As well as Hamilton and Schumacher.Sebastian Vettel deserved his 4 titles.
As well as Hamilton and Schumacher.Sebastian Vettel deserved his 4 titles.
DirecTV broadcasts, which show onboards or even normal cams without commentary in the commercial breaks are great. Sport1 US does it like that too when broadcasting Indy. I get what you mean though, the whole US TV broadcasting style ruins the sport.I switched on to watch some of the XFinity race this morning (my time), was quite happy watching it until I got sick of the constant ads
Le Mans 2016 is probably the best races since I Was born probably.
Sans the TS040 DNF at the end but l.....
Well, that is sorta the point of having clear #1 and #2 drivers.The fact that Mercedes don't employ first and second driver tactics, and build the team and car around one driver, is the only reason Rosberg is ever close to, or faster than Hamilton.
He's good, but if Mercedes gave Hamilton the treatment Red Bull and Ferrari gave Vettel and Schumacher respectively, I don't think Rosberg could ever touch Lewis.
Well, that is sorta the point of having clear #1 and #2 drivers.
In the former case, it was more about crippling crashes than an unstable hierarchy - though I imagine things would've been heated if Villeneuve and Pironi were around for the entire year.And in some cases, such as Ferrari in 1982 and 1983, a lack of a clearly defined #1 and #2 cost them the title as they squabbled amongst themselves.
Mercedes-Benz are lucky that they are so dominant. If there was another team on their level with a clear Schumacher/Irvine-Barrichello definition, they mightn't win as often as they do.
Before they made the engine changes and Mercedes started winning everything.@R1600Turbo When, in your opinion, did it not suck?
Back when Red Bull was winning everything?Before they made the engine changes and Mercedes started winning everything.
Back when Red Bull was winning everything?
Back when Red Bull was winning everything?
Nah, probably before that when Ferrari was winning everything.
The fact that Mercedes don't employ first and second driver tactics, and build the team and car around one driver, is the only reason Rosberg is ever close to, or faster than Hamilton.
He's good, but if Mercedes gave Hamilton the treatment Red Bull and Ferrari gave Vettel and Schumacher respectively, I don't think Rosberg could ever touch Lewis.
Nah, probably before that when Ferrari was winning everything.
No it was when McLaren were winning everything.Ah. You mean when Williams was winning everything. 👍
No. It was when Prost was winning everything.No it was when McLaren were winning everything.
How about when Lotus was winning everything?
The World Championship has been boring since Ascari started winning everything tbhI stopped watching in 1954 when Fangio started winning everything.
Looks like it was a mistake to post in this thread.
Mercedes have won 43 of the last 50 races
Yeah I wasn't keeping count either, just knew it was bad based on headlines. Now that I see the numbers....ouch.I was obviously aware how much they have dominated but when you put it with those raw figures...
We're just having a laugh, there is no doubt it's been a long time since a team dominated as much as Mercedes. They've won 43 of the last 50 races and they had the pace to win at least 4 of those they didn't. I'd say there are only three races they've lost since 2014 where they were straight up outperformed on the day and that was Vettel's three wins last year. The three that Ricciardo took they could've won if not for reliability or "Nico hit me" and we all know how they lost Spain this year.