Yup, when I read the pricing when it first came out I thought there had been a printing mistake. The iQ cost just £50 less than my 500. Even then, my 500 isn't the basic model either, it's the Lounge with all the nifty extra bits.
Which is probably why I've seen 2 iQs since release but countless Yaris'.
I know, the price per square inch for the iQ is a bit of a joke. It's a nice enough car but you're really paying a premium for a bit of city chic.
Actually it sort of wouldn't. If you specced a 3dr Aygo to the same level as the iQ (alloys, electric windows, aircon) it'd be £9,995 - exactly the same price as the iQ. So provided you want a small car with a reasonable number of toys (like moi), the iQ does start to make sense.
Really? I've not tried seeing what an Aygo would cost if you specced it up, but then it sort of goes against the point of it being a cheap'n'cheerful if you did so.
And even if they were matched on price, the Aygo performs better, weighs less, has more space, and doesn't have a ridiculous second gear that takes you to about 70mph. I'm pretty sure the iQ's daft gearing is the only reason it's quoted fuel consumption is better - and to me, having a massively long box of gears sort of defeats the purpose in a city car.
Though I'd still opt for the Aygo. Well actually I'd get a C1, but that's besides the point.
Well, ditto. The same car for less money? I'm surprised Toyota sells any Aygos
at all.
As would mine were Smart to sort out the hideously awful gearbox.
I've not driven a Smart yet but I don't see myself being
too bothered by the 'box. There are enough owners who don't seem to mind. I suppose it depends what you want from a car.
Incidentally, I intend to drive a Smart and iQ very soon, now that my car works again and I can make it to dealerships in the area.