- 1,795
What's this about a 550 destroyed, too?
It's my all-time favorite Ferrari, too
It's my all-time favorite Ferrari, too
What's this about a 550 destroyed, too?
It's my all-time favorite Ferrari, too![]()
They lost their lives due to an occupational hazard. We don't get all heartbroken when a steel worker loses his life or when a road worker gets hit by a car, why is it that we do when troops die? They knew what they were getting into when they signed up for the military.
If I sound anti-troop, I'm not, I'm just sick of people whining about it. They are employees just like everyone else. Yes it's bad when they die, yes they are dying in a messed up war, but like I said we don't even care about the people who die doing their jobs on a yearly bases...heck we don't even hear about them.
We are complaining about the cars because that is the subject of this thread, and the troops are part of it because they are wasting time, money, and weaponry on stupid things.
Over 655,000 Iraqis and more than three thousand Coalition servicemen and women have lost their lives since 2003 due to the war.
And you guys are acting like the world is ending because a couple of cars got blown up.
Nice thread.
M
Over 655,000 Iraqis and more than three thousand Coalition servicemen and women have lost their lives since 2003 due to the war.
And you guys are acting like the world is ending because a couple of cars got blown up.
Nice thread.
M
The problem is that you still fail to grasp that practicality is not subjective because it is a measurable trait. Therefore, it is essentially a fact more than it is an opinion.
In addition, whether you care whether it is more practical or not is irrelevant because it is STILL MORE PRACTICAL THAN THE COUNTACH BY PURE STATISTICAL FACT.
Whether you use the expanded practicality is also irrelevant because the LM002 is still more practical.
In addition, you have given no alternate (and undoubtedly incorrect) definition of the term for which to base your opinion that the LM002 is not infinitely more practical.
All you have talked about is how it would be a more satisfactory drive, or how it is worth more or looks better. Not one of your rebuttals to my point on its practicality has anything to do with practicality, leading me to believe that you don't actually know what it is. In addition, you have countered the fact that it is more practical with opinions that are completely irrelavent to the discussion.
Over 655,000 Iraqis and more than three thousand Coalition servicemen and women have lost their lives since 2003 due to the war.
And you guys are acting like the world is ending because a couple of cars got blown up.
Nice thread.
M
Just for the record. The UN states that about 35,000 Iraqis have died from 2003 to 2006, not 650,000. That number is totally ridiculous and has been reported incorrectly without correction.
I wish Saddam, Uday, and Qusay were inside the 550 when they blew it up.
They lost their lives due to an occupational hazard. We don't get all heartbroken when a steel worker loses his life or when a road worker gets hit by a car, why is it that we do when troops die? They knew what they were getting into when they signed up for the military.
If I sound anti-troop, I'm not, I'm just sick of people whining about it. They are employees just like everyone else. Yes it's bad when they die, yes they are dying in a messed up war, but like I said we don't even care about the people who die doing their jobs on a yearly bases...heck we don't even hear about them.
We are complaining about the cars because that is the subject of this thread, and the troops are part of it because they are wasting time, money, and weaponry on stupid things.
We are discussing just the cars, because, the subject is the cars. The loss of human life is very tragic, you can't really debate that. But relatively no one cares when rare and beautiful works of engineering are lost forever just because someone had some extra bombs lying around.
Just for the record. The UN states that about 35,000 Iraqis have died from 2003 to 2006, not 650,000. That number is totally ridiculous and has been reported incorrectly without correction.