unrealistic powerbands and rpm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adamaw11
  • 68 comments
  • 7,770 views
Don't try playing it off like I'm the bad guy,

Oh I don't think you're bad. You're just rude. It's alright, we can work on it.

you know what you did.

You think you know what I did.

You're always starting arguments on GTP, I see you all the time,

That's a lie. What arguments am I always starting?

I know who you are.

That's hilarious. You have no idea.

I'm done here.

Hang on. I bet not.
 
Muscle cars seem to be the worst offenders. Your 426 Hemi doesn't make 150lb-ft of torque at 2,500rpm, it makes almost 500 and redlines at 5,500.
 
I would just like to point out on the first page, he says the supra and the aristo have different powerbands, WELL MAYBE IF YOU PUT THE SAME 🤬 TURBO ON THE CAR MAYBE IT WOULD BE SOMEWHAT SIMILAR (HINT: IT IS).
:banghead:
 
Atmospheric engines are typically in the 8,5 to 10,5 bar range while the highest MEP for a atmospheric engine being the BMW S54B32 @ 15,1 bar (117 NM/l).

What about S54B32HP ? It was even more tuned...?
 
YZF
What about S54B32HP ? It was even more tuned...?
Yes, it has 5 nm more torque than the regular one giving it a slightly higher pressure.
The Ferrari F136 F has a slightly higher specific torque than the BMW with around 120 nm/l.
 
Well i've seen little 1liter engines putting out over 300hp...
And that at around 7000rpm sooo i don't see there the problem.
 
Well i've seen little 1liter engines putting out over 300hp...
And that at around 7000rpm sooo i don't see there the problem.

What engine would that be?
It's not going to make that without forced induction.
 
What engine would that be?
It's not going to make that without forced induction.

I think it was a 3cyl Ford Ecoboost, and yes, turbocharged.
It's from the formula ford.
 
I think it was a 3cyl Ford Ecoboost, and yes, turbocharged.
It's from the formula ford.

That engine only made 200hp, the 300hp version was a 2L.
 
Back