I know this is a little late, but did anyone happen to catch the final two races of the ETCC season from Pergusa?
Pretty massive shunt on lap 1 of the first race.
This was the first time I've ever watched an event at Pergusa, and wow is it ever an amazing trackFast, scary walls, and beautiful scenery...what else could you ask for! It would be sick to see some faster cars here, either WTCC, or in a dream world, V8 Supercars
![]()
Cool thanks, I'll have to check that out 👍(Italian) V8 Superstars raced there... it's a great track, I think the 2012 race was pretty eventful, might be one to watch.
What's to dislike???The circumstances were bizarre, so race one was quite enjoyable. I still really dislike Pergusa though.
There's something about where it's situated that makes it look really... primitive. The layout is fine, it just feels like it's stuck in the early 1960s.What's to dislike???
I would say picturesque instead of primative, but each to their own I guessThere's something about where it's situated that makes it look really... primitive. The layout is fine, it just feels like it's stuck in the early 1960s.
There's something about where it's situated that makes it look really... primitive. The layout is fine, it just feels like it's stuck in the early 1960s.
Ya that was some 🤬 🤬! Race 1 was its usual boring self. Race 2 had some pretty good racing, lots of paint rubbing...and Seb was closing on the lead very quickly. We definitely got robbed of a last lap scrap for 1st![]()
Which actually took them until the next morning to decide upon, even though the ride height checks are conducted virtually immediately post-race.Stewards decided that one post race anyhow, when Tiago was excluded for ride height infringement. This also means Loeb is infront of Muller in the championship now.
That does sound a little odd. What would be the motivation for the fishiness?Which actually took them until the next morning to decide upon, even though the ride height checks are conducted virtually immediately post-race.
Not fishy in the slightest. /s
Citroen, as always. They're still massively biased towards them in everything they do.That does sound a little odd. What would be the motivation for the fishiness?
Damn, that sucksCitroen, as always. They're still massively biased towards them in everything they do.
Citroën have said that they will leave the WTCC or the WRC at the end of 2016.
They obviously did it for a good reason but as a Touring Car fan I just think that whilst they were deadly serious about the WTCC, a small part of me just thinks they just used the WTCC as a basis to test to develop a car they really intend to use in the WRC. I am sure I am wrong. But that is just how it appears.
http://www.touringcartimes.com/2015/11/19/citroen-to-end-its-wtcc-programme-at-the-end-of-2016/
I wouldn't say they did it for a good reason they made the FIA change the rules just for them which then put a MASSIVE cost on every other team.
The C-Elysse is too big for rallying, and the DS3 is one of the most successful rally cars of all time. It makes no sense to use it - a short wheelbase is what you want in rallying - as the DS3 will still be able to compete under the new WRC regulations; it just needs some upgrades.They obviously did it for a good reason but as a Touring Car fan I just think that whilst they were deadly serious about the WTCC, a small part of me just thinks they just used the WTCC as a basis to test to develop a car they really intend to use in the WRC.
*engineThe C-Elysse is too big for rallying, and the DS3 is one of the most successful rally cars of all time. It makes no sense to use it - a short wheelbase is what you want in rallying - as the DS3 will still be able to compete under the new WRC regulations; it just needs some upgrades.
No thanks we don't need them ruining BTCC like they have with WTCC and WRC.*engine
I think Citroen would do better with a significantly less funded BTCC program and still have the budget to win.
Combined with the WRC effort.