out of online.

Dude, your "20min" car was worth s**t the second anyone was able to reach L35 in B-spec - a feat, I might add, that requires one to do NO racing whatsoever.

Some of you people are attaching a false "value" to cars in a game that actually have no value other than what you're willing to give for them. You worked your butt off to bronze the Vettel challenges? Great, good for you. I got the car by having Bob grind out races while I slept.
 
...
(1) potential conflicts ahead with paid for DLC (2) the fact that people are selling cars on ebay. Again, I'm no legal expert but these people are selling something intangible. By purchasing the game, you've already entered into an agreement to have access to those cars. I know this is a foreign concept for many people on this board because they really think they're 'earning' the cars by 'earning' credits. But outside the game, back in the real world where there are real laws and real courts and real lawsuits, those ebay sellers are selling something that they have no ownership rights to. And PD, Sony and their lawyers see a potential issue. But, that's just my opinion.
...

Very well written post.

Aren't the chromeline and stealth cars locked to the account? So banning gifting because of DLC cars is not probable.

I don't want to defend the stupid e-bay people but strictly speaking, what if they are charging for their 'services' (read duping or B-Spec grinding or Rubberband grinding). This is like saying that all the money from sale of a game or DLC goes directly to the developer/programmer. There are middle men in between like publishers and retailers who get quite a significant chunk of that money. What if these ebay people count themselves as 'publishers' or 'retailers'? Again, I'm not defending them but since there's all this lawyerspeak flying around I thought I'd give it a go at being all legal. :)
 
Back