Traffic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nevsky
  • 102 comments
  • 5,327 views
the only traffic i want in GT is in Photo Mode when they have the nice setting with cars all around and blury lights. kewl :dopey:

p.s. ^^ kewl idea about the auto baun! they should have done that insted of vegas. or both
 
Nevsky
GT series doesn't have autocross, which is a huge part of amateur racing. Having a city with traffic would be no different then having an autocross course, but if i suggested autocross I wouldn't get any negative comments.

Okay... I know it's only a week into the new year, but this right here has the potential to be one of the worst quotes of the year. You literally have to be minus a proper brain to consider street racing and autocrossing on anything approaching the same level.
 
Could be interesting to drive on the ring in the real conditions, with bikes and cars to overtake and finding other interesting cars to drive behind to se how they do...

At the same time I'd like driving on open road, the same way of the old need for speed, with real famous road, for example the Targa Florio, the Stelvio...with the phisics engine of GT4.

No city please.
 
Okay... I know it's only a week into the new year, but this right here has the potential to be one of the worst quotes of the year. You literally have to be minus a proper brain to consider street racing and autocrossing on anything approaching the same level.

I agree, if people are seeing "public traffic" as "autocross cars" then they need help :sick: ......no racing on open roads.....full stop!
 
Why don't you just buy GTA stop filling up space with ideas that are totally backward to what GT stands for! These really needs a lock.

BTW: sorry I'm in a bad mood.
 
i'm not saying i want to have it in the game, which is nearly impossible, considering the game modes and other stuff, but with the graphics and physic engine of GT4
 
To the original poster, apparently GT on the PS2 with its current levels of both physical and visual realism is still only capable of simulating 6 cars at a time, not the number needed to simulate a city full of traffic (as in Driver, GTA, etc.) with the kind of accuracy we have come to expect from the GT name. However I agree it would be a nice thing to have one day, and hope the PS3 makes it possible and they don't use all that extra power simply to make the game look better like they're doing with GT3 and 4.

To those who feel street racing is immature and irresponsible and has no place in a serious simulation, I agree it is a dangerous and illegal thing to do in real life. But isn't one of the fun things about a computer simulation the ability to safely try things out that are too dangerous, expensive, or illegal to do in real life? My girlfriend will never let me learn to fly a single-engine airplane for real, even if I could afford to, however I get many hours of enjoyment from Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004, which does simulate a realistic amount of air traffic, and you can choose to either practice proper real-world flying procedures, or just play around for fun weaving around between buildings, etc. Regardless of what happened on 9/11/01, there is still a large number of people in the world such as myself who are mature enough to know the difference between fantasy and reality, and never try crazy stuff in real life, whether it's with cars or with airplanes. So please don't ruin the fun for us.

Those of you who say Gran Turismo only simulates the world of "professional" racing, that couldn't be farther from the truth. It has always been rooted in the idea of starting out with ordinary "street" cars like Honda Civics which you commonly see people driving in real life, and eventually paying to modify them to make them faster. It has expanded the number of real "race" cars included since then, as well as exotic sports cars like RUF and Cizeta, but it is not strictly a "professional racing simulation." For people who want those, there are already tons of simulations available that focus on NASCAR or Formula 1, etc. But Gran Turismo has been and always will be "The Real Driving Simulator" and hopefully will continue to gradually expand to cover all the fun things you can do with real cars in real life.

As for Need For Speed, it (the first one, which carried the logo of Road & Track Magazine) used to be a relatively serious and realistic simulation, yet it still simulated traffic and cop chases. In fact, on the back of the box it said something like "The cars drive like they should, so you can drive them like you shouldn't." But with most of the newer versions since, it has become more arcadey and silly and missing many of the features and options which I liked about the original, and I haven't even bought the most recent version. The first Midtown Madness also seemed promising, but the graphics are now seriously out of date, and the sequel did not have as good a physics engine. Grand Theft Auto 3 and Vice City are very nice looking and still have a semi-believable physics model, but still not as detailed as Gran Turismo and the car models are all pretty much "fake" cars. I haven't had a chance to try the Burnout series.

Finally, for those who mentioned autocross, that is something I have thought would be a good idea for a long time, and it would appear to have finally been included in GT4 as the "Gymkhana" event, although I haven't heard from anyone who's actually tried it yet. So those of you who are lucky enough to have GT4 already, please let us know what it's like.
 
I'd also like to know what this "Gymkhana" event is. I've been to a few auto-crosses in my life (my brother races in them every once in awhile and its alot of fun. So I would be very excited to see auto-cross in GT4.
 
want highway racing....try Tokyo Xtreme Racer Zero & Shutokou Battle Zero One... both games are developed by Genki...and its way better than EA's NFS: underground...
 
wulfar
want highway racing....try Tokyo Xtreme Racer Zero & Shutokou Battle Zero One... both games are developed by Genki...and its way better than EA's NFS: underground...

agree. (and don't forget tokyo extreme racer 3 and Need for speed 4: High Stakes)
 
Homer_SS
Uhh isnt Autocross an OFFICIAL event in a CLOSED COURSE???
Or is this only in my universe?????



All the Auto-Crossing I have been to is yes. They drive around cones and try to see how fast they can do it. The ones I have been to didn't have any Prizes or real competion, you just went for fun to see how fast you could get your car around a tight technical track.
 
You guys are coming down on this guy a bit heavy don’t ya think, granted that street racing is illegal and dangerous not only for the drivers of the cars racing but also the traffic too, but allot of people love drifting and didn’t this start as an illegal act of the back roads of Japan, don’t get me wrong I hate people that speed up and down roads like a bunch of morons but don’t come down on a guy because of an idea.

Back on topic:

I wouldn’t like this if it did enter the GT series, because this is what its about. I know because of the NOS introduction that it looks like its heading that way but it isn’t, if you want to get thrills from racing though traffic then play Burnout 3 it by far better that NFSU1 or 2.
 
IMO 'Street Racing' is one of the most immature thing's to do in a car. But in a game it can be quite fun since you can't kill yourself.

On topic: The GT series was never meant to be about Street Racing and it never will.
 
:ouch:

Gran Turismo does NOT support illegal activity. Starting with a "street car" has nothing to do with "street racing." Have you ever heard of SCCA? Many members run tuned-up "street cars" around a race track. This is considered a professional racing atmosphere.

Street racing is fun only to the driver, in his/her own sick and stupid little mind. Street racing is cool in theory, or on a scripted TV show, or in a game, where no one can get hurt. FPS' are the same. Shooting people in a game is cool, but you don't need to go around shooting people in real life.

Gran Turismo has always been about legal racing and driving conditions. If you play GT, you're always on a track of some sort - be it a professional motor speedway or a series of closed-off roads. Street racing is stupid, and has no place in the game. If the closed off road courses like Tokyo R246 aren't enough, go whine to Genki or EA that TXR or NFSU need better physics. Don't ruin a masterpiece.

It's an objective opinion, but given what I've read in response so far to the first post, it's shared by many.
 
oh i forgot to mention in my previous reply that i cant and i will never compare Genki's Tokyo Xtreme Racer or EA's NFS: underground with GranTurismo....coz they are totally different, its like comparing go-karts with F1 cars....and dont forget that GranTurismo is actually a simulation rather than a boring -Too fast, too furious styled- game.

also anybody can easily win in games such as TXR and NFS, while GT actually needs skills.

and yeah as TEN said street racing is only cool in games and TV shows...other than that it is only sick, stupid and sucidial for one to really preform it in real life.

and finally one last advice to all the street racer in the world....
If you think driving your powerful car makes you a skilled driver, try racing a pro on the tracks...im 100% sure that you will lose....its not all about power.
 
Physics
I've never heard of anyone trying to make traffic racing an illegal sport. Those people in Russia are retarded.

totally uncalled for :( i think you are taking this a bit too seriously i would want a street racing game with the seriousness and quality of GT i mean hey IT'll ONLY BE A GAME.
i don’t support street racing i think its a really dumb thing to do but if they ain't got respect for they're own lives or others then they get what they deserve, i mean everyone can make up they're own mind if they want to race illegally then there is nothing you or me can do about it.
so all of you just take a chill pill there is no need for remarks "Physics" like that if you don't like the idea blank it forget its even there,there are admins/mods in this forum if they think he is creating a propaganda then they’ll lock it simple
just my opinion
 
Nevsky
There were threads about this before, but the discussion didn't fully end.

As bad as this may sound I think I would want GT games to have driving in the city especially the traffic. With real physics engine, and no arcadey stuff tolerance. It would need large cities, perhaps real ones. If i do it in real live then why not do it in a good nonarcade game. In some countries street racing is not racing in a straight line on an empty road, but seeing who is faster in traffic.




See this race in Russia during traffic: http://members.home.nl/nica23/P1010001.MOV

If we can drive like this in the game and love it even more.


Street COURSES: 👍 👍 👍
Street RACING: 👎 👎 👎

I love street courses as much as anyone, R246, R5, R11 etc.. great courses.. I love the street hybrid courses... but having traffic is an unnecessary feature. I know it's fun trying to avoid cars on tracks whilst driving at high speed and in some degree it is extremely entertaining. The best game for this kind of thing is the original Need for Speed... some of those great windy twisty tracks they had which were point to point.. absolutely loved that. I would love a course through London to appear in GT4.. as I live there it would be nice to see all the landmarks... plus we have plenty of places where the roads linkup nicely to form somewhat of a track already.

Anyway... I don't think we'll see additional random AI cars driving around to obstruct us in future games... but I wouldn't mind seeing more street based courses.
 
Ubiquitous
Anyway... I don't think we'll see additional random AI cars driving around to obstruct us in future games... but I wouldn't mind seeing more street based courses.

its never gonna happen i never want it to. i would love to see a track in london though as i live here as well
 
An interesting concept, indeed, but as mentioned many times before, let EA or Genki do it. The GT series is puritan one. The best sumnation of my ideas can be found in this quote:

Ubiquitous
Street COURSES: 👍 👍 👍
Street RACING: 👎 👎 👎

I love street courses as much as anyone, R246, R5, R11 etc.. great courses.. I love the street hybrid courses... but having traffic is an unnecessary feature. I know it's fun trying to avoid cars on tracks whilst driving at high speed and in some degree it is extremely entertaining. The best game for this kind of thing is the original Need for Speed... some of those great windy twisty tracks they had which were point to point.. absolutely loved that. I would love a course through London to appear in GT4.. as I live there it would be nice to see all the landmarks... plus we have plenty of places where the roads linkup nicely to form somewhat of a track already.

Anyway... I don't think we'll see additional random AI cars driving around to obstruct us in future games... but I wouldn't mind seeing more street based courses.
 
VaT
totally uncalled for :( i think you are taking this a bit too seriously i would want a street racing game with the seriousness and quality of GT i mean hey IT'll ONLY BE A GAME.
i don’t support street racing i think its a really dumb thing to do but if they ain't got respect for they're own lives or others then they get what they deserve, i mean everyone can make up they're own mind if they want to race illegally then there is nothing you or me can do about it.
so all of you just take a chill pill there is no need for remarks "Physics" like that if you don't like the idea blank it forget its even there,there are admins/mods in this forum if they think he is creating a propaganda then they’ll lock it simple
just my opinion


Ok ... your pulling out of McDonalds parking lot you look to see if you can make the turn and a car come flying by at 75MPH in a 35MPH zone. You think "that crazy street racer he'll crash one day and he deserves it" you proceed to pull out of the parking lot and his friend who was a few seconds behind him plows into the side of your car at 87.5MPH.

Now maybe that illegal street racer deserved what he got but you probably didn't. I know you siad you didnt support it but you said it was alright cuase they will get what they deserve. The thing is they are gambling with innocent lives as well as there own.

On that note I think street racing like that is perfectly fine in games. Personally I liked Burnout 3. I just dont think it has any place in a game such as GT4.
 
PD doesn't make street racing titles. If they ever do, discuss a GT-like street racer then. Otherwise, go gripe at Genki and EA to improve their games' physics engines.

It's as simple as that.

Yes, I own and love every TXR game, and ever the imported "Shutoko Highway Battle" versions - before you tell me I'm just against street racing games in general. I even own the lesser-known "Felony 1179".
 
It really doesnt matter if its under the name GT or if PD makes the game, he is just asking for a Need For Speed Undergound type game except with a physics model as complicated as GT4.

That game I would buy instantly.
 
If that's the case, it has no place in the GT4 forum, now does it?

And actually, yes, he did indeed, ask that PD add the "feature" to a GT title.
As bad as this may sound I think I would want GT games to have driving in the city especially the traffic.
 
Racedriver33
Street-racers are egotists with no respect for other people. Totally mindless.


You sir are arrogant. I have street raced for the better part of 6 year career. My street racing consists of very organized races, late on weekday nights, when we can block off a nice long road, and be free to race with no traffic, and a decent 4 or 5 lane wide road.

I do not however carry my thirst for speed into my everyday driving, I am almost always law abiding when driving (except on teh freeway...who doesn't go 5 over?). I know my limits, and would never push myself or my car beyond them to inflate my ego.
 
Do you get permission to close off these roads? What if an ambulance needs to get through?

Stop trying to justify an illegal activity.
 
Ten
Do you get permission to close off these roads? What if an ambulance needs to get through?

Stop trying to justify an illegal activity.


Its not that Im justifying it, Im letting him know that his assumption of us all being egotistical assholes who swerve through traffic is horribly wrong.

On the part of the ambulance, I highly doubt an ambulance will need to get through a road tucked back in a large industrial complex....
 
Why are we still discussing this? Whether it's "organized" or not doesn't change the fact it's still illegal. And therefore, certainly doesn't fall under the "professional" category that GT covers.
 
Back