unrealistic powerbands and rpm

  • Thread starter Adamaw11
  • 68 comments
  • 6,636 views
Don't try playing it off like I'm the bad guy,

Oh I don't think you're bad. You're just rude. It's alright, we can work on it.

you know what you did.

You think you know what I did.

You're always starting arguments on GTP, I see you all the time,

That's a lie. What arguments am I always starting?

I know who you are.

That's hilarious. You have no idea.

I'm done here.

Hang on. I bet not.
 
Muscle cars seem to be the worst offenders. Your 426 Hemi doesn't make 150lb-ft of torque at 2,500rpm, it makes almost 500 and redlines at 5,500.
 
I would just like to point out on the first page, he says the supra and the aristo have different powerbands, WELL MAYBE IF YOU PUT THE SAME 🤬 TURBO ON THE CAR MAYBE IT WOULD BE SOMEWHAT SIMILAR (HINT: IT IS).
:banghead:
 
Atmospheric engines are typically in the 8,5 to 10,5 bar range while the highest MEP for a atmospheric engine being the BMW S54B32 @ 15,1 bar (117 NM/l).

What about S54B32HP ? It was even more tuned...?
 
YZF
What about S54B32HP ? It was even more tuned...?
Yes, it has 5 nm more torque than the regular one giving it a slightly higher pressure.
The Ferrari F136 F has a slightly higher specific torque than the BMW with around 120 nm/l.
 
Well i've seen little 1liter engines putting out over 300hp...
And that at around 7000rpm sooo i don't see there the problem.
 
Well i've seen little 1liter engines putting out over 300hp...
And that at around 7000rpm sooo i don't see there the problem.

What engine would that be?
It's not going to make that without forced induction.
 
Back