- 17
- New Mexico, USA
- mini_mii550
Why was Top Gear removed in GT6 and will it make a return?
It's purely a licensing issue. GT5 was the first game to incorporate the TGTT, but then when the publishers of Forza (I've forgot who it is :S) saw it was a success, they threw lots and lots of money at the BBC to get the exclusive license. To be fair, they did a better job with the whole Top Gear thing than PD did, but it's not really PD's choice that it was removed.
There were many things left out from 5 that never made it to six...It's purely a licensing issue. GT5 was the first game to incorporate the TGTT, but then when the publishers of Forza (I've forgot who it is :S) saw it was a success, they threw lots and lots of money at the BBC to get the exclusive license. To be fair, they did a better job with the whole Top Gear thing than PD did, but it's not really PD's choice that it was removed.
I agree, I enjoyed a lot in this track. I have been in several online races on GT5 for trading. As Top Gear Track isn't here, GT6 isn't the sameYeah I really enjoyed this track, shuffle races were really fun on this track to. Bring both back please.
Forza has the rights to Top Gear. PD would have to buy them again.I agree, I enjoyed a lot in this track. I have been in several online races on GT5 for trading. As Top Gear Track isn't here, GT6 isn't the same
Bring the track, please!
Well, if Forza has the rights to Top Gear, then PD will have to wait when the contract between Forza and Top Gear expires...Forza has the rights to Top Gear. PD would have to buy them again.
How ironic, Forza exists as an alternative to GT for people who own XBOXs. I's like Kaz's ideas grew a life of their own and then robbed him.Top gear went Whit the competition (forza) so I don't think we will seeing top gear back any time soon
Why are you speaking in a matter of fact way when you have no proof any of that is true?
There were many things left out from 5 that never made it to six... you show no valid sources to back up your points of thin air..
Top Gear was a gimmicky addon and PD did a terrible job of implementing it, so I'm happy to see it go. Sorry no like from me, I think PD have far more important issues on their plate for GT7
"Looks"It looks to be exclusive
"Looks"
Not
"It is"
There, once again, is no evidence to be an exclusive event. T10 threw money at them [BBC] and T10 threw money out for sponsorship of the track for their game. They pulled in money, and returned their investments.
Nothing else to say...
Did you read the article?
If you did and you still think it's not an exclusive deal, then you have more optimism than I.
I call it reading into what is being said...
PD only cared about the track, and T10 won them over with brand implementation.
You seem to be so focused on evidence
go find me some facts that say it isn't exclusive!
It doesn't work like that. The burden of proof is on you.Did you read the article? If you did and you still think it's not an exclusive deal, then you have more optimism than I.
Now I'm not saying it's exclusive for all eternity, I'm saying it's exclusive for a specified period of time. And just because neither party has divulged such information doesn't mean it for surely is not true. I call it reading into what is being said...and what is being said is that PD only cared about the track, and T10 won them over with brand implementation.
You seem to be so focused on evidence, then go find me some facts that say it isn't exclusive!
In fact they cared a little more but was a bad time for them to implement anything TG related. There was the real Stig polemic involving a court case, the game delays (years from the announcement) meaning possible license expires, and finally the suspicious time coinciding Top Gear and Jeremy Clarkson new Forza partnership starting with FM3 and followed by FM4 and FM5.Did you read the article? If you did and you still think it's not an exclusive deal, then you have more optimism than I.
Now I'm not saying it's exclusive for all eternity, I'm saying it's exclusive for a specified period of time. And just because neither party has divulged such information doesn't mean it for surely is not true. I call it reading into what is being said...and what is being said is that PD only cared about the track, and T10 won them over with brand implementation.
You seem to be so focused on evidence, then go find me some facts that say it isn't exclusive!
It doesn't work like that. The burden of proof is on you.
.....
My guess on it? It was up for auction. BBC saw T10 and after the work from PD wanted to try something else. It was probably an auction for PD (which T10 most likely said to BBC set a price for us to beat/match) that they couldn't beat/match so it was left out.
Now I don't know about you, but I damn well know the BBC won't publish an article about themselves for price gouging a market/product...
No mate, it's your job to prove your exclusive theory.It's actually on you to make your case to me
No. The price probably was too far fetched for PD/Sony to pay for. T10/Microsoft would easily dump money on something they saw they thought they could take a hold of to make more money. That's just how business/Americans think.So if it's up for auction wouldn't that mean its exclusive?
That's what we are asking to be found/proved that it is in fact exclusive.I'm saying its in forza and not in gt6 for the reason of an exclusive licensing agreement.
All I'm saying is, you don't tell people that alchemy really does make lead into gold without proof. You don't just say that it is for a fact an exclusive deal.And like you mentioned, no you don't see doctoral dissertations written on a hunch, but this is a video game forum, instead of berating each other's ideas we can constructively find some common points and work from there. Correct?